Exam 59: Richard Taylor
Exam 1: Plato28 Questions
Exam 2: Aristotle28 Questions
Exam 3: Epicurus32 Questions
Exam 4: Cicero32 Questions
Exam 5: Epictetus30 Questions
Exam 6: Augustine32 Questions
Exam 7: Thomas Aquinas32 Questions
Exam 8: Thomas Hobbes27 Questions
Exam 9: Joseph Butler32 Questions
Exam 10: David Hume32 Questions
Exam 11: Immanuel Kant29 Questions
Exam 12: Jeremy Bentham32 Questions
Exam 13: John Stuart Mill27 Questions
Exam 14: Henry Sidgwick32 Questions
Exam 15: Friedrich Nietzsche32 Questions
Exam 16: G.E.Moore32 Questions
Exam 17: H.A.Prichard32 Questions
Exam 18: A.J.Ayer32 Questions
Exam 19: C.L.Stevenson32 Questions
Exam 20: John Dewey32 Questions
Exam 21: R.M.Hare32 Questions
Exam 22: J.J.C.Smart32 Questions
Exam 23: Bernard Williams32 Questions
Exam 24: W.D.Ross31 Questions
Exam 25: John Rawls27 Questions
Exam 26: David Gauthier32 Questions
Exam 27: T.M.Scanlon32 Questions
Exam 28: Barbara Herman32 Questions
Exam 29: Philippa Foot32 Questions
Exam 30: Christine Korsgaard32 Questions
Exam 31: Thomas Nagel32 Questions
Exam 32: Susan Wolf23 Questions
Exam 33: Jean-Paul Sartre31 Questions
Exam 34: G.E.M.Anscombe32 Questions
Exam 35: Julia Annas32 Questions
Exam 36: Nomy Arpaly32 Questions
Exam 37: Virginia Held32 Questions
Exam 38: Gilbert Harman32 Questions
Exam 39: J.L.Mackie32 Questions
Exam 40: Walter Sinnott-Armstrong32 Questions
Exam 41: Mary Midgley30 Questions
Exam 42: James Rachels25 Questions
Exam 43: Judith Jarvis Thomson26 Questions
Exam 44: Don Marquis32 Questions
Exam 45: James Rachels29 Questions
Exam 46: Philippa Foot32 Questions
Exam 47: Peter Singer27 Questions
Exam 48: Travis Timmerman25 Questions
Exam 49: Tom Regan32 Questions
Exam 50: Henry Shue32 Questions
Exam 51: Karen Hanson32 Questions
Exam 52: Laurence Thomas32 Questions
Exam 53: Celia Wolf-Devine32 Questions
Exam 54: N.Ann Davis16 Questions
Exam 55: Margaret Crouch16 Questions
Exam 56: Judith Jarvis Thomson32 Questions
Exam 57: Judith Jarvis Thomson32 Questions
Exam 58: Thomas Nagel32 Questions
Exam 59: Richard Taylor24 Questions
Select questions type
Richard Taylor: The Meaning of Life
To understand the question of whether life has any meaning, Taylor begins by considering a clear case of a meaningless life: the mythical character of Sisyphus. Sisyphus is condemned by the gods to roll a stone to the top of a hill every day, only to have it roll back down each night. Taylor claims that Sisyphus's life is meaningless not because it involves monotonous work, but because it does not achieve any significant culmination; all his labors simply come to nothing. Nonetheless, Sisyphus's life could be given a certain kind of meaning if he happened to be instilled with a strong desire to do nothing but roll stones, so that each day he was doing exactly what he most wanted to be doing.
Taylor argues that human lives are analogous to the plight of Sisyphus in that they, too, lack any significant culmination. Like nonhuman animals, humans pass through certain phases, reproduce, and ultimately die, only for the cycle to begin all over again. Civilizations rise and fall, and ultimately nothing enduring comes of it. Nonetheless, Taylor argues that human lives can be given the exact same kind of meaning that Sisyphus's could have. Most human beings have an inner compulsion to go about their lives and pursue their projects, despite the objective meaninglessness of doing so. This type of meaning, is actual superior to the type of meaning that involves a significant culmination, for any such objective meaning would lead only to boredom. Taylor concludes that the point of life is simply living, driven to pursue our ends by desires that lack any ultimate justification.
-According to Taylor, if the gods had implanted in Sisyphus an impulse to roll stones, Sisyphus's life:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(72)
Richard Taylor: The Meaning of Life
To understand the question of whether life has any meaning, Taylor begins by considering a clear case of a meaningless life: the mythical character of Sisyphus. Sisyphus is condemned by the gods to roll a stone to the top of a hill every day, only to have it roll back down each night. Taylor claims that Sisyphus's life is meaningless not because it involves monotonous work, but because it does not achieve any significant culmination; all his labors simply come to nothing. Nonetheless, Sisyphus's life could be given a certain kind of meaning if he happened to be instilled with a strong desire to do nothing but roll stones, so that each day he was doing exactly what he most wanted to be doing.
Taylor argues that human lives are analogous to the plight of Sisyphus in that they, too, lack any significant culmination. Like nonhuman animals, humans pass through certain phases, reproduce, and ultimately die, only for the cycle to begin all over again. Civilizations rise and fall, and ultimately nothing enduring comes of it. Nonetheless, Taylor argues that human lives can be given the exact same kind of meaning that Sisyphus's could have. Most human beings have an inner compulsion to go about their lives and pursue their projects, despite the objective meaninglessness of doing so. This type of meaning, is actual superior to the type of meaning that involves a significant culmination, for any such objective meaning would lead only to boredom. Taylor concludes that the point of life is simply living, driven to pursue our ends by desires that lack any ultimate justification.
-According to Taylor, the point of a living thing's life is to serve others.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(78)
Richard Taylor: The Meaning of Life
To understand the question of whether life has any meaning, Taylor begins by considering a clear case of a meaningless life: the mythical character of Sisyphus. Sisyphus is condemned by the gods to roll a stone to the top of a hill every day, only to have it roll back down each night. Taylor claims that Sisyphus's life is meaningless not because it involves monotonous work, but because it does not achieve any significant culmination; all his labors simply come to nothing. Nonetheless, Sisyphus's life could be given a certain kind of meaning if he happened to be instilled with a strong desire to do nothing but roll stones, so that each day he was doing exactly what he most wanted to be doing.
Taylor argues that human lives are analogous to the plight of Sisyphus in that they, too, lack any significant culmination. Like nonhuman animals, humans pass through certain phases, reproduce, and ultimately die, only for the cycle to begin all over again. Civilizations rise and fall, and ultimately nothing enduring comes of it. Nonetheless, Taylor argues that human lives can be given the exact same kind of meaning that Sisyphus's could have. Most human beings have an inner compulsion to go about their lives and pursue their projects, despite the objective meaninglessness of doing so. This type of meaning, is actual superior to the type of meaning that involves a significant culmination, for any such objective meaning would lead only to boredom. Taylor concludes that the point of life is simply living, driven to pursue our ends by desires that lack any ultimate justification.
-Describe the myth of Sisyphus. What does Sisyphus's plight represent for Taylor? What does he think we can learn from reflecting on this story? Do you agree with him?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(73)
Richard Taylor: The Meaning of Life
To understand the question of whether life has any meaning, Taylor begins by considering a clear case of a meaningless life: the mythical character of Sisyphus. Sisyphus is condemned by the gods to roll a stone to the top of a hill every day, only to have it roll back down each night. Taylor claims that Sisyphus's life is meaningless not because it involves monotonous work, but because it does not achieve any significant culmination; all his labors simply come to nothing. Nonetheless, Sisyphus's life could be given a certain kind of meaning if he happened to be instilled with a strong desire to do nothing but roll stones, so that each day he was doing exactly what he most wanted to be doing.
Taylor argues that human lives are analogous to the plight of Sisyphus in that they, too, lack any significant culmination. Like nonhuman animals, humans pass through certain phases, reproduce, and ultimately die, only for the cycle to begin all over again. Civilizations rise and fall, and ultimately nothing enduring comes of it. Nonetheless, Taylor argues that human lives can be given the exact same kind of meaning that Sisyphus's could have. Most human beings have an inner compulsion to go about their lives and pursue their projects, despite the objective meaninglessness of doing so. This type of meaning, is actual superior to the type of meaning that involves a significant culmination, for any such objective meaning would lead only to boredom. Taylor concludes that the point of life is simply living, driven to pursue our ends by desires that lack any ultimate justification.
-Taylor claims that our lives can acquire meaning if we have an inner compulsion to be doing something.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(78)
Showing 21 - 24 of 24
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)