Exam 12: Jeremy Bentham

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -The principle of utility states that:

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -What is the principle of utility, and how does Bentham think it can be established? Does the principle of utility provide a reliable guide to our moral obligations? Defend your answer.

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -Bentham claims that pleasures and pains can be greater or less according to their:

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -According to Bentham, it is impossible to prove the principle of utility directly.

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -Bentham defines the fecundity of a pleasure or pain as:

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -According to Bentham, a thing promotes a person's interest when it:

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -In Bentham's terminology, asceticism is the view that:

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -Under what "two sovereign masters" has mankind been placed, according to Bentham? What exactly does he mean by this? Does this provide a plausible account of human action? Why or why not?

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -The principle of utility approves of actions according to their tendency to promote happiness.

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -Bentham claims that utilitarian calculations:

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -What are the "four sanctions" that Bentham discusses? Give an example of each sanction. Do Bentham's categories provide a useful way of thinking about harm and benefit?

Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham endorses both a descriptive and a normative version of hedonism, the view that the human good is pleasure and absence of pain. According to the descriptive version, all human actions are performed for the sake of obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain. According to the normative version, what we ought to do is determined solely by considerations of pleasure and pain. As a development of this normative thesis, Bentham goes on to endorse the principle of utility, the claim that an action is right when it tends to add to the sum total of the pleasures of those affected, where this "sum" is conceived of as the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain. Bentham claims that the words right and wrong can have no other meaning than that laid out by the principle of utility, and that alternative moral theories usually end up invoking utilitarian considerations. Nonetheless, Bentham admits that the principle of utility cannot be directly proved, because it is the foundational principle from which ethical arguments begin. Bentham critiques the rival "principle of sympathy and antipathy" according to which an action is right if and only if one approves of it. This principle, Bentham objects, is really no principle at all, for a principle is supposed to tell us when our attitudes are justified, but the principle of sympathy and antipathy merely assumes in advance that our attitudes have such justification. Taking the principle of utility as established, Bentham concludes with a discussion of how we are to apply it. He distinguishes four sources of pleasure and pain: physical, political, moral, and religious. He then discusses the various ways in which pleasures and pains can be quantitatively different. Determining our moral obligations requires weighing various pleasures and pains against each other, and seeking the greatest balance between them. Bentham notes that we needn't perform such calculations every time we act, but insists that we should always keep them in the back of our mind. -According to Bentham, the principle of utility should be applied to individual actions, but not to government policies.