Exam 1: Plato
Exam 1: Plato28 Questions
Exam 2: Aristotle28 Questions
Exam 3: Epicurus32 Questions
Exam 4: Cicero32 Questions
Exam 5: Epictetus30 Questions
Exam 6: Augustine32 Questions
Exam 7: Thomas Aquinas32 Questions
Exam 8: Thomas Hobbes27 Questions
Exam 9: Joseph Butler32 Questions
Exam 10: David Hume32 Questions
Exam 11: Immanuel Kant29 Questions
Exam 12: Jeremy Bentham32 Questions
Exam 13: John Stuart Mill27 Questions
Exam 14: Henry Sidgwick32 Questions
Exam 15: Friedrich Nietzsche32 Questions
Exam 16: G.E.Moore32 Questions
Exam 17: H.A.Prichard32 Questions
Exam 18: A.J.Ayer32 Questions
Exam 19: C.L.Stevenson32 Questions
Exam 20: John Dewey32 Questions
Exam 21: R.M.Hare32 Questions
Exam 22: J.J.C.Smart32 Questions
Exam 23: Bernard Williams32 Questions
Exam 24: W.D.Ross31 Questions
Exam 25: John Rawls27 Questions
Exam 26: David Gauthier32 Questions
Exam 27: T.M.Scanlon32 Questions
Exam 28: Barbara Herman32 Questions
Exam 29: Philippa Foot32 Questions
Exam 30: Christine Korsgaard32 Questions
Exam 31: Thomas Nagel32 Questions
Exam 32: Susan Wolf23 Questions
Exam 33: Jean-Paul Sartre31 Questions
Exam 34: G.E.M.Anscombe32 Questions
Exam 35: Julia Annas32 Questions
Exam 36: Nomy Arpaly32 Questions
Exam 37: Virginia Held32 Questions
Exam 38: Gilbert Harman32 Questions
Exam 39: J.L.Mackie32 Questions
Exam 40: Walter Sinnott-Armstrong32 Questions
Exam 41: Mary Midgley30 Questions
Exam 42: James Rachels25 Questions
Exam 43: Judith Jarvis Thomson26 Questions
Exam 44: Don Marquis32 Questions
Exam 45: James Rachels29 Questions
Exam 46: Philippa Foot32 Questions
Exam 47: Peter Singer27 Questions
Exam 48: Travis Timmerman25 Questions
Exam 49: Tom Regan32 Questions
Exam 50: Henry Shue32 Questions
Exam 51: Karen Hanson32 Questions
Exam 52: Laurence Thomas32 Questions
Exam 53: Celia Wolf-Devine32 Questions
Exam 54: N.Ann Davis16 Questions
Exam 55: Margaret Crouch16 Questions
Exam 56: Judith Jarvis Thomson32 Questions
Exam 57: Judith Jarvis Thomson32 Questions
Exam 58: Thomas Nagel32 Questions
Exam 59: Richard Taylor24 Questions
Select questions type
Plato: Selections
These dialogues present several of the main ideas of Socrates's moral philosophy, including the views that one's primary concern should be cultivating justice within oneself, and that true wisdom consists of being aware of one's ignorance. By writing in dialogue, Plato also introduces Socrates's method of doing philosophy via the give and take of rational discussion.
In the Euthyphro, Socrates interrogates a young Athenian about the nature of holiness. When Euthyphro claims to know what the holy is, Socrates pressures him to provide a definition. After several initial attempts to do so are unsuccessful, Euthyphro proposes that the holy is what all the gods love, and the unholy is what all the gods hate. Socrates responds with a now-famous question: "Is the holy loved by the gods because it is holy? Or is it holy because it is loved?" When Euthyphro replies that the gods love things because they are holy, Socrates points out that this definition implies that things are holy prior to the gods' love for them. Thus Socrates complains that Euthyphro has not explained what it is to be holy. The dialogue closes without arriving at any satisfactory definition of the holy.
In the Defence of Socrates, Socrates is on trial for corrupting the young and failing to acknowledge the gods of Athens. Over the course of his defense, Socrates tells the story of how he came to be a philosopher, and claims that his superior wisdom consists in knowing that he is ignorant of things that other people falsely claim to know. Socrates also claims that death is not to be feared, for we do not know whether death is truly a harm or not. Despite his defense, Socrates is convicted and sentenced to death.
In the Crito, Socrates is in prison awaiting his sentence when he is approached by a friend, who argues that he should try to escape punishment. Socrates argues that by choosing to live in Athens, he has agreed to follow the laws of the city, and therefore it would be unjust for him to escape from prison. Because Socrates values justice more than he values his own life, he chooses to remain in prison. His sentence is carried out in the excerpt of the Phaedo printed here.
The Republic is Plato's masterpiece, and is a long reflection on the nature of justice, both at the level of the city-state and within an individual. Just as in the Euthyphro Socrates sought an account of the nature of holiness, here he seeks to know what it is for a person or a state to be just, and whether a just life is preferable to an unjust one. For this purpose, Socrates presents a detailed description of what he regards as the ideal city, ruled by philosopher kings. Just as the just city is ruled by philosophers, Socrates claims that a just soul is ruled by its rational part. One of the primary conclusions of the dialogue is that the life of a just person is also happiest.
-What definition of holiness does Euthyphro endorse, and what question does Socrates pose in response to this definition? What difficulties does Socrates's question raise for Euthyphro's theory? Is Socrates's question relevant to contemporary debates about religion and morality? Why or why not?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(76)
Plato: Selections
These dialogues present several of the main ideas of Socrates's moral philosophy, including the views that one's primary concern should be cultivating justice within oneself, and that true wisdom consists of being aware of one's ignorance. By writing in dialogue, Plato also introduces Socrates's method of doing philosophy via the give and take of rational discussion.
In the Euthyphro, Socrates interrogates a young Athenian about the nature of holiness. When Euthyphro claims to know what the holy is, Socrates pressures him to provide a definition. After several initial attempts to do so are unsuccessful, Euthyphro proposes that the holy is what all the gods love, and the unholy is what all the gods hate. Socrates responds with a now-famous question: "Is the holy loved by the gods because it is holy? Or is it holy because it is loved?" When Euthyphro replies that the gods love things because they are holy, Socrates points out that this definition implies that things are holy prior to the gods' love for them. Thus Socrates complains that Euthyphro has not explained what it is to be holy. The dialogue closes without arriving at any satisfactory definition of the holy.
In the Defence of Socrates, Socrates is on trial for corrupting the young and failing to acknowledge the gods of Athens. Over the course of his defense, Socrates tells the story of how he came to be a philosopher, and claims that his superior wisdom consists in knowing that he is ignorant of things that other people falsely claim to know. Socrates also claims that death is not to be feared, for we do not know whether death is truly a harm or not. Despite his defense, Socrates is convicted and sentenced to death.
In the Crito, Socrates is in prison awaiting his sentence when he is approached by a friend, who argues that he should try to escape punishment. Socrates argues that by choosing to live in Athens, he has agreed to follow the laws of the city, and therefore it would be unjust for him to escape from prison. Because Socrates values justice more than he values his own life, he chooses to remain in prison. His sentence is carried out in the excerpt of the Phaedo printed here.
The Republic is Plato's masterpiece, and is a long reflection on the nature of justice, both at the level of the city-state and within an individual. Just as in the Euthyphro Socrates sought an account of the nature of holiness, here he seeks to know what it is for a person or a state to be just, and whether a just life is preferable to an unjust one. For this purpose, Socrates presents a detailed description of what he regards as the ideal city, ruled by philosopher kings. Just as the just city is ruled by philosophers, Socrates claims that a just soul is ruled by its rational part. One of the primary conclusions of the dialogue is that the life of a just person is also happiest.
-Socrates claims things are holy because the gods love them.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(81)
Plato: Selections
These dialogues present several of the main ideas of Socrates's moral philosophy, including the views that one's primary concern should be cultivating justice within oneself, and that true wisdom consists of being aware of one's ignorance. By writing in dialogue, Plato also introduces Socrates's method of doing philosophy via the give and take of rational discussion.
In the Euthyphro, Socrates interrogates a young Athenian about the nature of holiness. When Euthyphro claims to know what the holy is, Socrates pressures him to provide a definition. After several initial attempts to do so are unsuccessful, Euthyphro proposes that the holy is what all the gods love, and the unholy is what all the gods hate. Socrates responds with a now-famous question: "Is the holy loved by the gods because it is holy? Or is it holy because it is loved?" When Euthyphro replies that the gods love things because they are holy, Socrates points out that this definition implies that things are holy prior to the gods' love for them. Thus Socrates complains that Euthyphro has not explained what it is to be holy. The dialogue closes without arriving at any satisfactory definition of the holy.
In the Defence of Socrates, Socrates is on trial for corrupting the young and failing to acknowledge the gods of Athens. Over the course of his defense, Socrates tells the story of how he came to be a philosopher, and claims that his superior wisdom consists in knowing that he is ignorant of things that other people falsely claim to know. Socrates also claims that death is not to be feared, for we do not know whether death is truly a harm or not. Despite his defense, Socrates is convicted and sentenced to death.
In the Crito, Socrates is in prison awaiting his sentence when he is approached by a friend, who argues that he should try to escape punishment. Socrates argues that by choosing to live in Athens, he has agreed to follow the laws of the city, and therefore it would be unjust for him to escape from prison. Because Socrates values justice more than he values his own life, he chooses to remain in prison. His sentence is carried out in the excerpt of the Phaedo printed here.
The Republic is Plato's masterpiece, and is a long reflection on the nature of justice, both at the level of the city-state and within an individual. Just as in the Euthyphro Socrates sought an account of the nature of holiness, here he seeks to know what it is for a person or a state to be just, and whether a just life is preferable to an unjust one. For this purpose, Socrates presents a detailed description of what he regards as the ideal city, ruled by philosopher kings. Just as the just city is ruled by philosophers, Socrates claims that a just soul is ruled by its rational part. One of the primary conclusions of the dialogue is that the life of a just person is also happiest.
-In the Defence of Socrates, one of the accusers claims that Socrates does not believe in the gods.
(True/False)
5.0/5
(82)
Plato: Selections
These dialogues present several of the main ideas of Socrates's moral philosophy, including the views that one's primary concern should be cultivating justice within oneself, and that true wisdom consists of being aware of one's ignorance. By writing in dialogue, Plato also introduces Socrates's method of doing philosophy via the give and take of rational discussion.
In the Euthyphro, Socrates interrogates a young Athenian about the nature of holiness. When Euthyphro claims to know what the holy is, Socrates pressures him to provide a definition. After several initial attempts to do so are unsuccessful, Euthyphro proposes that the holy is what all the gods love, and the unholy is what all the gods hate. Socrates responds with a now-famous question: "Is the holy loved by the gods because it is holy? Or is it holy because it is loved?" When Euthyphro replies that the gods love things because they are holy, Socrates points out that this definition implies that things are holy prior to the gods' love for them. Thus Socrates complains that Euthyphro has not explained what it is to be holy. The dialogue closes without arriving at any satisfactory definition of the holy.
In the Defence of Socrates, Socrates is on trial for corrupting the young and failing to acknowledge the gods of Athens. Over the course of his defense, Socrates tells the story of how he came to be a philosopher, and claims that his superior wisdom consists in knowing that he is ignorant of things that other people falsely claim to know. Socrates also claims that death is not to be feared, for we do not know whether death is truly a harm or not. Despite his defense, Socrates is convicted and sentenced to death.
In the Crito, Socrates is in prison awaiting his sentence when he is approached by a friend, who argues that he should try to escape punishment. Socrates argues that by choosing to live in Athens, he has agreed to follow the laws of the city, and therefore it would be unjust for him to escape from prison. Because Socrates values justice more than he values his own life, he chooses to remain in prison. His sentence is carried out in the excerpt of the Phaedo printed here.
The Republic is Plato's masterpiece, and is a long reflection on the nature of justice, both at the level of the city-state and within an individual. Just as in the Euthyphro Socrates sought an account of the nature of holiness, here he seeks to know what it is for a person or a state to be just, and whether a just life is preferable to an unjust one. For this purpose, Socrates presents a detailed description of what he regards as the ideal city, ruled by philosopher kings. Just as the just city is ruled by philosophers, Socrates claims that a just soul is ruled by its rational part. One of the primary conclusions of the dialogue is that the life of a just person is also happiest.
-According to Socrates, justice is when a soul is ruled by its:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(86)
Plato: Selections
These dialogues present several of the main ideas of Socrates's moral philosophy, including the views that one's primary concern should be cultivating justice within oneself, and that true wisdom consists of being aware of one's ignorance. By writing in dialogue, Plato also introduces Socrates's method of doing philosophy via the give and take of rational discussion.
In the Euthyphro, Socrates interrogates a young Athenian about the nature of holiness. When Euthyphro claims to know what the holy is, Socrates pressures him to provide a definition. After several initial attempts to do so are unsuccessful, Euthyphro proposes that the holy is what all the gods love, and the unholy is what all the gods hate. Socrates responds with a now-famous question: "Is the holy loved by the gods because it is holy? Or is it holy because it is loved?" When Euthyphro replies that the gods love things because they are holy, Socrates points out that this definition implies that things are holy prior to the gods' love for them. Thus Socrates complains that Euthyphro has not explained what it is to be holy. The dialogue closes without arriving at any satisfactory definition of the holy.
In the Defence of Socrates, Socrates is on trial for corrupting the young and failing to acknowledge the gods of Athens. Over the course of his defense, Socrates tells the story of how he came to be a philosopher, and claims that his superior wisdom consists in knowing that he is ignorant of things that other people falsely claim to know. Socrates also claims that death is not to be feared, for we do not know whether death is truly a harm or not. Despite his defense, Socrates is convicted and sentenced to death.
In the Crito, Socrates is in prison awaiting his sentence when he is approached by a friend, who argues that he should try to escape punishment. Socrates argues that by choosing to live in Athens, he has agreed to follow the laws of the city, and therefore it would be unjust for him to escape from prison. Because Socrates values justice more than he values his own life, he chooses to remain in prison. His sentence is carried out in the excerpt of the Phaedo printed here.
The Republic is Plato's masterpiece, and is a long reflection on the nature of justice, both at the level of the city-state and within an individual. Just as in the Euthyphro Socrates sought an account of the nature of holiness, here he seeks to know what it is for a person or a state to be just, and whether a just life is preferable to an unjust one. For this purpose, Socrates presents a detailed description of what he regards as the ideal city, ruled by philosopher kings. Just as the just city is ruled by philosophers, Socrates claims that a just soul is ruled by its rational part. One of the primary conclusions of the dialogue is that the life of a just person is also happiest.
-In the Defence of Socrates, Socrates claims that he does not care about avoiding death but does care to avoid:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(67)
Plato: Selections
These dialogues present several of the main ideas of Socrates's moral philosophy, including the views that one's primary concern should be cultivating justice within oneself, and that true wisdom consists of being aware of one's ignorance. By writing in dialogue, Plato also introduces Socrates's method of doing philosophy via the give and take of rational discussion.
In the Euthyphro, Socrates interrogates a young Athenian about the nature of holiness. When Euthyphro claims to know what the holy is, Socrates pressures him to provide a definition. After several initial attempts to do so are unsuccessful, Euthyphro proposes that the holy is what all the gods love, and the unholy is what all the gods hate. Socrates responds with a now-famous question: "Is the holy loved by the gods because it is holy? Or is it holy because it is loved?" When Euthyphro replies that the gods love things because they are holy, Socrates points out that this definition implies that things are holy prior to the gods' love for them. Thus Socrates complains that Euthyphro has not explained what it is to be holy. The dialogue closes without arriving at any satisfactory definition of the holy.
In the Defence of Socrates, Socrates is on trial for corrupting the young and failing to acknowledge the gods of Athens. Over the course of his defense, Socrates tells the story of how he came to be a philosopher, and claims that his superior wisdom consists in knowing that he is ignorant of things that other people falsely claim to know. Socrates also claims that death is not to be feared, for we do not know whether death is truly a harm or not. Despite his defense, Socrates is convicted and sentenced to death.
In the Crito, Socrates is in prison awaiting his sentence when he is approached by a friend, who argues that he should try to escape punishment. Socrates argues that by choosing to live in Athens, he has agreed to follow the laws of the city, and therefore it would be unjust for him to escape from prison. Because Socrates values justice more than he values his own life, he chooses to remain in prison. His sentence is carried out in the excerpt of the Phaedo printed here.
The Republic is Plato's masterpiece, and is a long reflection on the nature of justice, both at the level of the city-state and within an individual. Just as in the Euthyphro Socrates sought an account of the nature of holiness, here he seeks to know what it is for a person or a state to be just, and whether a just life is preferable to an unjust one. For this purpose, Socrates presents a detailed description of what he regards as the ideal city, ruled by philosopher kings. Just as the just city is ruled by philosophers, Socrates claims that a just soul is ruled by its rational part. One of the primary conclusions of the dialogue is that the life of a just person is also happiest.
-Socrates claims that justice is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(70)
Plato: Selections
These dialogues present several of the main ideas of Socrates's moral philosophy, including the views that one's primary concern should be cultivating justice within oneself, and that true wisdom consists of being aware of one's ignorance. By writing in dialogue, Plato also introduces Socrates's method of doing philosophy via the give and take of rational discussion.
In the Euthyphro, Socrates interrogates a young Athenian about the nature of holiness. When Euthyphro claims to know what the holy is, Socrates pressures him to provide a definition. After several initial attempts to do so are unsuccessful, Euthyphro proposes that the holy is what all the gods love, and the unholy is what all the gods hate. Socrates responds with a now-famous question: "Is the holy loved by the gods because it is holy? Or is it holy because it is loved?" When Euthyphro replies that the gods love things because they are holy, Socrates points out that this definition implies that things are holy prior to the gods' love for them. Thus Socrates complains that Euthyphro has not explained what it is to be holy. The dialogue closes without arriving at any satisfactory definition of the holy.
In the Defence of Socrates, Socrates is on trial for corrupting the young and failing to acknowledge the gods of Athens. Over the course of his defense, Socrates tells the story of how he came to be a philosopher, and claims that his superior wisdom consists in knowing that he is ignorant of things that other people falsely claim to know. Socrates also claims that death is not to be feared, for we do not know whether death is truly a harm or not. Despite his defense, Socrates is convicted and sentenced to death.
In the Crito, Socrates is in prison awaiting his sentence when he is approached by a friend, who argues that he should try to escape punishment. Socrates argues that by choosing to live in Athens, he has agreed to follow the laws of the city, and therefore it would be unjust for him to escape from prison. Because Socrates values justice more than he values his own life, he chooses to remain in prison. His sentence is carried out in the excerpt of the Phaedo printed here.
The Republic is Plato's masterpiece, and is a long reflection on the nature of justice, both at the level of the city-state and within an individual. Just as in the Euthyphro Socrates sought an account of the nature of holiness, here he seeks to know what it is for a person or a state to be just, and whether a just life is preferable to an unjust one. For this purpose, Socrates presents a detailed description of what he regards as the ideal city, ruled by philosopher kings. Just as the just city is ruled by philosophers, Socrates claims that a just soul is ruled by its rational part. One of the primary conclusions of the dialogue is that the life of a just person is also happiest.
-In the Crito, what arguments does Crito make to persuade Socrates to try to escape from prison? How does Socrates respond to these arguments? Who do you think has the stronger case, and why?
(Essay)
4.7/5
(72)
Plato: Selections
These dialogues present several of the main ideas of Socrates's moral philosophy, including the views that one's primary concern should be cultivating justice within oneself, and that true wisdom consists of being aware of one's ignorance. By writing in dialogue, Plato also introduces Socrates's method of doing philosophy via the give and take of rational discussion.
In the Euthyphro, Socrates interrogates a young Athenian about the nature of holiness. When Euthyphro claims to know what the holy is, Socrates pressures him to provide a definition. After several initial attempts to do so are unsuccessful, Euthyphro proposes that the holy is what all the gods love, and the unholy is what all the gods hate. Socrates responds with a now-famous question: "Is the holy loved by the gods because it is holy? Or is it holy because it is loved?" When Euthyphro replies that the gods love things because they are holy, Socrates points out that this definition implies that things are holy prior to the gods' love for them. Thus Socrates complains that Euthyphro has not explained what it is to be holy. The dialogue closes without arriving at any satisfactory definition of the holy.
In the Defence of Socrates, Socrates is on trial for corrupting the young and failing to acknowledge the gods of Athens. Over the course of his defense, Socrates tells the story of how he came to be a philosopher, and claims that his superior wisdom consists in knowing that he is ignorant of things that other people falsely claim to know. Socrates also claims that death is not to be feared, for we do not know whether death is truly a harm or not. Despite his defense, Socrates is convicted and sentenced to death.
In the Crito, Socrates is in prison awaiting his sentence when he is approached by a friend, who argues that he should try to escape punishment. Socrates argues that by choosing to live in Athens, he has agreed to follow the laws of the city, and therefore it would be unjust for him to escape from prison. Because Socrates values justice more than he values his own life, he chooses to remain in prison. His sentence is carried out in the excerpt of the Phaedo printed here.
The Republic is Plato's masterpiece, and is a long reflection on the nature of justice, both at the level of the city-state and within an individual. Just as in the Euthyphro Socrates sought an account of the nature of holiness, here he seeks to know what it is for a person or a state to be just, and whether a just life is preferable to an unjust one. For this purpose, Socrates presents a detailed description of what he regards as the ideal city, ruled by philosopher kings. Just as the just city is ruled by philosophers, Socrates claims that a just soul is ruled by its rational part. One of the primary conclusions of the dialogue is that the life of a just person is also happiest.
-In the Defence of Socrates, Socrates claims that we should not consider the risks of living or dying in deciding what to do.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(79)
Showing 21 - 28 of 28
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)