Exam 16: Multistate Corporate Taxation

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

In determining taxable income for state income tax purposes, interest income from Federal bonds typically constitutes an)_________ modification.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(65)

Typically exempt from the sales/use tax base is the purchase of clothing from a neighbor's garage sale.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(75)

In determining a corporation's taxable income for state income tax purposes, which of the following does not constitute a subtraction modification from Federal income?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(89)

_________describes) the degree of business activity that must be present before a taxing jurisdiction has the right to impose a tax on an out-of-state entity's income.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(87)

Most states begin the computation of corporate taxable income with an amount from the Federal income tax return.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(82)

The benefits of a passive investment company employed in a nonunitary state typically include:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(90)

The most commonly used state income tax apportionment formula is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(76)

Simpkin Corporation owns manufacturing facilities in States A, B, and C. State A uses a three-factor apportionment formula under which the sales, property, and payroll factors are equally weighted. State B uses a three-factor apportionment formula under which sales are double-weighted. State C employs a single-factor apportionment factor, based solely on sales. Simpkin's operations generated $1,000,000 of apportionable income, and its sales and payroll activity and average property owned in each of the three states is as follows: State A State B State C Totals Sales \ 400,000 \ 800,000 \ 300,000 \ 1,500,000 Payroll 100,000 150,000 50,000 300,000 Property 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000 Simpkin's apportionable income assigned to State B is:

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(82)

By making a water's edge election, a multinational taxpayer can limit the reach of unitary principles to the apportionment factors and income of its U.S. and E.U. affiliates.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(74)

Bert Corporation, a calendar year taxpayer, owns property in States M and O. Both states require that the average value of assets be included in the property factor. State M requires that the property be valued at its historical cost, and State O requires that the property be included in the property factor at its net depreciated book value. Bert Corporation, a calendar year taxpayer, owns property in States M and O. Both states require that the average value of assets be included in the property factor. State M requires that the property be valued at its historical cost, and State O requires that the property be included in the property factor at its net depreciated book value.    Bert Corporation, a calendar year taxpayer, owns property in States M and O. Both states require that the average value of assets be included in the property factor. State M requires that the property be valued at its historical cost, and State O requires that the property be included in the property factor at its net depreciated book value.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(91)

Usually a business chooses a location where it will build a new plant based chiefly on tax considerations.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(97)

Adams Corporation owns and operates two manufacturing facilities, one in State X and the other in State Y. Due to a temporary decline in the corporation's sales, Adams has rented 20% of its Y facility to an unaffiliated corporation. Adams generated $1,000,000 net rental income and $5,000,000 income from manufacturing. Adams is incorporated in Y. For X and Y purposes, rental income is classified as allocable nonbusiness income. By applying the statutes of each state, Adams determined that its apportionment factors are 0.65 for X and 0.35 for Y. Adams's income attributed to X is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(66)

A taxpayer automatically has nexus with a state for sales and use tax purposes if it has income tax nexus with the same state.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(83)

Double weighting the sales factor effectively decreases the corporate income tax burden on taxpayers based in a state such as entities with in-state headquarters.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(72)

Hendricks Corporation sells widgets in two states. State A levies a 9% effective tax rate, and State B levies a 3% rate. A and B have adopted sales-factor-only apportionment formulas. To reduce overall multistate income tax liabilities, Hendricks should:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(84)

If a gift card is unused after a specified period of time, the state can collect the amount of the card proceeds from the seller as ____________________ property.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(84)

Helene Corporation owns manufacturing facilities in States A, B, and C. State A uses a three-factor apportionment formula under which the sales, property, and payroll factors are equally weighted. State B uses a three-factor apportionment formula under which sales are double-weighted. State C employs a single-factor apportionment factor based solely on sales. Helene's operations generated $1,000,000 of apportionable income, and its sales and payroll activity and average property owned in each of the three states is as follows: State A State B State C Totals Sales \ 400,000 \ 800,000 \ 300,000 \ 1,500,000 Payroll 100,000 150,000 50,000 300,000 Property 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000 Helene's apportionable income assigned to State A is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(79)

Match each of the following terms with the appropriate description in the state income tax formula. Apply the UDITPA rules in your responses. -State-level NOL.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(75)

General Corporation is taxable in a number of states. This year, General made a $100,000 sale from its State A headquarters to a customer in State B. General has not established nexus with State B. State A does not apply a throwback rule. In which states) will the sale be included in the sales factor numerator?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(89)

General Corporation is taxable in a number of states. This year, General made a $100,000 sale from its State A headquarters to a customer in State B. This activity is not sufficient for General to create nexus with State B. State A applies a throwback rule but State B does not. In which states) will the sale be included in the sales factor numerator?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(86)
Showing 161 - 180 of 184
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)