Exam 8: Police and Constitutional Law

Police officers must establish ____________________ to obtain a warrant.

The exclusionary rule does not necessarily require that cases against defendants be dismissed when constitutional rights have been violated.

The exclusionary rule increases the legal protection for criminal defendants.

Police cannot rely on smell as a sense in conducting a warrantless search.

In Nix v.Williams (1984),the U.S.Supreme Court established the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule.

Unexplained bulges in clothing or awkwardness in walking are examples of behavioral analysis.

In a pat-down by an officer,items that are identifiable by touch cannot be seized as evidence.

The U.S.Supreme Court created the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule in the case of

The first 10 amendments to the Constitution are collectively called the __________.

___________ permits an officer to search based on the officer's sense of touch.

Which Chief Justice of the U.S.Supreme Court began to create exceptions to the exclusionary rule?

Police officers must provide Miranda warnings if they approach someone on the street and begin questioning.

The search and seizure clause is found in the ____________________ Amendment.

____________________ means that the officers acted with the honest belief that they were following the proper rules and therefore are not subject to the exclusionary rule.

Imagine you are a law enforcement officer who believes drugs are being sold in an apartment.Describe three different scenarios in which you could conduct a legal search of the apartment without a warrant.

Police rarely use deception when interrogating a suspect.

Criminal defendants' rights are found in the ____________________.

If an officer smells marijuana and sees smoke pouring out of a car window,she may search the car without a warrant.

In a search incident to a lawful arrest,the arrested person has waived her ____________________ rights.

The ____________________ doctrine,established by Hester v.United States in 1924,means that officers may use visible evidence in a yard to conduct a seizure.