Exam 17: Getting Ready to Analyze Data

SCENARIO 17-11 A logistic regression model was estimated in order to predict the probability that a randomly chosen university or college would be a private university using information on mean total Scholastic Aptitude Test score (SAT) at the university or college, the room and board expense measured in thousands of dollars (Room/Brd), and whether the TOEFL criterion is at least 550 (Toefl550 = 1 if yes, 0 otherwise.) The dependent variable, Y, is school type (Type = 1 if private and 0 otherwise). The Minitab output is given below: -Referring to Scenario 17-11, which of the following is the correct expression for the estimated model? a) $Y = - 27.118 + 0.015$ SAT $- 0.390$ Toefl $550 + 2.078$ Room / Brd b) $\hat { Y } = - 27.118 + 0.015 \mathrm { SAT } - 0.390$ Toefl550 $+ 2.078 \mathrm { Room } / \mathrm { Brd }$ c) $\ln ($ odds ratio $) = - 27.118 + 0.015$ SAT $- 0.390$ Toefl $550 + 2.078 \mathrm { Room } / \mathrm { Brd }$ d) $\ln ($ estimated odds ratio $) = - 27.118 + 0.015$ SAT $- 0.390$ Toefl $550 + 2.078 \mathrm { Room } / \mathrm { Brd }$

SCENARIO 17-1 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income), family size (Size), and education of the head of household (School). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet, income is measured in thousands of dollars, and education is in years. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Microsoft Excel output is provided below: SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.865 R Square 0.748 Adjusted R Square 0.726 Standard Error 5.195 Observations 50 ANOVA df SS MS F Signif F Regression 3605.7736 1201.9245 0.0000 Residual 1214.2264 26.3962 Total 49 4820.0000 Coeff StdError t Stat P -value Intercept -1.6335 5.8078 -0.281 0.7798 Income 0.4485 0.1137 3.9545 0.0003 Size 4.2615 0.8062 5.286 0.0001 School -0.6517 0.4319 -1.509 0.1383 -Referring to Scenario 17-1, when the builder used a simple linear regression model with house size (House) as the dependent variable and education (School) as the independent variable, he Obtained an r2 value of 23.0%. What additional percentage of the total variation in house size has Been explained by including family size and income in the multiple regression?

SCENARIO 17-12 The marketing manager for a nationally franchised lawn service company would like to study the characteristics that differentiate home owners who do and do not have a lawn service. A random sample of 30 home owners located in a suburban area near a large city was selected; 15 did not have a lawn service (code 0) and 15 had a lawn service (code 1). Additional information available concerning these 30 home owners includes family income (Income, in thousands of dollars), lawn size (Lawn Size, in thousands of square feet), attitude toward outdoor recreational activities (Atitude 0 = unfavorable, 1 = favorable), number of teenagers in the household (Teenager), and age of the head of the household (Age). The Minitab output is given below: -Referring to Scenario 17-12, what should be the decision ('reject' or 'do not reject') on the null hypothesis when testing whether Teenager makes a significant contribution to the model in the presence of the other independent variables at a 0.05 level of significance?

SCENARIO 17-5 You worked as an intern at We Always Win Car Insurance Company last summer. You notice that individual car insurance premiums depend very much on the age of the individual, the number of traffic tickets received by the individual, and the population density of the city in which the individual lives. You performed a regression analysis in EXCEL and obtained the following information: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.63 R Square 0.40 Adjusted R Square 0.23 Standard Error 50.00 Observations 15.00 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 3 5994.24 2.40 0.12 Residual 11 27496.82 Total 45479.54 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 99.0\% Upper 99.0\% Intercept 123.80 48.71 2.54 0.03 -27.47 275.07 AGE -0.82 0.87 -0.95 0.36 -3.51 1.87 TICKETS 21.25 10.66 1.99 0.07 -11.86 54.37 DENSITY -3.14 6.46 -0.49 0.64 -23.19 16.91 AGE -0.82 0.87 -0.95 0.36 -3.51 1.87 TICKETS 21.25 10.66 1.99 0.07 -11.86 54.37 DENSITY -3.14 6.46 -0.49 0.64 -23.19 16.91 -Referring to Scenario 17-5, the multiple regression model is significant at a 10% level of significance.

SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married: $1 =$ married, $0 =$ otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head: $1 =$ yes, $0 =$ no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: $1 =$ yes, $0 =$ no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination ( $R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 }$ (All raiables excopt $j$ ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively, $0.2807$ , $0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958$ , and $0.1201$ . Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7035 R Square 0.4949 Adjusted R 0.4030 Square Standard 18.4861 Error Observations 40 $\text { ANOVA }$ Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 32.6595 23.18302 1.4088 0.1683 -14.5067 79.8257 Age 1.2915 0.3599 3.5883 0.0011 0.5592 2.0238 Edu -1.3537 1.1766 -1.1504 0.2582 -3.7476 1.0402 Job Yr 0.6171 0.5940 1.0389 0.3064 -0.5914 1.8257 Married -5.2189 7.6068 -0.6861 0.4974 -20.6950 10.2571 Head -14.2978 7.6479 -1.8695 0.0704 -29.8575 1.2618 Manager -24.8203 11.6932 -2.1226 0.0414 -48.6102 -1.0303 -Referring to Scenario 17-10 and using both Model 1 and Model 2, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the independent variables that are not significant individually are also not significant as a group in explaining the variation in the dependent variable at a 5% level of significance?

The Tampa International Airport (TIA) has been criticized for the waiting times associated with departing flights. While the critics acknowledge that many flights have little or no waiting times, Their complaints deal more specifically with the longer waits attributed to some flights. The critics Are interested in showing, mathematically, exactly what the problems are. Which type of Distribution would best model the waiting times of the departing flights at TIA?

Suppose the light bulbs in a factory burn out at a rate of 50 bulbs per month. Which of the following distributions would you use to determine the probability that the next two light bulbs Will burn out 2 days apart?

SCENARIO 17-9 What are the factors that determine the acceleration time (in sec.) from 0 to 60 miles per hour of a car? Data on the following variables for 171 different vehicle models were collected: Accel Time: Acceleration time in sec. Cargo Vol: Cargo volume in cu. ft. HP: Horsepower MPG: Miles per gallon SUV: 1 if the vehicle model is an SUV with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 Sedan: 1 if the vehicle model is a sedan with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 The regression results using acceleration time as the dependent variable and the remaining variables as the independent variables are presented below. -Referring to Scenario 17-9, the 0 to 60 miles per hour acceleration time of a coupe is predicted to be 0.7679 seconds lower than that of an SUV.

A political pollster randomly selects a sample of 100 voters each day for 8 successive days and asks how many will vote for the incumbent. The pollster wishes to see if the percentage favoring The incumbent candidate is too erratic. Which of the following would be the most appropriate Analysis to perform?

SCENARIO 17-9 What are the factors that determine the acceleration time (in sec.) from 0 to 60 miles per hour of a car? Data on the following variables for 171 different vehicle models were collected: Accel Time: Acceleration time in sec. Cargo Vol: Cargo volume in cu. ft. HP: Horsepower MPG: Miles per gallon SUV: 1 if the vehicle model is an SUV with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 Sedan: 1 if the vehicle model is a sedan with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 The regression results using acceleration time as the dependent variable and the remaining variables as the independent variables are presented below. -Referring to Scenario 17-9, there is enough evidence to conclude that Cargo Vol makes a significant contribution to the regression model in the presence of the other independent variables at a 5% level of significance.

Data mining uses various techniques to extract useful information from huge depositories of data.

A buyer for a manufacturing plant suspects that his primary supplier of raw materials is overcharging. In order to determine if his suspicion is correct, he contacts a second supplier and Asks for the prices on various identical materials. He wants to compare these prices with those of His primary supplier. He collected data on 6 different materials from both suppliers. He believes That the differences are normally distributed. Which of the following tests will be the most Appropriate?

SCENARIO 17-3 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $\$ 1,000$ ) and 4 variables: age $\left( X _ { 1 } = \mathrm { Age } \right)$ , experience in the field $\left( X _ { 2 } = \right.$ Exper $)$ , number of degrees $\left( X _ { 3 } = \right.$ Degrees $)$ , and number of previous jobs in the field ( $X _ { 4 } =$ Prevjobs). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output: SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.992 R Square 0.984 Adjusted R Square 0.979 Standard Error 2.26743 Observations 20 df SS MS F Signif F Regression 4 4609.83164 1152.45791 224.160 0.0001 Residual 15 77.11836 5.14122 Total 19 4686.95000 Coeff StdError Stat P-value Intercept -9.611198 2.77988638 -3.457 0.0035 Age 1.327695 0.11491930 11.553 0.0001 Exper -0.106705 0.14265559 -0.748 0.4660 Degrees 7.311332 0.80324187 9.102 0.0001 Prevjobs -0.504168 0.44771573 -1.126 0.2778 -Referring to Scenario 17-3, the F test for the significance of the entire regression performed at a level of significance of 0.01 leads to a rejection of the null hypothesis.

SCENARIO 17-9 What are the factors that determine the acceleration time (in sec.) from 0 to 60 miles per hour of a car? Data on the following variables for 171 different vehicle models were collected: Accel Time: Acceleration time in sec. Cargo Vol: Cargo volume in cu. ft. HP: Horsepower MPG: Miles per gallon SUV: 1 if the vehicle model is an SUV with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 Sedan: 1 if the vehicle model is a sedan with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 The regression results using acceleration time as the dependent variable and the remaining variables as the independent variables are presented below. -Referring to Scenario 17-9, which of the following assumptions is most likely violated based on the residual plot of the residuals versus predicted Y?

SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married: $1 =$ married, $0 =$ otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head: $1 =$ yes, $0 =$ no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: $1 =$ yes, $0 =$ no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination ( $R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 }$ (All raiables excopt $j$ ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively, $0.2807$ , $0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958$ , and $0.1201$ . Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7035 R Square 0.4949 Adjusted R 0.4030 Square Standard 18.4861 Error Observations 40 $\text { ANOVA }$ Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 32.6595 23.18302 1.4088 0.1683 -14.5067 79.8257 Age 1.2915 0.3599 3.5883 0.0011 0.5592 2.0238 Edu -1.3537 1.1766 -1.1504 0.2582 -3.7476 1.0402 Job Yr 0.6171 0.5940 1.0389 0.3064 -0.5914 1.8257 Married -5.2189 7.6068 -0.6861 0.4974 -20.6950 10.2571 Head -14.2978 7.6479 -1.8695 0.0704 -29.8575 1.2618 Manager -24.8203 11.6932 -2.1226 0.0414 -48.6102 -1.0303 -Referring to Scenario 17-10 Model 1, ________ of the variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by whether the worker is in a management position while controlling for the other independent variables.

SCENARIO 17-14 The treemap below shows the amounts (size) measured in billions of US dollars and percentage changes from prior year (color) of business-to-consumer ecommerce sales last year for North America, Asia Pacific, Western Europe, Central & Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa. -Referring to Scenario 17-14, the Western Europe region has the largest amount of business-to-consumer ecommerce sales last year.

SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married: $1 =$ married, $0 =$ otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head: $1 =$ yes, $0 =$ no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: $1 =$ yes, $0 =$ no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination ( $R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 }$ (All raiables excopt $j$ ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively, $0.2807$ , $0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958$ , and $0.1201$ . Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7035 R Square 0.4949 Adjusted R 0.4030 Square Standard 18.4861 Error Observations 40 $\text { ANOVA }$ Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 32.6595 23.18302 1.4088 0.1683 -14.5067 79.8257 Age 1.2915 0.3599 3.5883 0.0011 0.5592 2.0238 Edu -1.3537 1.1766 -1.1504 0.2582 -3.7476 1.0402 Job Yr 0.6171 0.5940 1.0389 0.3064 -0.5914 1.8257 Married -5.2189 7.6068 -0.6861 0.4974 -20.6950 10.2571 Head -14.2978 7.6479 -1.8695 0.0704 -29.8575 1.2618 Manager -24.8203 11.6932 -2.1226 0.0414 -48.6102 -1.0303 -Referring to Scenario 17-10 Model 1, predict the number of weeks being unemployed due to a layoff for a worker who is a thirty-year old, has 10 years of education, has 15 years of experience at the previous job, is married, is the head of household and is a manager.

SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married: $1 =$ married, $0 =$ otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head: $1 =$ yes, $0 =$ no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: $1 =$ yes, $0 =$ no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination ( $R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 }$ (All raiables excopt $j$ ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively, $0.2807$ , $0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958$ , and $0.1201$ . Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7035 R Square 0.4949 Adjusted R 0.4030 Square Standard 18.4861 Error Observations 40 $\text { ANOVA }$ Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 32.6595 23.18302 1.4088 0.1683 -14.5067 79.8257 Age 1.2915 0.3599 3.5883 0.0011 0.5592 2.0238 Edu -1.3537 1.1766 -1.1504 0.2582 -3.7476 1.0402 Job Yr 0.6171 0.5940 1.0389 0.3064 -0.5914 1.8257 Married -5.2189 7.6068 -0.6861 0.4974 -20.6950 10.2571 Head -14.2978 7.6479 -1.8695 0.0704 -29.8575 1.2618 Manager -24.8203 11.6932 -2.1226 0.0414 -48.6102 -1.0303 -Referring to Scenario 17-10 Model 1, which of the following is the correct null hypothesis to test whether being married or not makes a difference in the mean number of weeks a worker is Unemployed due to a layoff while holding constant the effect of all the other independent Variables? a) $H _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 1 } = 0$ b) $H _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 2 } = 0$ c) $H _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 3 } = 0$ d) $H _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 4 } = 0$

SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married: $1 =$ married, $0 =$ otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head: $1 =$ yes, $0 =$ no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: $1 =$ yes, $0 =$ no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination ( $R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 }$ (All raiables excopt $j$ ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively, $0.2807$ , $0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958$ , and $0.1201$ . Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7035 R Square 0.4949 Adjusted R 0.4030 Square Standard 18.4861 Error Observations 40 $\text { ANOVA }$ Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 32.6595 23.18302 1.4088 0.1683 -14.5067 79.8257 Age 1.2915 0.3599 3.5883 0.0011 0.5592 2.0238 Edu -1.3537 1.1766 -1.1504 0.2582 -3.7476 1.0402 Job Yr 0.6171 0.5940 1.0389 0.3064 -0.5914 1.8257 Married -5.2189 7.6068 -0.6861 0.4974 -20.6950 10.2571 Head -14.2978 7.6479 -1.8695 0.0704 -29.8575 1.2618 Manager -24.8203 11.6932 -2.1226 0.0414 -48.6102 -1.0303 -Referring to Scenario 17-10 Model 1, which of the following is a correct statement?

An insurance company evaluates many variables about a person before deciding on an appropriate rate for automobile insurance. A representative from a local insurance agency selected a random sample of 100 insured drivers and recorded, X, the amount of claims each made in the last 3 years. A Pareto chart can be used to present this information.