Exam 17: Getting Ready to Analyze Data

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

SCENARIO 17-9 What are the factors that determine the acceleration time (in sec.) from 0 to 60 miles per hour of a car? Data on the following variables for 171 different vehicle models were collected: Accel Time: Acceleration time in sec. Cargo Vol: Cargo volume in cu. ft. HP: Horsepower MPG: Miles per gallon SUV: 1 if the vehicle model is an SUV with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 Sedan: 1 if the vehicle model is a sedan with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 The regression results using acceleration time as the dependent variable and the remaining variables as the independent variables are presented below. SCENARIO 17-9 What are the factors that determine the acceleration time (in sec.) from 0 to 60 miles per hour of a car? Data on the following variables for 171 different vehicle models were collected: Accel Time: Acceleration time in sec. Cargo Vol: Cargo volume in cu. ft. HP: Horsepower MPG: Miles per gallon SUV: 1 if the vehicle model is an SUV with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 Sedan: 1 if the vehicle model is a sedan with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 The regression results using acceleration time as the dependent variable and the remaining variables as the independent variables are presented below.     -Referring to Scenario 17-9, the errors (residuals) appear to be right-skewed. SCENARIO 17-9 What are the factors that determine the acceleration time (in sec.) from 0 to 60 miles per hour of a car? Data on the following variables for 171 different vehicle models were collected: Accel Time: Acceleration time in sec. Cargo Vol: Cargo volume in cu. ft. HP: Horsepower MPG: Miles per gallon SUV: 1 if the vehicle model is an SUV with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 Sedan: 1 if the vehicle model is a sedan with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 The regression results using acceleration time as the dependent variable and the remaining variables as the independent variables are presented below.     -Referring to Scenario 17-9, the errors (residuals) appear to be right-skewed. -Referring to Scenario 17-9, the errors (residuals) appear to be right-skewed.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(77)

SCENARIO 17-2 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y)( Y ) . To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 4 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit (X1)\left( X _ { 1 } \right) , the amount of insulation in inches (X2)\left( X _ { 2 } \right) , the number of windows in the house (X3)\left( X _ { 3 } \right) , and the age of the furnace in years (X4)\left( X _ { 4 } \right) . Given below are the EXCEL outputs of two regression models. Model 1 Regression Statistics R Square 0.8080 Adjusted R Square 0.7568 Observations 20  ANOVA \text { ANOVA } df SS MS F Significance F Regression 4 169503.4241 42375.86 15.7874 0.0000 Residual 15 40262.3259 2684.155 Total 19 209765.75 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 90.0\% Upper 90.0\% Intereept 421.4277 77.8614 5.4125 0.0000 284.9327 557.9227 (Temperature) -4.5098 0.8129 -5.5476 0.0000 -5.9349 -3.0847 (Insulation) -14.9029 5.0508 -2.9505 0.0099 -23.7573 -6.0485 (Windows) 0.2151 4.8675 0.0442 0.9653 -8.3181 8.7484 (Furnace Age) 6.3780 4.1026 1.5546 0.1408 -0.8140 13.5702  Model 2\text { Model } 2 Regression Statistics R Square 0.7768 Adjusted R Square 0.7506 Observations 20  ANOVA \text { ANOVA }  SCENARIO 17-2 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars  ( Y ) . To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 4 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit  \left( X _ { 1 } \right) , the amount of insulation in inches  \left( X _ { 2 } \right) , the number of windows in the house  \left( X _ { 3 } \right) , and the age of the furnace in years  \left( X _ { 4 } \right) . Given below are the EXCEL outputs of two regression models.  Model 1  \begin{array}{lr} \hline{\text { Regression Statistics }} \\ \hline \text { R Square } & 0.8080 \\ \text { Adjusted R Square } & 0.7568 \\ \text { Observations } & 20 \\ \hline \end{array}   \text { ANOVA }   \begin{array}{lrrrrrr} \hline & d f & & {\text { SS }} & M S & F & \text { Significance } F \\ \hline \text { Regression } && 4 & 169503.4241 & 42375.86 & 15.7874 & 0.0000 \\ \text { Residual } && 15 & 40262.3259 & 2684.155 & & \\ \text { Total } && 19 & 209765.75 & & & \\ \hline \end{array}    \begin{array}{lrrrrrrr} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &{\text { t Stat }} & \text { P-value } & \text { Lower 90.0\% } & \text { Upper 90.0\% } \\ \hline \text { Intereept } & 421.4277 & 77.8614 & 5.4125 & 0.0000 & 284.9327 & 557.9227 \\ \mathrm{X}_{1} \text { (Temperature) } & -4.5098 & 0.8129 & -5.5476 & 0.0000 & -5.9349 & -3.0847 \\ \mathrm{X}_{2} \text { (Insulation) } & -14.9029 & 5.0508 & -2.9505 & 0.0099 & -23.7573 & -6.0485 \\ \mathrm{X}_{3} \text { (Windows) } & 0.2151 & 4.8675 & 0.0442 & 0.9653 & -8.3181 & 8.7484 \\ \mathrm{X}_{4} \text { (Furnace Age) } & 6.3780 & 4.1026 & 1.5546 & 0.1408 & -0.8140 & 13.5702 \end{array}    \text { Model } 2    \begin{array}{lr} \hline {\text { Regression Statistics }} \\ \hline \text { R Square } & 0.7768 \\ \text { Adjusted R Square } & 0.7506 \\ \text { Observations } & 20 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { ANOVA }      \begin{array}{lrrllrr} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } & t \text { Stat } & \text { P-value } & \text { Lower 95\% } & \text { Upper 95\% } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 489.3227 & 43.9826 & 11.1253 & 0.0000 & 396.5273 & 582.1180 \\ \mathrm{X}_{1} \text { (Temperature) } & -5.1103 & 0.6951 & -7.3515 & 0.0000 & -6.5769 & -3.6437 \\ \mathrm{X}_{2} \text { (Insulation) } & -14.7195 & 4.8864 & -3.0123 & 0.0078 & -25.0290 & -4.4099 \end{array}  -Referring to Scenario 17-2, what is the value of the partial F test statistic for  H _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 3 } = \beta _ { 4 } = 0 \text { vs. } H _ { 1 } : \text { At least one } \beta _ { j } \neq 0 , j = 3,4  ? Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 489.3227 43.9826 11.1253 0.0000 396.5273 582.1180 (Temperature) -5.1103 0.6951 -7.3515 0.0000 -6.5769 -3.6437 (Insulation) -14.7195 4.8864 -3.0123 0.0078 -25.0290 -4.4099 -Referring to Scenario 17-2, what is the value of the partial F test statistic for H0:β3=β4=0 vs. H1: At least one βj≠0,j=3,4H _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 3 } = \beta _ { 4 } = 0 \text { vs. } H _ { 1 } : \text { At least one } \beta _ { j } \neq 0 , j = 3,4 ?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(80)

A quality control manager at a plant that produces o-rings is concerned about whether the diameter of the o-rings that are produced is conformable to the specification. She has calculated That the average diameter of the o-rings is 4.2 centimeters. She also knows that approximately 95% of the o-rings have diameters fall between 3.2 and 5.2 centimeters and almost all of the o- Rings have diameters between 2.7 and 5.7 centimeters. When modeling the diameters of the o- Rings, which distribution should the scientists use?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(93)

SCENARIO 17-14 The treemap below shows the amounts (size) measured in billions of US dollars and percentage changes from prior year (color) of business-to-consumer ecommerce sales last year for North America, Asia Pacific, Western Europe, Central & Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa. SCENARIO 17-14 The treemap below shows the amounts (size) measured in billions of US dollars and percentage changes from prior year (color) of business-to-consumer ecommerce sales last year for North America, Asia Pacific, Western Europe, Central & Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa.   -Referring to Scenario 17-14, the Asia Pacific region has the largest amount of business-to-consumer ecommerce sales last year. -Referring to Scenario 17-14, the Asia Pacific region has the largest amount of business-to-consumer ecommerce sales last year.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(95)

SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married: 1=1 = married, 0=0 = otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head: 1=1 = yes, 0=0 = no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1=1 = yes, 0=0 = no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination ( Ry2R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 } (All raiables excopt jj ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively, 0.28070.2807 , 0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.09580.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958 , and 0.12010.1201 . Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7035 R Square 0.4949 Adjusted R 0.4030 Square Standard 18.4861 Error Observations 40  ANOVA \text { ANOVA }  SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married:  1 =  married,  0 =  otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head:  1 =  yes,  0 =  no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager:  1 =  yes,  0 =  no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination (  R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 }  (All raiables excopt  j  ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively,  0.2807 ,  0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958 , and  0.1201 .   \begin{array}{lr} \hline{\text { Regression Statistics }} \\ \hline \text { Multiple R } & 0.7035 \\ \text { R Square } & 0.4949 \\ \text { Adjusted R } & 0.4030 \\ \text { Square } & \\ \text { Standard } & 18.4861 \\ \text { Error } & \\ \text { Observations } & 40 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { ANOVA }       \begin{array}{l} \begin{array} { l r r r r r r }  \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } & { t \text { Stat } } & \text { P-value } & \text { Lower 95\% } & \text { Upper 95\% } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 32.6595 & 23.18302 & 1.4088 & 0.1683 & - 14.5067 & 79.8257 \\ \text { Age } & 1.2915 & 0.3599 & 3.5883 & 0.0011 & 0.5592 & 2.0238 \\ \text { Edu } & - 1.3537 & 1.1766 & - 1.1504 & 0.2582 & - 3.7476 & 1.0402 \\ \text { Job Yr } & 0.6171 & 0.5940 & 1.0389 & 0.3064 & - 0.5914 & 1.8257 \\ \text { Married } & - 5.2189 & 7.6068 & - 0.6861 & 0.4974 & - 20.6950 & 10.2571 \\ \text { Head } & - 14.2978 & 7.6479 & - 1.8695 & 0.0704 & - 29.8575 & 1.2618 \\ \text { Manager } & - 24.8203 & 11.6932 & - 2.1226 & 0.0414 & - 48.6102 & - 1.0303 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}  -Referring to Scenario 17-10 Model 1, the alternative hypothesis  H _ { 1 } \text { : At least one of } \beta _ { j } \neq 0  for j = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 implies that the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff is related to all of the explanatory variables. Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 32.6595 23.18302 1.4088 0.1683 -14.5067 79.8257 Age 1.2915 0.3599 3.5883 0.0011 0.5592 2.0238 Edu -1.3537 1.1766 -1.1504 0.2582 -3.7476 1.0402 Job Yr 0.6171 0.5940 1.0389 0.3064 -0.5914 1.8257 Married -5.2189 7.6068 -0.6861 0.4974 -20.6950 10.2571 Head -14.2978 7.6479 -1.8695 0.0704 -29.8575 1.2618 Manager -24.8203 11.6932 -2.1226 0.0414 -48.6102 -1.0303 -Referring to Scenario 17-10 Model 1, the alternative hypothesis H1 : At least one of βj≠0H _ { 1 } \text { : At least one of } \beta _ { j } \neq 0 for j = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 implies that the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff is related to all of the explanatory variables.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(82)

Successful use of a regression tree requires a precise description of the parameters of the tree.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(89)

Which of the following is NOT among the three broad categories of analytic methods?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(76)

SCENARIO 17-1 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income), family size (Size), and education of the head of household (School). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet, income is measured in thousands of dollars, and education is in years. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Microsoft Excel output is provided below: SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.865 R Square 0.748 Adjusted R Square 0.726 Standard Error 5.195 Observations 50 ANOVA df SS MS F Signif F Regression 3605.7736 1201.9245 0.0000 Residual 1214.2264 26.3962 Total 49 4820.0000 Coeff StdError t Stat P -value Intercept -1.6335 5.8078 -0.281 0.7798 Income 0.4485 0.1137 3.9545 0.0003 Size 4.2615 0.8062 5.286 0.0001 School -0.6517 0.4319 -1.509 0.1383 -Referring to Scenario 17-1, what is the value of the calculated F test statistic that is missing from the output for testing whether the whole regression model is significant?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(74)

SCENARIO 17-3 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000\$ 1,000 ) and 4 variables: age (X1=Age)\left( X _ { 1 } = \mathrm { Age } \right) , experience in the field (X2=\left( X _ { 2 } = \right. Exper )) , number of degrees (X3=\left( X _ { 3 } = \right. Degrees )) , and number of previous jobs in the field ( X4=X _ { 4 } = Prevjobs). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output: SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.992 R Square 0.984 Adjusted R Square 0.979 Standard Error 2.26743 Observations 20 df SS MS F Signif F Regression 4 4609.83164 1152.45791 224.160 0.0001 Residual 15 77.11836 5.14122 Total 19 4686.95000 Coeff StdError Stat P-value Intercept -9.611198 2.77988638 -3.457 0.0035 Age 1.327695 0.11491930 11.553 0.0001 Exper -0.106705 0.14265559 -0.748 0.4660 Degrees 7.311332 0.80324187 9.102 0.0001 Prevjobs -0.504168 0.44771573 -1.126 0.2778 -Referring to Scenario 17-3, the analyst wants to use a t test to test for the significance of the coefficient of X3X _ { 3 } . The value of the test statistic is ________.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(84)

An agronomist wants to compare the crop yield of 3 varieties of chickpea seeds. She plants all 3 varieties of the seeds on each of 5 different patches of fields. She then measures the crop yield in Bushels per acre. Which of the following tests will be the most appropriate to find out if there is Any difference in crop yield among the 3 varieties?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(82)

SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married: 1=1 = married, 0=0 = otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head: 1=1 = yes, 0=0 = no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1=1 = yes, 0=0 = no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination ( Ry2R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 } (All raiables excopt jj ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively, 0.28070.2807 , 0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.09580.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958 , and 0.12010.1201 . Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7035 R Square 0.4949 Adjusted R 0.4030 Square Standard 18.4861 Error Observations 40  ANOVA \text { ANOVA }  SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married:  1 =  married,  0 =  otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head:  1 =  yes,  0 =  no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager:  1 =  yes,  0 =  no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination (  R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 }  (All raiables excopt  j  ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively,  0.2807 ,  0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958 , and  0.1201 .   \begin{array}{lr} \hline{\text { Regression Statistics }} \\ \hline \text { Multiple R } & 0.7035 \\ \text { R Square } & 0.4949 \\ \text { Adjusted R } & 0.4030 \\ \text { Square } & \\ \text { Standard } & 18.4861 \\ \text { Error } & \\ \text { Observations } & 40 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { ANOVA }       \begin{array}{l} \begin{array} { l r r r r r r }  \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } & { t \text { Stat } } & \text { P-value } & \text { Lower 95\% } & \text { Upper 95\% } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 32.6595 & 23.18302 & 1.4088 & 0.1683 & - 14.5067 & 79.8257 \\ \text { Age } & 1.2915 & 0.3599 & 3.5883 & 0.0011 & 0.5592 & 2.0238 \\ \text { Edu } & - 1.3537 & 1.1766 & - 1.1504 & 0.2582 & - 3.7476 & 1.0402 \\ \text { Job Yr } & 0.6171 & 0.5940 & 1.0389 & 0.3064 & - 0.5914 & 1.8257 \\ \text { Married } & - 5.2189 & 7.6068 & - 0.6861 & 0.4974 & - 20.6950 & 10.2571 \\ \text { Head } & - 14.2978 & 7.6479 & - 1.8695 & 0.0704 & - 29.8575 & 1.2618 \\ \text { Manager } & - 24.8203 & 11.6932 & - 2.1226 & 0.0414 & - 48.6102 & - 1.0303 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}  -Referring to Scenario 17-10 Model 1, the null hypothesis  H _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 1 } = \beta _ { 2 } = \beta _ { 3 } = \beta _ { 4 } = \beta _ { 5 } = \beta _ { 6 } = 0  implies that the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff is not related to one of the explanatory variables. Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 32.6595 23.18302 1.4088 0.1683 -14.5067 79.8257 Age 1.2915 0.3599 3.5883 0.0011 0.5592 2.0238 Edu -1.3537 1.1766 -1.1504 0.2582 -3.7476 1.0402 Job Yr 0.6171 0.5940 1.0389 0.3064 -0.5914 1.8257 Married -5.2189 7.6068 -0.6861 0.4974 -20.6950 10.2571 Head -14.2978 7.6479 -1.8695 0.0704 -29.8575 1.2618 Manager -24.8203 11.6932 -2.1226 0.0414 -48.6102 -1.0303 -Referring to Scenario 17-10 Model 1, the null hypothesis H0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5=β6=0H _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 1 } = \beta _ { 2 } = \beta _ { 3 } = \beta _ { 4 } = \beta _ { 5 } = \beta _ { 6 } = 0 implies that the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff is not related to one of the explanatory variables.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(61)

SCENARIO 17-8 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixth- grade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), daily mean of the percentage of students attending class (% Attendance), mean teacher salary in dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y=%Y = \% Passing as the dependent variable, X1=%X _ { 1 } = \% Attendance, X2=X _ { 2 } = Salaries and X3=X _ { 3 } = Spending: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7930 R Square 0.6288 Adjusted R 0.6029 Square Standard 10.4570 Error Observations 47 ANOVA  SCENARIO 17-8 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixth- grade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), daily mean of the percentage of students attending class (% Attendance), mean teacher salary in dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with  Y = \%  Passing as the dependent variable,  X _ { 1 } = \%  Attendance,  X _ { 2 } =  Salaries and  X _ { 3 } =  Spending:   \begin{array}{lr} \hline{\text { Regression Statistics }} \\ \hline \text { Multiple R } & 0.7930 \\ \text { R Square } & 0.6288 \\ \text { Adjusted R } & 0.6029 \\ \text { Square } & \\ \text { Standard } & 10.4570 \\ \text { Error } & \\ \text { Observations } & 47 \\ \hline \end{array}    ANOVA     \begin{array}{lrrrrrr} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Standard } \\ \text { Error } \end{array} & \text { t Stat } & \text { P-value } & \text { Lower 95\% } & \text { Upper 95\% } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & -753.4225 & 101.1149 & -7.4511 & 0.0000 & -957.3401 & -549.5050 \\ \text { \% Attendance } & 8.5014 & 1.0771 & 7.8929 & 0.0000 & 6.3292 & 10.6735 \\ \text { Salary } & 0.000000685 & 0.0006 & 0.0011 & 0.9991 & -0.0013 & 0.0013 \\ \text { Spending } & 0.0060 & 0.0046 & 1.2879 & 0.2047 & -0.0034 & 0.0153 \\ \hline \end{array}  -Referring to Scenario 17-8, what is the p-value of the test statistic when testing whether instructional spending per pupil has any effect on percentage of students passing the proficiency test, taking into account the effect of all the other independent variables? Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept -753.4225 101.1149 -7.4511 0.0000 -957.3401 -549.5050 \% Attendance 8.5014 1.0771 7.8929 0.0000 6.3292 10.6735 Salary 0.000000685 0.0006 0.0011 0.9991 -0.0013 0.0013 Spending 0.0060 0.0046 1.2879 0.2047 -0.0034 0.0153 -Referring to Scenario 17-8, what is the p-value of the test statistic when testing whether instructional spending per pupil has any effect on percentage of students passing the proficiency test, taking into account the effect of all the other independent variables?

(Short Answer)
5.0/5
(94)

SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married: 1=1 = married, 0=0 = otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head: 1=1 = yes, 0=0 = no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1=1 = yes, 0=0 = no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination ( Ry2R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 } (All raiables excopt jj ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively, 0.28070.2807 , 0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.09580.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958 , and 0.12010.1201 . Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7035 R Square 0.4949 Adjusted R 0.4030 Square Standard 18.4861 Error Observations 40  ANOVA \text { ANOVA }  SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married:  1 =  married,  0 =  otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head:  1 =  yes,  0 =  no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager:  1 =  yes,  0 =  no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination (  R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 }  (All raiables excopt  j  ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively,  0.2807 ,  0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958 , and  0.1201 .   \begin{array}{lr} \hline{\text { Regression Statistics }} \\ \hline \text { Multiple R } & 0.7035 \\ \text { R Square } & 0.4949 \\ \text { Adjusted R } & 0.4030 \\ \text { Square } & \\ \text { Standard } & 18.4861 \\ \text { Error } & \\ \text { Observations } & 40 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { ANOVA }       \begin{array}{l} \begin{array} { l r r r r r r }  \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } & { t \text { Stat } } & \text { P-value } & \text { Lower 95\% } & \text { Upper 95\% } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 32.6595 & 23.18302 & 1.4088 & 0.1683 & - 14.5067 & 79.8257 \\ \text { Age } & 1.2915 & 0.3599 & 3.5883 & 0.0011 & 0.5592 & 2.0238 \\ \text { Edu } & - 1.3537 & 1.1766 & - 1.1504 & 0.2582 & - 3.7476 & 1.0402 \\ \text { Job Yr } & 0.6171 & 0.5940 & 1.0389 & 0.3064 & - 0.5914 & 1.8257 \\ \text { Married } & - 5.2189 & 7.6068 & - 0.6861 & 0.4974 & - 20.6950 & 10.2571 \\ \text { Head } & - 14.2978 & 7.6479 & - 1.8695 & 0.0704 & - 29.8575 & 1.2618 \\ \text { Manager } & - 24.8203 & 11.6932 & - 2.1226 & 0.0414 & - 48.6102 & - 1.0303 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}  -Referring to Scenario 17-10 Model 1, what are the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval estimate for the difference in the mean number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff between a worker who is married and one who is not after taking into consideration the effect of all the other independent variables? Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 32.6595 23.18302 1.4088 0.1683 -14.5067 79.8257 Age 1.2915 0.3599 3.5883 0.0011 0.5592 2.0238 Edu -1.3537 1.1766 -1.1504 0.2582 -3.7476 1.0402 Job Yr 0.6171 0.5940 1.0389 0.3064 -0.5914 1.8257 Married -5.2189 7.6068 -0.6861 0.4974 -20.6950 10.2571 Head -14.2978 7.6479 -1.8695 0.0704 -29.8575 1.2618 Manager -24.8203 11.6932 -2.1226 0.0414 -48.6102 -1.0303 -Referring to Scenario 17-10 Model 1, what are the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval estimate for the difference in the mean number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff between a worker who is married and one who is not after taking into consideration the effect of all the other independent variables?

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(84)

SCENARIO 17-8 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixth- grade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), daily mean of the percentage of students attending class (% Attendance), mean teacher salary in dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y=%Y = \% Passing as the dependent variable, X1=%X _ { 1 } = \% Attendance, X2=X _ { 2 } = Salaries and X3=X _ { 3 } = Spending: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7930 R Square 0.6288 Adjusted R 0.6029 Square Standard 10.4570 Error Observations 47 ANOVA  SCENARIO 17-8 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixth- grade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), daily mean of the percentage of students attending class (% Attendance), mean teacher salary in dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with  Y = \%  Passing as the dependent variable,  X _ { 1 } = \%  Attendance,  X _ { 2 } =  Salaries and  X _ { 3 } =  Spending:   \begin{array}{lr} \hline{\text { Regression Statistics }} \\ \hline \text { Multiple R } & 0.7930 \\ \text { R Square } & 0.6288 \\ \text { Adjusted R } & 0.6029 \\ \text { Square } & \\ \text { Standard } & 10.4570 \\ \text { Error } & \\ \text { Observations } & 47 \\ \hline \end{array}    ANOVA     \begin{array}{lrrrrrr} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Standard } \\ \text { Error } \end{array} & \text { t Stat } & \text { P-value } & \text { Lower 95\% } & \text { Upper 95\% } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & -753.4225 & 101.1149 & -7.4511 & 0.0000 & -957.3401 & -549.5050 \\ \text { \% Attendance } & 8.5014 & 1.0771 & 7.8929 & 0.0000 & 6.3292 & 10.6735 \\ \text { Salary } & 0.000000685 & 0.0006 & 0.0011 & 0.9991 & -0.0013 & 0.0013 \\ \text { Spending } & 0.0060 & 0.0046 & 1.2879 & 0.2047 & -0.0034 & 0.0153 \\ \hline \end{array}  -Referring to Scenario 17-8, you can conclude that instructional spending per pupil has no impact on the mean percentage of students passing the proficiency test, taking into account the effect of all the other independent variables, at a 5% level of significance using the 95% confidence interval estimate for  \beta _ { 3 }  . Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept -753.4225 101.1149 -7.4511 0.0000 -957.3401 -549.5050 \% Attendance 8.5014 1.0771 7.8929 0.0000 6.3292 10.6735 Salary 0.000000685 0.0006 0.0011 0.9991 -0.0013 0.0013 Spending 0.0060 0.0046 1.2879 0.2047 -0.0034 0.0153 -Referring to Scenario 17-8, you can conclude that instructional spending per pupil has no impact on the mean percentage of students passing the proficiency test, taking into account the effect of all the other independent variables, at a 5% level of significance using the 95% confidence interval estimate for β3\beta _ { 3 } .

(True/False)
4.8/5
(74)

SCENARIO 17-9 What are the factors that determine the acceleration time (in sec.) from 0 to 60 miles per hour of a car? Data on the following variables for 171 different vehicle models were collected: Accel Time: Acceleration time in sec. Cargo Vol: Cargo volume in cu. ft. HP: Horsepower MPG: Miles per gallon SUV: 1 if the vehicle model is an SUV with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 Sedan: 1 if the vehicle model is a sedan with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 The regression results using acceleration time as the dependent variable and the remaining variables as the independent variables are presented below. SCENARIO 17-9 What are the factors that determine the acceleration time (in sec.) from 0 to 60 miles per hour of a car? Data on the following variables for 171 different vehicle models were collected: Accel Time: Acceleration time in sec. Cargo Vol: Cargo volume in cu. ft. HP: Horsepower MPG: Miles per gallon SUV: 1 if the vehicle model is an SUV with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 Sedan: 1 if the vehicle model is a sedan with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 The regression results using acceleration time as the dependent variable and the remaining variables as the independent variables are presented below.     -Referring to Scenario 17-9, the 0 to 60 miles per hour acceleration time of a sedan is predicted to be 0.1252 seconds higher than that of an SUV. SCENARIO 17-9 What are the factors that determine the acceleration time (in sec.) from 0 to 60 miles per hour of a car? Data on the following variables for 171 different vehicle models were collected: Accel Time: Acceleration time in sec. Cargo Vol: Cargo volume in cu. ft. HP: Horsepower MPG: Miles per gallon SUV: 1 if the vehicle model is an SUV with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 Sedan: 1 if the vehicle model is a sedan with Coupe as the base when SUV and Sedan are both 0 The regression results using acceleration time as the dependent variable and the remaining variables as the independent variables are presented below.     -Referring to Scenario 17-9, the 0 to 60 miles per hour acceleration time of a sedan is predicted to be 0.1252 seconds higher than that of an SUV. -Referring to Scenario 17-9, the 0 to 60 miles per hour acceleration time of a sedan is predicted to be 0.1252 seconds higher than that of an SUV.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(81)

Data on the amount of time spent studying for a particular exam at a high school were collected for 150 students. You want to know half of the students spent at least how much time studying For that exam. Which of the following would you compute?

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(72)

The amount of juice that can be squeezed from a randomly selected orange out a box of oranges with approximately the same size can most likely be modeled by which of the following Distributions?

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(85)

Some consider bullet graphs little more than examples of chartjunk, even as many decision makers request them due to their visual appeal, due to the amount of the space they consumes.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(74)

Most information design specialists prefer bullet graphs over gauges because bullet graphs foster the direct comparison of each measurement.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(95)

SCENARIO 17-1 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income), family size (Size), and education of the head of household (School). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet, income is measured in thousands of dollars, and education is in years. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Microsoft Excel output is provided below: SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.865 R Square 0.748 Adjusted R Square 0.726 Standard Error 5.195 Observations 50 ANOVA df SS MS F Signif F Regression 3605.7736 1201.9245 0.0000 Residual 1214.2264 26.3962 Total 49 4820.0000 Coeff StdError t Stat P -value Intercept -1.6335 5.8078 -0.281 0.7798 Income 0.4485 0.1137 3.9545 0.0003 Size 4.2615 0.8062 5.286 0.0001 School -0.6517 0.4319 -1.509 0.1383 -Referring to Scenario 17-1, which of the following values for the level of significance is the smallest for which every explanatory variable is significant individually?

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(79)
Showing 301 - 320 of 386
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)