Exam 5: Consolidated Financial Statements - Intercompany Asset Transactions

Webb Co. acquired 100% of Rand Inc. on January 5, 2011. During 2011, Webb sold goods to Rand for $2,400,000 that cost Webb $1,800,000. Rand still owned 40% of the goods at the end of the year. Cost of goods sold was $10,800,000 for Webb and $6,400,000 for Rand. What was consolidated cost of goods sold?

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2010. In the consolidation worksheet for 2010, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate the intra-entity transfer of inventory?

Pepe, Incorporated acquired 60% of Devin Company on January 1, 2010. On that date Devin sold equipment to Pepe for $45,000. The equipment had a cost of $120,000 and accumulated depreciation of $66,000 with a remaining life of 9 years. Devin reported net income of $300,000 and $325,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. Pepe uses the equity method to account for its investment in Devin. What is the gain or loss on equipment reported by Devin for 2010?

Edgar Co. acquired 60% of Stendall Co. on January 1, 2011. During 2011, Edgar made several sales of inventory to Stendall. The cost and selling price of the goods were $140,000 and $200,000, respectively. Stendall still owned one-fourth of the goods at the end of 2011. Consolidated cost of goods sold for 2011 was $2,140,000 because of a consolidating adjustment for intra-entity sales less the entire profit remaining in Stendall's ending inventory. How would non-controlling interest in net income have differed if the transfers had been for the same amount and cost, but from Stendall to Edgar?

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2010. Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. Compute the equity in earnings of Gargiulo reported on Posito's books for 2011.

Which of the following statements is true concerning an intra-entity transfer of a depreciable asset?

When is the gain on an intra-entity transfer of land realized?

On January 1, 2011, Payton Co. sold equipment to its subsidiary, Starker Corp., for $115,000. The equipment had cost $125,000, and the balance in accumulated depreciation was $45,000. The equipment had an estimated remaining useful life of eight years and $0 salvage value. Both companies use straight-line depreciation. On their separate 2011 income statements, Payton and Starker reported depreciation expense of $84,000 and $60,000, respectively. The amount of depreciation expense on the consolidated income statement for 2011 would have been

Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2010. On January 1, 2010, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2010 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends: Compute Wilson's share of income from Simon for consolidation for 2012.

Throughout 2011, Cleveland Co. sold inventory to Leeward Co., its subsidiary. From a consolidated point of view, when will the gain on this transfer be earned?

Which of the following statements is true regarding inventory transfers between a parent and its subsidiary, using the initial value method?

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2010. Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. Compute the non-controlling interest in Gargiulo's net income for 2011.

How is the gain on an intra-entity transfer of a depreciable asset realized?

Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2010. On January 1, 2010, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2010 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends: Compute Wilson's share of income from Simon for consolidation for 2010.

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2010. Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. For consolidation purposes, what amount would be debited to cost of goods sold for the 2011 consolidation worksheet with regard to the unrealized gross profit of the 2011 intra-entity transfer of merchandise?

Norek Corp. owned 70% of the voting common stock of Thelma Co. On January 2, 2010, Thelma sold a parcel of land to Norek. The land had a book value of $32,000 and was sold to Norek for $45,000. Thelma's reported net income for 2010 was $119,000. What is the non-controlling interest's share of Thelma's net income?

Yukon Co. acquired 75% percent of the voting common stock of Ontario Corp. on January 1, 2011. During the year, Yukon made sales of inventory to Ontario. The inventory cost Yukon $260,000 and was sold to Ontario for $390,000. Ontario still had $60,000 of the goods in its inventory at the end of the year. The amount of unrealized intra-entity profit that should be eliminated in the consolidation process at the end of 2011 is

Pot Co. holds 90% of the common stock of Skillet Co. During 2011, Pot reported sales of $1,120,000 and cost of goods sold of $840,000. For this same period, Skillet had sales of $420,000 and cost of goods sold of $252,000. Included in the amounts for Pot's sales were Pot's sales of merchandise to Skillet for $140,000. There were no sales from Skillet to Pot. Intra-entity sales had the same markup as sales to outsiders. Skillet still had 40% of the intra-entity sales as inventory at the end of 2011. What are consolidated sales and cost of goods sold for 2011?

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2010. In the consolidation worksheet for 2011, assuming Carter uses the initial value method of accounting for its investment in Strickland, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2010 intra-entity sales?

An intra-entity sale took place whereby the transfer price exceeded the book value of a depreciable asset. Which statement is true for the year following the sale?