Exam 5: Consolidated Financial Statements - Intercompany Asset Transactions

X-Beams Inc. owned 70% of the voting common stock of Kent Corp. During 2011, Kent made several sales of inventory to X-Beams. The total selling price was $180,000 and the cost was $100,000. At the end of the year, 20% of the goods were still in X-Beams' inventory. Kent's reported net income was $300,000. What was the non-controlling interest in Kent's net income?

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2010. In the consolidation worksheet for 2010, which of the following choices would be a debit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2010 intra-entity sales?

Bauerly Co. owned 70% of the voting common stock of Devin Co. During 2010, Devin made frequent sales of inventory to Bauerly. There were unrealized gains of $40,000 in the beginning inventory and $25,000 of unrealized gains at the end of the year. Devin reported net income of $137,000 for 2010. Bauerly decided to use the equity method to account for the investment. What is the non-controlling interest's share of Devin's net income for 2010?

On January 1, 2011, Race Corp. acquired 80% of the voting common stock of Gallow Inc. During the year, Race sold to Gallow for $450,000 goods which cost $330,000. Gallow still owned 15% of the goods at year-end. Gallow's reported net income was $204,000, and Race's net income was $806,000. Race decided to use the equity method to account for this investment. What was the non-controlling interest's share of consolidated net income?

Clemente Co. owned all of the voting common stock of Snider Co. On January 2, 2010, Clemente sold equipment to Snider for $125,000. The equipment had cost Clemente $140,000. At the time of the sale, the balance in accumulated depreciation was $40,000. The equipment had a remaining useful life of five years and a $0 salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used by both Clemente and Snider. At what amount should the equipment (net of depreciation) be included in the consolidated balance sheet dated December 31, 2010?

Clemente Co. owned all of the voting common stock of Snider Co. On January 2, 2010, Clemente sold equipment to Snider for $125,000. The equipment had cost Clemente $140,000. At the time of the sale, the balance in accumulated depreciation was $40,000. The equipment had a remaining useful life of five years and a $0 salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used by both Clemente and Snider. At what amount should the equipment (net of depreciation) be included in the consolidated balance sheet dated December 31, 2011?

On January 1, 2010, Smeder Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Collins, Inc., transferred equipment with a 10-year life (six of which remain with no salvage value) to Collins in exchange for $84,000 cash. At the date of transfer, Smeder's records carried the equipment at a cost of $120,000 less accumulated depreciation of $48,000. Straight-line depreciation is used. Smeder reported net income of $28,000 and $32,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. All net income effects of the intra-entity transfer are attributed to the seller for consolidation purposes. Compute the gain recognized by Smeder Company relating to the equipment for 2010.

Several years ago Polar Inc. acquired an 80% interest in Icecap Co. The book values of Icecap's asset and liability accounts at that time were considered to be equal to their fair values. Polar's acquisition value corresponded to the underlying book value of Icecap so that no allocations or goodwill resulted from the transaction. The following selected account balances were from the individual financial records of these two companies as of December 31, 2011: Assume that Icecap sold inventory to Polar at a markup equal to 25% of cost. Intra-entity transfers were $70,000 in 2010 and $112,000 in 2011. Of this inventory, $29,000 of the 2010 transfers were retained and then sold by Polar in 2011, whereas $49,000 of the 2011 transfers were held until 2012. Required: For the consolidated financial statements for 2011, determine the balances that would appear for the following accounts: (1) Cost of Goods Sold, (2) Inventory, and (3) Non-controlling Interest in Subsidiary's Net Income.

An intra-entity sale took place whereby the book value exceeded the transfer price of a depreciable asset. Which statement is true for the year following the sale?

Fraker, Inc. owns 90 percent of Richards, Inc. and bought $200,000 of Richards' inventory in 2011. The transfer price was equal to 30 percent of the sales price. When preparing consolidated financial statements, what amount of these sales is eliminated?

Pepe, Incorporated acquired 60% of Devin Company on January 1, 2010. On that date Devin sold equipment to Pepe for $45,000. The equipment had a cost of $120,000 and accumulated depreciation of $66,000 with a remaining life of 9 years. Devin reported net income of $300,000 and $325,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. Pepe uses the equity method to account for its investment in Devin. What is the consolidated gain or loss on equipment for 2010?

Walsh Company sells inventory to its subsidiary, Fisher Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Walsh uses the equity method to account for its investment in Fisher. In the consolidation worksheet for 2010, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate the intra-entity transfer of inventory?

Virginia Corp. owned all of the voting common stock of Stateside Co. Both companies use the perpetual inventory method, and Virginia decided to use the partial equity method to account for this investment. During 2010, Virginia made cash sales of $400,000 to Stateside. The gross profit rate was 30% of the selling price. By the end of 2010, Stateside had sold 75% of the goods to outside parties for $420,000 cash. Prepare any 2011 consolidation worksheet entries that would be required regarding the 2010 inventory transfer.

Gibson Corp. owned a 90% interest in Sparis Co. Sparis frequently made sales of inventory to Gibson. The sales, which include a markup over cost of 25%, were $420,000 in 2010 and $500,000 in 2011. At the end of each year, Gibson still owned 30% of the goods. Net income for Sparis was $912,000 during 2011. What was the non-controlling interest's share of Sparis' net income for 2011?

An intra-entity sale took place whereby the transfer price was less than the book value of a depreciable asset. Which statement is true for the year following the sale?

On January 1, 2011, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired. As of December 31, 2011, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows: During 2011, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31. What is the total of consolidated revenues?

Pepe, Incorporated acquired 60% of Devin Company on January 1, 2010. On that date Devin sold equipment to Pepe for $45,000. The equipment had a cost of $120,000 and accumulated depreciation of $66,000 with a remaining life of 9 years. Devin reported net income of $300,000 and $325,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. Pepe uses the equity method to account for its investment in Devin. Compute the income from Devin reported on Pepe's books for 2011.

Prince Corp. owned 80% of Kile Corp.'s common stock. During October 2011, Kile sold merchandise to Prince for $140,000. At December 31, 2011, 50% of this merchandise remained in Prince's inventory. For 2011, gross profit percentages were 30% of sales for Prince and 40% of sales for Kile. The amount of unrealized intra-entity profit in ending inventory at December 31, 2011 that should be eliminated in the consolidation process is

Gentry Inc. acquired 100% of Gaspard Farms on January 5, 2010. During 2010, Gentry sold Gaspard Farms for $625,000 goods which had cost $425,000. Gaspard Farms still owned 12% of the goods at the end of the year. In 2011, Gentry sold goods with a cost of $800,000 to Gaspard Farms for $1,000,000, and Gaspard Farms still owned 10% of the goods at year-end. For 2011, cost of goods sold was $5,400,000 for Gentry and $1,200,000 for Gaspard Farms. What was consolidated cost of goods sold for 2011?

What is the purpose of the adjustments to depreciation expense within the consolidation process when there has been an intra-entity transfer of a depreciable asset?