Exam 12: Crisis Communication and Reputation Management in Sports
Why are perceived violations of stakeholder expectations an important part of the definition of crisis?
Perceived violations of stakeholder expectations are an important part of the definition of crisis because they are at the core of what transforms a mere incident or challenge into a crisis situation. Stakeholders include any individuals or groups that have an interest in the performance and actions of an organization, such as customers, employees, shareholders, suppliers, regulators, and the community at large.
Here are several reasons why these perceived violations are critical in defining a crisis:
1. **Trust and Reputation**: Stakeholders have certain expectations regarding how an organization should behave, its performance, and its adherence to ethical, legal, and social standards. When these expectations are not met, it can lead to a loss of trust and damage to the organization's reputation, which can have long-lasting effects.
2. **Legitimacy**: Organizations operate with a social license granted by their stakeholders. When an organization violates the expectations of its stakeholders, it risks losing its legitimacy, which can threaten its very existence.
3. **Impact on Relationships**: Strong relationships with stakeholders are built on meeting or exceeding expectations. A crisis often indicates a breakdown in these relationships, which can have severe consequences for an organization's ability to operate effectively.
4. **Response and Recovery**: The perception of a violation dictates the urgency and nature of the response required by the organization. A crisis demands immediate attention and resources to manage and mitigate the situation, and the organization's future may depend on how well it responds to stakeholder concerns.
5. **Financial Consequences**: Violating stakeholder expectations can lead to direct financial losses through decreased sales, legal liabilities, or regulatory fines. It can also affect the organization indirectly through increased costs for crisis management and public relations efforts to rebuild stakeholder confidence.
6. **Escalation of the Situation**: When stakeholders perceive that their expectations have been violated, they may take action that can escalate the situation, such as protests, boycotts, or calling for regulatory intervention, which can further deepen the crisis.
7. **Media Amplification**: In today's connected world, news of perceived violations can spread rapidly through traditional and social media, amplifying the crisis and increasing the pressure on the organization to address the situation effectively.
In summary, perceived violations of stakeholder expectations are central to the definition of a crisis because they signal a significant disruption in the relationship between an organization and those it serves or depends upon. These violations can lead to a loss of trust, legitimacy, and financial stability, and they require an immediate and strategic response to prevent further damage and to begin the process of recovery.
Any form of crisis communication will make the situation better.
False
In situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) what is the ethical base response and when should it be used in a crisis?
The ethical base response in situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) is to prioritize transparency, honesty, and accountability in communication during a crisis. This means being open and forthcoming about the situation, taking responsibility for any mistakes or shortcomings, and actively working to address the crisis and its impact on stakeholders.
This ethical base response should be used in a crisis when there is a need to rebuild trust and credibility with stakeholders. By being transparent and honest, an organization can demonstrate its commitment to addressing the crisis and its impact, which can help to mitigate reputational damage and rebuild relationships with stakeholders. Additionally, this approach can help to prevent further escalation of the crisis and minimize potential legal or regulatory consequences.
Overall, the ethical base response in SCCT should be used in a crisis to prioritize ethical communication practices that prioritize the well-being and trust of stakeholders, while also working to address the crisis and its impact in a responsible and accountable manner.
Organizations have nothing to learn from a failure crisis communication effort.
How did the Ray Rice case illustrate the levels of crisis unique to the sport context?
The negative outcomes from a crisis refer to the effects of the crisis on __________.
In the FIFA crisis example, the _____________ were the reason for change.
Athlete reputational crises involve the two dimensions of _______________ and ____________.
When unverified and negative information is circulating about an athlete, that is an example of the _________ paracrisis.
Why is the exact composition of the crisis team variable-can be different from crisis to crisis?
When might a memorial be part of the post-crisis communication?
Suboptimal response are less effect than optimal responses because they __________.
Crisis communication can be invaluable during a crisis because it can ______________.
How does a paracrisis differ from a crisis? Why does that difference matter to crisis managers?
Crisis managers have the option to ignore a paracrisis and that might be an effective response.
Why is social media identified as factor that affects the sport context for crisis communication?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)