Exam 21: Drugs
Exam 1: Moral Theory21 Questions
Exam 2: Moral Reasoning32 Questions
Exam 3: Skepticism About Morality44 Questions
Exam 4: The Good Life38 Questions
Exam 5: Consequentialism31 Questions
Exam 6: Kantian Ethics27 Questions
Exam 7: Social Contract Theory22 Questions
Exam 8: Natural Law25 Questions
Exam 9: The Ethic of Prima Facie Duties23 Questions
Exam 10: Virtue Ethics23 Questions
Exam 11: Feminist Ethics and the Ethics of Care23 Questions
Exam 12: Abortion93 Questions
Exam 13: Animals101 Questions
Exam 14: The Environment88 Questions
Exam 15: Euthanasia77 Questions
Exam 16: Economic Justice and Economic Inequality92 Questions
Exam 17: Globalization and Immigration105 Questions
Exam 18: The Legacy of Racism102 Questions
Exam 19: Privacy88 Questions
Exam 20: The Death Penalty96 Questions
Exam 21: Drugs73 Questions
Exam 22: Genetic Engineering88 Questions
Exam 23: Sexual Morality100 Questions
Select questions type
Which of the following is a premise in the Harm to Others Argument?
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(82)
De Marneffe argues that laws against the manufacture and sale of alcohol and cigarettes
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(71)
According to Goodin, which of the following is Rose Cipollone's preferred preference?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(87)
The kind of paternalism Goodin endorses is restricted to forcing people to realize
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(82)
If drug use is immoral, does that mean it should also be illegal? Can you identify a standard for determining when an immoral action should also be criminalized? Illustrate this standard with one or two examples involving drug use and/or manufacture and distribution.
(Essay)
4.8/5
(90)
Under what conditions does Huemer think that the government should prohibit people from doing things that harm themselves?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(78)
What support is there for the claim that laws criminalizing drug manufacture and distribution greatly reduce social harm and do not violate anyone's rights?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(77)
De Marneffe thinks that a law _______ would violate people's rights.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(82)
Case Study
Sarah is a 23-year-old woman. Her parents died when she was in college and left her a multi-million-dollar inheritance. She does not have children, a romantic partner, or any pets. She is in good health, has a college degree, and has shown herself to be a capable and intelligent person. Instead of pursuing one of the many career paths open to her, Sarah has decided to devote her life full-time to the enjoyment of heroin and other opioids. She abandons the other hobbies and activities she once enjoyed, but she does not miss them. If you asked her, she would tell you she is happy with her life.
Sarah can easily afford her new way of life. She has no close friends or family members, so no one is left devastated in the wake of her addiction. She recognizes that her new way of life is incredibly risky, but she accepts the possibility that she may overdose or inadvertently acquire a bad batch of heroin as a risk worth taking. In her estimation, the immense pleasure that she receives from taking heroin and other opioids is worth the risk, as well as the opportunity cost.
-Is Sarah living a morally acceptable life? Is she living a good life? Is Sarah is harming herself through her drug use?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(73)
Which of the following best characterizes de Marneffe's primary reason for thinking that drugs should not be legalized?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(98)
Why do you think that Huemer claims that dangerous driving "is clearly the business of the state?" What would Huemer say is the morally relevant difference between dangerous driving and drug use? What do you think the morally relevant difference is? Can Huemer successfully maintain his view that dangerous driving should be illegal while drugs should not be? Defend your response.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(88)
Which of the following does de Marneffe identify as a relevant difference between alcohol and other drugs?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(66)
Which of the following is a premise in the Rights Argument?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(90)
One argument for the legalization of drugs relies on the claim that if the use of _______ and _______ should be legal, then recreational use of other drugs should be legal.
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(70)
Showing 41 - 60 of 73
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)