Exam 16: Economic Justice and Economic Inequality

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

Explain in your own words what the Rawlsian original position is and what it is supposed to show us. In your explanation, be sure to defend the maximin principle and the difference principle. Is Rawls right in the conclusions he draws from this thought experiment? Defend your answer.

Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(78)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The Rawlsian original position is a hypothetical scenario in which individuals are placed behind a "veil of ignorance," meaning they are unaware of their own personal characteristics, such as their social status, wealth, or talents. In this position, individuals are tasked with creating principles for a just society without knowing how these principles will affect them personally. The purpose of the original position is to demonstrate what principles of justice individuals would agree to under fair and equal conditions.

The maximin principle, which is favored by Rawls, states that individuals should choose the option that maximizes the minimum level of well-being for everyone. This principle prioritizes the welfare of the least advantaged members of society, ensuring that no one is left behind. The difference principle, also proposed by Rawls, argues that social and economic inequalities should be arranged so that they benefit the least advantaged members of society. This principle allows for inequalities as long as they work to the advantage of the least well-off.

Rawls believes that the conclusions drawn from the original position support the maximin principle and the difference principle as the most just and fair principles for society. He argues that individuals in the original position would choose these principles because they prioritize the well-being of the least advantaged members of society, ensuring a fair distribution of resources and opportunities.

In my opinion, Rawls is right in the conclusions he draws from this thought experiment. The original position effectively demonstrates the importance of prioritizing the well-being of the least advantaged members of society, as it ensures a fair and just distribution of resources and opportunities. The maximin principle and the difference principle provide a framework for creating a more equitable society, and the original position helps to justify their importance in achieving justice. Therefore, I believe Rawls' conclusions are valid and defendable based on the principles of fairness and equality.

Which view is described by the following quote? "Let prices move according to the free market. But set up a government agency to compensate people for their undeserved bad luck, from taxes raised on that part of people's property that they receive on account of their undeserved good luck."

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(86)
Correct Answer:
Verified

B

Which of these complaints about taxation does Anderson not object to in this reading?

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(75)
Correct Answer:
Verified

D

One of Rawls's principles of justice

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(71)

Explain the Needs Argument. Is this argument sound? Do you agree that needs do not entail rights? Why or why not? Illustrate your position with reference to specific examples.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(67)

On Anderson's interpretation, Locke would

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(77)

Which of the following is a premise in the Liberty Argument?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(75)

Cohen thinks that several moral problems are contingently associated with inequality. What are these problems? Are these the only moral problems with inequality in your view? Defend your answer.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(87)

Freedom from interference is known as

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(85)

Present and defend the Insufficiency Argument. One criticism of the Insufficiency Argument is that it is too difficult to determine what counts as a good life. Do you agree that this is an insurmountable difficulty? Why or why not?

(Essay)
5.0/5
(82)

According to Scanlon, equality of opportunity is _______ for the justice of unequal outcomes.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(79)

Which of the following is a line of reasoning that opposes economic egalitarianism?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(82)

Recall that a consequence of the Effort Argument is that most CEOs should earn no more than most schoolteachers. Do you think this consequence of the argument is true? In defending your answer, explain and motivate the premises of the Effort Argument and identify what you take to be the strongest objection to this argument.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(83)

Cohen claims that inequality is not, in itself, morally problematic. How does Cohen argue for this claim? Is his argument convincing? Why or why not?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(83)

The view that needs do not entail rights gives rise to which of the following arguments?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(73)

Talk about: -Net worth

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(67)

Scanlon subscribes to the difference principle but does not arrive at it by way of Rawls's argument. Compare Scanlon and Rawls's respective arguments for the difference principle. Is either argument more compelling in your view? If so, which one and why?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(87)

Which of the following is an objection to the Rawlsian Argument for the Difference Principle?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(89)

Which of the following is true of the veil of ignorance, according to Rawls?

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(73)

Which of the following institutional mechanisms generate inequality according to Scanlon?

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(87)
Showing 1 - 20 of 92
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)