Exam 18: The Legacy of Racism
Exam 1: Moral Theory21 Questions
Exam 2: Moral Reasoning32 Questions
Exam 3: Skepticism About Morality44 Questions
Exam 4: The Good Life38 Questions
Exam 5: Consequentialism31 Questions
Exam 6: Kantian Ethics27 Questions
Exam 7: Social Contract Theory22 Questions
Exam 8: Natural Law25 Questions
Exam 9: The Ethic of Prima Facie Duties23 Questions
Exam 10: Virtue Ethics23 Questions
Exam 11: Feminist Ethics and the Ethics of Care23 Questions
Exam 12: Abortion93 Questions
Exam 13: Animals101 Questions
Exam 14: The Environment88 Questions
Exam 15: Euthanasia77 Questions
Exam 16: Economic Justice and Economic Inequality92 Questions
Exam 17: Globalization and Immigration105 Questions
Exam 18: The Legacy of Racism102 Questions
Exam 19: Privacy88 Questions
Exam 20: The Death Penalty96 Questions
Exam 21: Drugs73 Questions
Exam 22: Genetic Engineering88 Questions
Exam 23: Sexual Morality100 Questions
Select questions type
According to Alexander, what was the motive behind the War on Drugs?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(85)
According to King, the white moderate is more devoted to _______ than _______.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(87)
According to Anderson, conservative opposition to integration rests on the idea that
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(89)
According to Hausman, which of the following is capable of justifying preferential hiring and admissions?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(70)
According to Anderson, Americans have largely attained which stage(s) of integration?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(70)
Case Study
A graduate program at an elite research university has been criticized for admitting predominantly white students. The chair of the admissions committee takes these criticisms to heart. She believes that there are several reasons to admit a class with greater racial diversity. First, she believes it is important to use her position of privilege and power to do what she can to correct for past injustices that have held back people of color. She also believes that it is better for the graduate program to have more perspectives represented, and so there is a great value in admitting students from a wider variety of backgrounds.
With this goal of making the program more diverse and inclusive in mind, she introduces a new policy for evaluating applicants. She is wary of implicit bias affecting the way faculty rank applicants. So, instead of asking the faculty on the committee to rank applicants according to the strength of their dossiers, she separates the applications into two groups. The first group contains white applicants and the second group contains applicants who are people of color. She asks the faculty on the committee to rank the applicants in both piles and then admits the top five students from each pile.
-Part of the admissions chair's motivation is to enact reparative justice. Is this form of reparative justice appropriate? Is it an adequate way of responding to the fact that past injustices continue to unfairly advantage members of some groups?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(87)
Which is true of defenders of the Equal Opportunity Argument?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(66)
Which of the following is a premise in the Reparations Argument?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(76)
According to Alexander, the US criminal justice functions more like a _______ than a system of crime control.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(91)
Case Study
A graduate program at an elite research university has been criticized for admitting predominantly white students. The chair of the admissions committee takes these criticisms to heart. She believes that there are several reasons to admit a class with greater racial diversity. First, she believes it is important to use her position of privilege and power to do what she can to correct for past injustices that have held back people of color. She also believes that it is better for the graduate program to have more perspectives represented, and so there is a great value in admitting students from a wider variety of backgrounds.
With this goal of making the program more diverse and inclusive in mind, she introduces a new policy for evaluating applicants. She is wary of implicit bias affecting the way faculty rank applicants. So, instead of asking the faculty on the committee to rank applicants according to the strength of their dossiers, she separates the applications into two groups. The first group contains white applicants and the second group contains applicants who are people of color. She asks the faculty on the committee to rank the applicants in both piles and then admits the top five students from each pile.
-Is this affirmative action policy morally good? Is there anything morally bad about it? Is there anything else this chair should be doing to counteract the white privilege of some applicants?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(79)
According to King, what must be the case in order for direct action to be morally acceptable?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(69)
The racism in reverse argument claims that "race is almost always not a qualification." Hausman thinks that this claim is debatable because
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(87)
Showing 41 - 60 of 102
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)