Exam 6: Identity
What does Hume take the self to be? Why does he think this?
Hume takes the self to be a bundle of perceptions and experiences rather than a unified, enduring entity. He argues that when we introspect, we only find a series of fleeting impressions and ideas, and there is no underlying substance or self that remains constant throughout our experiences. Hume thinks this because he believes that our sense of self is constructed from our perceptions and experiences, and there is no evidence for a permanent, unchanging self that exists independently of these perceptions. He also argues that our sense of self is constantly changing and evolving, and there is no fixed, unchanging self to be found. Therefore, Hume concludes that the self is nothing more than a collection of perceptions and experiences, and there is no substantial, enduring self to be found within our consciousness.
A person is an immaterial substance according to Locke.
False
According to Reid, identity in its proper sense can be applied to
D
Explain what Parfit means by the bodily criterion. Is this a good way to determine personal identity? Why or why not?
What role does memory play in Reid's account of personal identity? How is it different from the role it plays in Locke's account?
Is it possible that neither you nor Peter survived the brain transplant? Explain.
In Parfit's single case, what does he conclude about the new person created?
What is Parfit's conclusion about the head transplant example?
Perry claims that we normally equate personal identity with bodily identity.
In Parfit's double case, what does he conclude about the new people created?
Do we normally assume that personal identity is bodily identity? Explain.
What is the major problem with Locke's view identified by Reid? Is it a persuasive refutation of Locke's view? Explain.
According to the brain-based psychological criterion, a future person is me if that person has
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)