Exam 7: Policing: Legal Aspects

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Define electronic evidence and discuss the issues relative to the gathering of electronic evidence.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(80)

An officer knocks on the door of a suspected drug dealer,who invites the officer into the house.While in the kitchen,the officer notices a marijuana plant on the windowsill.The officer may legally seize the plant under the ________ doctrine.

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(81)

The current test for determining probable cause based on informant information is the two-pronged test.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(57)

Explain the findings and importance of Weeks v U.S.and Mapp v.Ohio.What is the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine and what limits does it place on the police?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(95)

Match the Supreme Court case to its main ruling. A)U.S.v.Leon B)Weeks v.U.S. C)Mapp v.U.S. D)Escobedo v.Illinois E)Chimel v.California F)Terry v.Ohio G)Silverthorne Lumber Co.v.U.S. H)Harris v.U.S. -Set forth the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(70)

Which of the following is not one of the three areas of due process requirements that are of relevance to the police?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(95)

A suspect can only make a "knowing waiver" of his rights if he is able understand the consequences of not invoking the Miranda rights.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(73)

According to the Supreme Court,during the execution of a valid search warrant,the authority of the police to detain the occupants of the dwelling is

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(75)

The police may not search a person unless that person is suspected of a crime.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(97)

The ________ exception to the exclusionary rule permits the use of evidence illegally seized by the police if the officers believed they were operating legally.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(85)

The Warren Court used the Fourteenth Amendment to require both state and federal criminal justice agencies to adhere to the Court's interpretation of the Constitution.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(91)

In Escobedo v.Illinois,the Supreme Court formally recognized a suspect's right to have an attorney present

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(84)

Mapp v.Ohio was a landmark case that restricted police from interrogating juveniles without their parents present.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(76)

Match the Constitutional right with the amendment that guarantees it. A)Fourth B)Fourteenth C)Fifth D)Sixth E)Eighth -Right against excessive fines

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(67)
Showing 101 - 114 of 114
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)