Chat with AIExam 1: B: Psychology and Scientific Thinking
Identify and describe the three crucial warning signs that a claim may be pseudoscientific.
(77) 
VerifiedAnswers will vary but should contain the points that reflect the following information for full credit.
--Overuse of ad hoc immunizing hypotheses.An ad hoc immunizing hypothesis is just an escape hatch that defenders of a theory use to protect their theory from being falsified.When proponents of a theory come across negative evidence,they often try to explain it away by invoking loopholes.Sometimes these loopholes are justified,but in other cases they amount to nothing more than excuses for negative findings.
--Lack of self-correction.As we've learned,many scientific claims turn out to be wrong.In science,incorrect claims tend to be weeded out eventually,even though it often takes a while.In contrast,in pseudoscience,incorrect claims never seem to go away because their proponents cling to them stubbornly despite contrary evidence.
--Overreliance on anecdotes.There's an old saying that "the plural of anecdote is not data." A mountain of numerous anecdotes may seem impressive,but it shouldn't persuade us to put much stock in others' claims.Anecdotes are I know a person who assertions.This kind of secondhand evidence-"I know a person who says his self-esteem skyrocketed after receiving hypnosis";"I know a person who tried to commit suicide after taking an antidepressant"-is commonplace in everyday life.
Describe the dangers of pseudoscience and why the dangers should matter to you.
(83) VerifiedAnswers will vary but at least three of the following are needed for full credit.
--People use valuable resources (primarily money),time,and energy on pseudoscientific treatments that either don't work or have no research on their effectiveness as treatments.Meanwhile,they are missing out on scientifically documented,effective treatments that could relieve their suffering.
--These decisions lead to impacts on the diversity of animal species throughout the world.
--Persons may be directly harmed when opinion rather than scientific proof is used in the application of a treatment.
--Pseudoscience impacts people in their daily lives;it impacts the education their children may get,it impacts the workplace,and it impacts their community through politics and other means.
Apply the critical thinking principles discussed in Chapter 1 to a discussion of how science is an approach to evidence.
(75) VerifiedAnswers may vary but a full credit answer will contain the following points.
--Needs to discuss the idea humility (need to recognize that our hypothesis or theory is wrong)
--We are required to ask questions in a manner that allows them to be shown to be supported or refuted (falsifiability).
--Critical thinking principles provide the tools to choose between theories: parsimony,kind of evidence necessary to modify what is currently known (extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence),replicability is needed to help ensure the accuracy of initial findings,and questions should be structured so that rival explanations are eliminated via research.
--Must understand that demonstrating a relationship (correlation)isn't the same as demonstrating causation
What does the concept of falsifiability refer to? Explain what it means for a theory to be falsifiable,the implications of the falsifiability principle,and what characteristics make a good theory.
(74) Evaluate critically the kind of information that one gains from common sense.
(97) The textbook authors noted that many people misunderstand the role of a theory in science.Analyze how these misunderstandings are related to low levels of scientific literacy.
(76) What are the three main logical fallacies in psychological thinking that can predispose us to pseudoscientific beliefs? Describe and provide an example of each.
(72) Analyze how the warning signs of pseudoscience are often examples of violations of the principles of critical thinking.
(72) 
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)