Exam 1: Introduction: The Study of Politics
Contrast the normative and behavioralist approaches to the study of political science. How do they differ? In what ways might they complement one another?
The normative approach to the study of political science focuses on how things should be in politics. It is concerned with ethical and moral principles, and seeks to understand and prescribe the ideal political system and behavior. This approach often involves evaluating political institutions and processes against a set of normative standards, such as justice, equality, and democracy.
On the other hand, the behavioralist approach to the study of political science is more concerned with how things actually are in politics. It emphasizes the scientific study of political behavior, using empirical data and methods to understand and predict political phenomena. This approach often involves analyzing the behavior of individuals and groups within the political system, and seeks to uncover patterns and regularities in political processes.
The normative and behavioralist approaches differ in their focus and methodology. While the normative approach is more concerned with values and ideals, the behavioralist approach is more concerned with observable behavior and empirical evidence. However, these approaches can also complement one another in several ways.
First, the normative approach can provide a framework for evaluating and critiquing the findings of the behavioralist approach. By establishing normative standards for political behavior and institutions, the normative approach can help to assess whether the findings of the behavioralist approach are desirable or problematic from a moral or ethical perspective.
Second, the behavioralist approach can provide empirical evidence and insights that can inform and enrich the normative approach. By studying actual political behavior and processes, the behavioralist approach can provide valuable data and analysis that can help to ground and refine the normative principles and ideals of the normative approach.
In this way, the normative and behavioralist approaches to the study of political science can work together to provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of politics. While they may differ in their focus and methods, they can complement one another by offering different perspectives and insights that can enrich our understanding of political phenomena.
Behaviorism is an offshoot of positivism that focuses mainly on the study of political behavior.
True
Which subfield would involve a political scientist who would specialize in how a bureaucracy implements governmental policies?
E
Normativism is normally associated with which political philosopher?
Political scientists who study similarities and differences in legislative processes across countries would be working in which subfield?
Imagine a country composed of two ethnic groups, one of which constitutes the majority of the population and the other a significant minority. Each ethnic group considers itself to be a "nation." How might the government go about creating a sense of political unity and common purpose in its citizenry? In an attempt to foster a common identity, might some government strategies actually increase the gulf between the two nations? How?
What term is best used to describe the role of reason over emotion in human behavior?
According to a recent issue of The Economist, what is the strongest force shaping politics today?
Basic to the notion of social contract theory is the notion that the right to rule is based on the consent of the governed.
A specialist in international relations would likely NOT focus on
The political theory of the social contract is often associated with which of the following philosophers?
Arbitrary national borders that challenge the traditional idea of the nation-state emerged after
The Peace of Westphalia at the end of the Thirty Years' War created the foundation for the modern nation-state system.
Behavioral political scientists place little emphasis on abstract or normative political questions.
What kind of effect did the Peace of Westphalia have on the study of politics?
Although political science has a variety of subfields, all of them use the same methodology.
Which of the following best describes a people who are scattered over the territory of several states or dispersed widely and who have no autonomous, independent, or sovereign governing body of their own?
Discuss Irving Kristol's explanation of why some Germans participated in Nazi crimes against humanity. Use Adolf Eichmann as an example. Can this theory be applied to any current-day moral actions/dilemmas? Explain.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)