Exam 87: Don Marquis: Why Abortion Is Immoral
Exam 1: Plato: Socratic Wisdom10 Questions
Exam 2: Plato: The Allegory of the Cave15 Questions
Exam 3: John Locke: of Enthusiasm and the Quest for Truth15 Questions
Exam 4: Bertrand Russell: The Value of Philosophy15 Questions
Exam 5: Thomas Aquinas: The Five Ways12 Questions
Exam 6: William Lane Craig: The Kalam Cosmological Argument and the Anthropic Principle9 Questions
Exam 7: Paul Edwards: A Critique of the Cosmological Argument15 Questions
Exam 8: William Paley: The Watch and the Watchmaker9 Questions
Exam 9: David Hume: A Critique of the Teleological Argument14 Questions
Exam 10: ST Anselm and Gaunilo: The Ontological Argument13 Questions
Exam 11: William Rowe: an Analysis of the Ontological Argument11 Questions
Exam 12: Fyodor Dostoevsky: Why Is There Evil15 Questions
Exam 13: B.C.Johnson: Why Doesnt God Intervene to Prevent Evil15 Questions
Exam 14: John Hick: There Is a Reason Why God Allows Evil8 Questions
Exam 15: William L Rowe: the Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism12 Questions
Exam 16: Blaise Pascal: Yes, Faith Is a Logical Bet10 Questions
Exam 17: Wk Clifford: The Ethics of Belief15 Questions
Exam 18: William James: The Will to Believe10 Questions
Exam 19: Alvin Plantinga: Religious Belief Without Evidence15 Questions
Exam 20: Michael Martin: Faith and Foundationalism15 Questions
Exam 21: Søren Kierkegaard: Faith and Truth15 Questions
Exam 22: Bertrand Russell: Can Religion Cure Our Troubles15 Questions
Exam 23: René Descartes: Cartesian Doubt and the Search for Foundational Knowledge4 Questions
Exam 24: John Locke: The Empiricist Theory of Knowledge8 Questions
Exam 25: George Berkeley: an Idealist Theory of Knowledge11 Questions
Exam 26: David Hume: The Origin of Our Ideas5 Questions
Exam 27: G E Moore: Proof of an External World15 Questions
Exam 28: Bertrand Russell: The Correspondence Theory of Truth15 Questions
Exam 29: William James: The Pragmatic Theory of Truth15 Questions
Exam 30: Richard Rorty: Dismantling Truth: Solidarity Versus Objectivity15 Questions
Exam 31: Daniel Dennett: Postmodernism and Truth15 Questions
Exam 32: Eve Browning Cole: Philosophy and Feminist Criticism15 Questions
Exam 33: Alison Ainley: Feminist Philosophy14 Questions
Exam 34: David Hume: Skeptical Doubts Concerning the Operations of the Understanding6 Questions
Exam 35: Wesley C Salmon: The Problem of Induction15 Questions
Exam 36: René Descartes: Substance Dualism8 Questions
Exam 37: Gilbert Ryle: Exorcising Descartess Ghost in the Machine15 Questions
Exam 38: J.P.Moreland: A Contemporary Defense of Dualism15 Questions
Exam 39: Paul Churchland: on Functionalism and Materialism15 Questions
Exam 40: JJC Smart: Sensations and Brain Processes12 Questions
Exam 41: Thomas Nagel: What Is It Like to Be a Bat12 Questions
Exam 42: Jerry a Fodor: The Mindbody Problem10 Questions
Exam 43: David Chalmers: Property Dualism13 Questions
Exam 44: John Searle: Minds, Brains, and Computers11 Questions
Exam 45: Ned Block: Troubles With Functionalism9 Questions
Exam 46: John Locke: Our Psychological Properties Define the Self15 Questions
Exam 47: David Hume: We Have No Substantial Self With Which We Are Identical14 Questions
Exam 48: Baron Dholbach: We Are Completely Determined10 Questions
Exam 49: William James: The Dilemma of Determinism13 Questions
Exam 50: Roderick M.Chisholm: Human Freedom and the Self15 Questions
Exam 51: Harry Frankfurt: Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person15 Questions
Exam 52: David Hume: Liberty and Necessity15 Questions
Exam 53: Wt Stace: Compatibilism13 Questions
Exam 54: Ruth Benedict: Morality Is Relative15 Questions
Exam 55: James Rachels: Morality Is Not Relative13 Questions
Exam 56: Plato: Why Should I Be Moral Gygess Ring and Socratess Dilemma15 Questions
Exam 57: Louis P Pojman: Egoism and Altruism: A Critique of Ayn Rand14 Questions
Exam 58: Joel Feinberg: Psychological Egoism13 Questions
Exam 59: Immanuel Kant: The Moral Law8 Questions
Exam 60: John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism7 Questions
Exam 61: Russ Shafer-Landau: Consequentialism: Its Difficulties14 Questions
Exam 62: Aristotle: The Ethics of Virtue9 Questions
Exam 63: Virginia Held: The Ethics of Care9 Questions
Exam 64: Alison M.Jaggar: Feminist Ethics15 Questions
Exam 65: Annette C.Baier: The Need for More Than Justice12 Questions
Exam 66: Jean-Paul Sartre: Existentialist Ethics8 Questions
Exam 67: James Rachels: The Divine Command Theory15 Questions
Exam 68: Thomas Nagel: Moral Luck15 Questions
Exam 69: Susan Wolf: Moral Saints13 Questions
Exam 70: Robert Paul Wolff: In Defense of Anarchism15 Questions
Exam 71: Thomas Hobbes: The Absolutist9 Questions
Exam 72: John Locke: The Democratic4 Questions
Exam 73: John Stuart Mill: A Classical Liberal Answer15 Questions
Exam 74: John Rawls: The Contemporary Liberal Answer9 Questions
Exam 75: Robert Nozick: Against Liberalism15 Questions
Exam 76: Martin Luther King Jr: Nonviolence and Racial Justice13 Questions
Exam 77: Susan Moller Okin: Justice, Gender, and the Family15 Questions
Exam 78: Mary Wollstonecraft: A Vindication of the Rights of Women15 Questions
Exam 79: Epicurus: Moderate Hedonism15 Questions
Exam 80: Epictetus: Stoicism: Enchiridion15 Questions
Exam 81: Albert Camus: Life Is Absurd14 Questions
Exam 82: Julian Baggini: Living Life Forward9 Questions
Exam 83: Louis P Pojman: Religion Gives Meaning to Life15 Questions
Exam 84: Thomas Nagel: The Absurd15 Questions
Exam 85: Richard Taylor: The Meaning of Life15 Questions
Exam 86: Susan Wolf: Meaning in Life15 Questions
Exam 87: Don Marquis: Why Abortion Is Immoral11 Questions
Exam 88: Francis J Beckwith: Arguments From Bodily Rights15 Questions
Exam 89: Mary Anne Warren: on the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion12 Questions
Exam 90: Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion11 Questions
Exam 91: Jane English: The Moderate Position: Beyond the Personhood Argument12 Questions
Exam 92: Burton Leiser: The Death Penalty Is Permissible15 Questions
Exam 93: Hugo Adam Bedau: No, the Death Penalty Is Not Morally Permissible15 Questions
Exam 94: Lawrence Blum: Racism: Its Core Meaning14 Questions
Exam 95: Kwame Anthony Appiah: Racisms11 Questions
Exam 96: Peter Singer: Famine, Affluence, and Morality15 Questions
Exam 97: Garrett Hardin: Living on a Lifeboat91 Questions
Select questions type
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-Marquis sees abortion as a form of murder.
Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(71)
Correct Answer:
True
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-Marquis's view entails that euthanasia is wrong.
Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(86)
Correct Answer:
False
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-Marquis thinks that it is morally permissible for a pregnant woman to have an abortion in self-defense.
Free
(True/False)
4.8/5
(64)
Correct Answer:
False
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-Marquis says that what makes killing wrong is neither its effect on the murderer nor its effect on the victim's friends and relatives.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(65)
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-Marquis seemed to have no objections to Judith Jarvis Thompson's argument.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(73)
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-The natural law position on abortion as articulated in Roman Catholicism is that the fetus is an innocent person from the moment of viability.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(77)
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-Marquis thinks that only infants, children, and adults can be said to have a future.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(88)
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-Marquis argues that killing someone is wrong because it is illegal.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(79)
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-What makes killing wrong in Marquis's view is
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(70)
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-Marquis's view entails that it is prima facie seriously wrong to kill children and infants.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(93)
Susan Wolf, philosopher and author of Meaning in Life and Why It Matters, argues that meaning in life must consist of both subjective and objective elements. As she says, "meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." Active engagement is involvement in something that grips or excites a person, something that arouses passion. But this subjective response alone is not enough to add significant meaning to someone's life. Mere passion about an activity is, in itself, insufficient to contribute meaningfulness to a life. The passion must be directed at projects that are in themselves worthwhile. "What is clear to me," she says, "is that there can be no sense to the idea of meaningfulness without a distinction between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one's time, where the test of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment."
This view belies the often expressed notion that what someone does doesn't matter as long as the person enjoys it or prefers it or gets satisfaction out of it. But people do wonder sometimes if an activity they enjoy is in fact worthwhile. Some people with satisfying lives do feel that their existence is meaningless.
-Marquis accepts Warren's argument.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(76)
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)