Exam 5: Resources and Trade: the Heckscher-Ohlin Model
Exam 1: Introduction37 Questions
Exam 2: World Trade: an Overview18 Questions
Exam 3: Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: the Ricardian Model47 Questions
Exam 4: Specific Factors and Income Distribution62 Questions
Exam 5: Resources and Trade: the Heckscher-Ohlin Model66 Questions
Exam 6: The Standard Trade Model45 Questions
Exam 7: External Economies of Scale and the International Location of Production37 Questions
Exam 8: Firms in the Global Economy: Export Decisions, Outsourcing, and Multinational Enterprises69 Questions
Exam 9: The Instruments of Trade Policy71 Questions
Exam 10: The Political Economy of Trade Policy57 Questions
Exam 11: Trade Policy in Developing Countries33 Questions
Exam 12: Controversies in Trade Policy46 Questions
Exam 13: National Income Accounting and the Balance of Payments72 Questions
Exam 14: Exchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market: an Asset Approach74 Questions
Exam 15: Money, Interest Rates, and Exchange Rates65 Questions
Exam 16: Price Levels and the Exchange Rate in the Long Run79 Questions
Exam 17: Output and the Exchange Rate in the Short Run114 Questions
Exam 18: Fixed Exchange Rates and Foreign Exchange Intervention80 Questions
Exam 19: International Monetary Systems: an Historical Overview153 Questions
Exam 20: Financial Globalization: Opportunity and Crisis113 Questions
Exam 21: Optimum Currency Areas and the Euro99 Questions
Exam 22: Developing Countries: Growth, Crisis, and Reform112 Questions
Select questions type
Suppose Australia, a land (K)-abundant country, and Sri Lanka, a labor(L)-abundant country, both produce labor and land intensive goods with the same technology.
-Refer to above figure. Imagine that the relative capital abundance of Australia was so much greater than that of Sri Lanka, that we would have to locate Australia far to the right on the K/L axis. If this were so far to the right that there was no area of overlap on the w/r axis, then what product would Australia export? Which product will each of the trade partners export? Will the relative wages as calculated now be the same or different in both Australia and Sri Lanka?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(90)
If a good is capital intensive it means that the good is produced
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(79)
If the price of the capital -intensive product rises more than does the price of the land- intensive product, then
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(67)
The Heckscher-Ohlin model differs from the Ricardian model of Comparative Advantage in that the former
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(75)
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, an influx of workers from across the border would
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(83)
Which of the following empirical studies provided the most support for the heckscher-Ohlin model?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(75)
Assume that only two countries, A and B, exist.
-Refer to the table above. You are told that Country B has no minimum wage or child labor laws. Now the correct answer is
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(88)
Assume that only two countries, A and B, exist.
-Refer to the table above. If good S is capital intensive, then following the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(79)
Factor-intensity reversals describe a situation in which the production of a product may be land intensive in one country, and relatively labor intensive in another (at given relative wage levels). For example, cotton may be land intensive in the U.S., and labor intensive in Egypt where land is relatively scarce and expensive. Suppose factor-intensity reversals were common. How would that affect the conclusion that a country in which land is relatively scarce will not be the country with a comparative advantage in the land-intensive product?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(76)
One of the commonly used assumptions in deriving the Heckscher-Ohlin model is that tastes are homothetic, or that if the per capita incomes were the same in two countries, the proportions of their expenditures allocated to each product would be the same as it is in the other country. Imagine that this assumption is false, and that in fact, the tastes in each country are strongly biased in favor of the product in which it has a comparative advantage. How would this affect the relationship between relative factor abundance between the two countries, and the nature (factor-intensity) of the product each exports? What if the taste bias favored the imported good?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(80)
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, the country with a relative abundance of ________ will have a production possibility frontier that is biased toward production of the ________ good.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(72)
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, trade will ________ the owners of a country's ________ factor and will ________ the good that uses that factor intensively.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(78)
Countries do not in fact export the goods the H.O. theory predicts. Discuss.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(92)
Empirical observations on actual North-South trade patterns tend to
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(72)
If Gambinia has many workers but very little land and even less productive capital, then, following the Heckscher-Ohlin model, in order to improve the country's economic welfare, the Gambinian government should
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(84)
One way in which the Heckscher-Ohlin model differs from the Ricardo model of comparative advantage is by assuming that ________ is (are) identical in all countries.
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(81)
Showing 21 - 40 of 66
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)