Exam 13: War and the Quest for Peace
Evaluate Stassen's "ten practices of just peacemaking." How are these practices consistent with pacifist principles? How could employment of these principles move the world toward global peace?
Stassen's "ten practices of just peacemaking" are consistent with pacifist principles in several ways. First, they emphasize the importance of nonviolent conflict resolution and the rejection of violence as a means to achieve peace. This aligns with pacifist beliefs that violence only begets more violence and that true peace can only be achieved through nonviolent means.
Additionally, the practices promote the idea of addressing the root causes of conflict, such as poverty, injustice, and oppression, which is also in line with pacifist principles. Pacifists believe in addressing the underlying issues that lead to violence and conflict, rather than simply using force to suppress them.
Employment of these principles could move the world toward global peace by promoting a shift in mindset and approach to conflict resolution. By prioritizing nonviolent methods and addressing root causes, these practices can help to de-escalate conflicts and prevent them from erupting into violence. This could lead to a more peaceful and just global society, where conflicts are resolved through dialogue, understanding, and cooperation rather than through force and aggression.
Furthermore, by addressing the root causes of conflict, these practices can help to create a more equitable and just world, where people are less likely to resort to violence as a means of addressing their grievances. This could ultimately lead to a more peaceful and stable global community, where conflicts are less frequent and less severe.
In conclusion, Stassen's "ten practices of just peacemaking" are consistent with pacifist principles and have the potential to move the world toward global peace by promoting nonviolent conflict resolution and addressing the root causes of conflict. By employing these principles, we can work towards a more peaceful and just world for all.
Many ancient Hebrew prophets saw warfare as a __________.
B
Thomas Aquinas developed the idea of a __________ war.
C
Part of the difficulty of working toward peace is that the difference between peace and war is not always __________.
The possibility of violent explosion is perpetuated by global __________.
How have disparate conditions in countries around the globe made our world ripe for violent conflict? What kinds of actions can we take to address the problem?
Some people see Christian participation in war as a duty of their __________.
"__________ participation" refers to participation in war under protest or with serious ethical concern.
Analyze the requirements of the Geneva Convention. Do you think that these rules make war more humane?
The term jihad means __________ and does not mean committing a terrorist act.
Take a position on whether war can ever be moral from a Christian ethical perspective. Draft an argument advocating your position.
For Aquinas's model to work, the war must be conducted __________.
Is war ever the lesser of two evils? Explain the morality of your answer. If you believe it is, what kinds of circumstances might war, then, be the lesser evil?
Nuclear weapons are so concerning because they have the ability to destroy __________.
What did Reinhold Niebuhr mean by "the relevance of an impossible ideal."
Compare ancient Hebrew attitudes toward war with modern Christian conceptions. In what ways are they similar or different?
__________ is the use or threat of violence to arouse fear in order to accomplish an ulterior purpose.
How has the introduction of nuclear and chemical weapons changed the ethical landscape regarding war? In what ways do the abilities of these weapons to cause mass destruction raise new ethical concerns?
The __________ Convention is an example of universally agreed-upon rules of war.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)