Exam 8: Answering Moral Questions
Exam 1: An Introduction to Arguments64 Questions
Exam 2: Moral Arguments50 Questions
Exam 3: Reasoning With Obligations53 Questions
Exam 4: Reasoning About Consequences58 Questions
Exam 5: Reasoning With Virtues and Vices57 Questions
Exam 6: Reasoning With Principles and Counterexamples73 Questions
Exam 7: Reasoning With Analogies59 Questions
Exam 8: Answering Moral Questions70 Questions
Exam 9: Skepticism, Subjectivism, and Relativism76 Questions
Exam 10: Religion and Moral Reasoning65 Questions
Exam 11: Normative Theories, Part 189 Questions
Exam 12: Normative Theories, Part 273 Questions
Exam 13: Aristotle's Ethics: Exploring Virtue and Justice1 k+ Questions
Select questions type
Brainstorming arguments for your view is the first step in the six-step process for answering moral questions that was outlined in Chapter 8.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(75)
One important way to resist confirmation bias is to be especially skeptical of information and arguments that support your existing views.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(87)
The six-step process for answering moral questions that was outlined in Chapter 8 works only for questions about the morality of specific actions.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(80)
An argument commits the strawman fallacy when it criticizes a distorted version of another argument.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(73)
Identifying a specific moral question is the first step in the six-step process for answering moral questions that was outlined in Chapter 8.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(77)
One part of confirmation bias is the tendency to seek out only information that supports your existing views.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(81)
The point of Chapter 8's six-step process of answering moral questions is to prepare you to defend your existing moral views against philosophical criticism.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(88)
One part of confirmation bias is to seek out arguments that conflict with our existing views so that we can criticize them.
(True/False)
5.0/5
(90)
What is a "salient answer" to a question, as explained in Chapter 8?
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(84)
An undercutting objection aims to show that an argument is not cogent without showing that the conclusion is false.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(68)
If an argument commits the fallacy of equivocation, you can often show that the argument fails by replacing a word or phrase with a synonym.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(82)
Which of the following arguments commits the fallacy of equivocation?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(81)
Which of the following is NOT listed in Chapter 8 as a reason to count an answer as a "salient answer" to a moral question?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(74)
In your own words, explain the strawman fallacy. What is wrong with it as an objection to an argument?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(91)
The KEEPING UP WITH THE GAMBINOS objection in Chapter 8 argues that the key normative premise in the UNFAIR DISADVANTAGE argument is false. This makes KEEPING UP WITH THE GAMBINOS:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(86)
Confirmation bias is a tendency to seek out and pay more attention to information that supports your existing views.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(77)
An objection must include a conclusion and at least one premise.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(78)
Which of the following is NOT discussed in Chapter 8 as a good way to gather information about your chosen topic when trying to answer a moral question?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(75)
Showing 21 - 40 of 70
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)