Exam 8: Answering Moral Questions
Which of the following best captures the basic problem with an argument that commits the fallacy of equivocation?
B
A rebutting objection aims to show that the conclusion of another argument is false.
True
What is the ad hominem fallacy? Give an example, other than one discussed in the book.
The ad hominem fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone attacks the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making an argument rather than addressing the substance of the argument itself. The term "ad hominem" is Latin for "to the person." This fallacy is used to undermine the opponent's position by attacking the individual, thus diverting the discussion away from the actual issues at hand.
An example of the ad hominem fallacy that is not commonly discussed in textbooks might be as follows:
During a debate on environmental policy, Speaker A argues that the government should invest more in renewable energy to reduce carbon emissions. Speaker B responds by saying, "Speaker A drives a large SUV and frequently flies in private jets, so his argument for reducing carbon emissions is not credible."
In this example, Speaker B does not address the merits of Speaker A's argument for renewable energy investment. Instead, Speaker B attacks Speaker A's personal choices regarding transportation, implying that these choices invalidate Speaker A's argument. This is an ad hominem attack because it focuses on Speaker A's character and personal behavior rather than the argument for renewable energy investment. The fact that Speaker A may not perfectly practice what he advocates does not inherently negate the validity of his argument for renewable energy policy.
Which of the following best explains the idea of confirmation bias?
What is the point of the six-step process for answering moral questions that was outlined in Chapter 8?
An objection to a moral argument must contain at least one premise.
Which of the following is NOT recommended in Chapter 8 as a way to resist confirmation bias?
Which of the following is NOT one of the steps in the six-step process for answering moral questions that was outlined in Chapter 8?
Which of the following best captures the six-step process for answering moral questions that was outlined in Chapter 8?
According to Chapter 8, it is never acceptable to use partisan sources to gather information about or find arguments related to a moral issue.
At what point in the six-step process for answering moral questions should you decide which answer you are going to accept? Why?
According to Chapter 8, what is a "salient answer" to a question?
In your own words, explain the six-step process for answering moral questions that was outlined in Chapter 8.
The fallacy of equivocation involves criticizing the person who made an argument instead of the argument itself.
What is confirmation bias? Why is it a problem? What are three things you can do to resist confirmation bias?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)