Question 1

According to Miranda v.Arizona (1966),law enforcement must inform the individual in custody of his or her right to an attorney.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 2

Explain how the U.S.Supreme Court has changed the interpretation of the Fourth Amendment.

Accepted Answer

Answers will vary,but students

Question 3

The U.S.Supreme Court created the good faith exception in the case of

Accepted Answer

A)  ​Nix v. Williams (1980). 
B)  ​Hester v. U.S. (1924). 
C)  ​Texas v. Johnson (1989). 
D)  ​U.S. v. Leon (1984). 
A)  ​Nix v. Williams (1980). 
B)  ​Hester v. U.S. (1924). 
C)  ​Texas v. Johnson (1989). 
D)  ​U.S. v. Leon (1984).

Question 4

The Warren Court established that the exclusionary rule applied to the states.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 5

When an urgent situation of significant social importance outweighs the necessity of respecting individuals' rights,this is referred to as the _______ exception.

Accepted Answer

A)  ​plain view 
B)  ​public safety 
C)  ​exigent circumstances 
D)  ​stop-and-frisk 
A)  ​plain view 
B)  ​public safety 
C)  ​exigent circumstances 
D)  ​stop-and-frisk

Question 6

In Nix v.Williams (1984),the U.S.Supreme Court agreed that the improperly obtained evidence can be used when it would later have been inevitably discovered without improper actions by the police.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 7

Explain the Miranda warnings and what the significance is behind the use of the warnings in interrogations.

Accepted Answer

​Answers will vary,but student

Question 8

The U.S.Supreme Court created the exclusionary rule in the case of

Accepted Answer

A)  ​Mapp v. Ohio (1961). 
B)  ​Miranda v. Arizona (1966). 
C)  ​Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993). 
D)  ​Weeks v. U.S.(1914). 
A)  ​Mapp v. Ohio (1961). 
B)  ​Miranda v. Arizona (1966). 
C)  ​Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993). 
D)  ​Weeks v. U.S.(1914).

Question 9

Which of the following does not allow the use of the exclusionary rule?

Accepted Answer

A)  ​Murder trial 
B)  ​Federal court 
C)  ​State court with no appellate system 
D)  ​Grand jury proceeding 
A)  ​Murder trial 
B)  ​Federal court 
C)  ​State court with no appellate system 
D)  ​Grand jury proceeding

Question 10

Explain the inevitable discovery exception as it relates to Nix v.Williams (1984).

Accepted Answer

Answers will vary,but students

Question 11

According to Pennsylvania Board of Pardons and Parole v.Scott (1998),improperly obtained evidence cannot be used at parole revocation proceedings.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 12

Officer Castro notices a car in front of him driving at a slow rate of speed. The driver seems to be driving erratically.Officer Castro activates his blue lights and attempts to pull the car over. The driver continues to drive for approximately two additional miles before pulling over. When Officer Castro slowly approaches the car, he smells what seems to be a heavy fragrance of marijuana. The driver has dilated eyes and slurred speech. There are four individuals in the car.
-Officer Castro intended for this traffic stop to be a brief seizure,which would be considered a(n)

Accepted Answer

A)  ​stop. 
B)  ​search. 
C)  ​arrest. 
D)  ​interrogation. 
A)  ​stop. 
B)  ​search. 
C)  ​arrest. 
D)  ​interrogation.

Question 13

In your opinion,do the constitutional rights of citizens "tie the hands" of the police to a significant degree? Explain your answer.

Accepted Answer

​Answers will vary,b

Question 14

Even if a police officer is acting in the interests of public safety,he or she must obtain a warrant before searching an area.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 15

Compare and contrast the plain view doctrine and the open fields doctrine.What is the key difference between them?

Accepted Answer

Answers will vary,but students

Question 16

When an officer stops a car and it becomes necessary to search,how extensively can the officer search the vehicle?What are the parameters that the officer must abide by?

Accepted Answer

​Answers will vary,but student

Question 17

The U.S.Supreme Court created the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule in the case of

Accepted Answer

A)  ​Nix v. Williams (1980). 
B)  ​West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1935). 
C)  ​Weeks v. U.S. (1914). 
D)  ​Brown v. Mississippi (1936). 
A)  ​Nix v. Williams (1980). 
B)  ​West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1935). 
C)  ​Weeks v. U.S. (1914). 
D)  ​Brown v. Mississippi (1936).

Question 18

The stop-and-frisk exception is considered a(n)____________________ search.

Accepted Answer

The answer of The stop-and-frisk exception is considered a(n)____________________ search....

Question 19

Officer Castro notices a car in front of him driving at a slow rate of speed. The driver seems to be driving erratically.Officer Castro activates his blue lights and attempts to pull the car over. The driver continues to drive for approximately two additional miles before pulling over. When Officer Castro slowly approaches the car, he smells what seems to be a heavy fragrance of marijuana. The driver has dilated eyes and slurred speech. There are four individuals in the car.
-Officer Castro required that the car in question pull over.Typically,this could be considered a(n)

Accepted Answer

A)  ​search. 
B)  ​seizure. 
C)  ​interrogation. 
D)  ​arrest. 
A)  ​search. 
B)  ​seizure. 
C)  ​interrogation. 
D)  ​arrest.

Question 20

Miranda warnings involve the right to counsel and the right to remain silent.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

According to Miranda v.Arizona (1966),law enforcement must inform the individual in custody of his or her right to an attorney.

Explain how the U.S.Supreme Court has changed the interpretation of the Fourth Amendment.

The U.S.Supreme Court created the good faith exception in the case of

The Warren Court established that the exclusionary rule applied to the states.

When an urgent situation of significant social importance outweighs the necessity of respecting individuals' rights,this is referred to as the _______ exception.

In Nix v.Williams (1984),the U.S.Supreme Court agreed that the improperly obtained evidence can be used when it would later have been inevitably discovered without improper actions by the police.

Explain the Miranda warnings and what the significance is behind the use of the warnings in interrogations.

The U.S.Supreme Court created the exclusionary rule in the case of

Which of the following does not allow the use of the exclusionary rule?

Explain the inevitable discovery exception as it relates to Nix v.Williams (1984).

According to Pennsylvania Board of Pardons and Parole v.Scott (1998),improperly obtained evidence cannot be used at parole revocation proceedings.

In your opinion,do the constitutional rights of citizens "tie the hands" of the police to a significant degree? Explain your answer.

Even if a police officer is acting in the interests of public safety,he or she must obtain a warrant before searching an area.

Compare and contrast the plain view doctrine and the open fields doctrine.What is the key difference between them?

When an officer stops a car and it becomes necessary to search,how extensively can the officer search the vehicle?What are the parameters that the officer must abide by?

The U.S.Supreme Court created the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule in the case of

The stop-and-frisk exception is considered a(n)____________________ search.

Miranda warnings involve the right to counsel and the right to remain silent.

Crime and Justice in America.

Victimization and Criminal Behavior.

The Criminal Justice System.

Criminal Justice and the Rule of Law

Police

Police Officers and Law Enforcement Operations.

Policing: Contemporary Issues and Challenges.

Courts and Pretrial Processes.

Prosecution and Defense

Determination of Guilt: Plea Bargaining and Trials.

Punishment and Sentencing.

Corrections.

Community Corrections: Probation and Intermediate Sanctions.

Incarceration and Prison Society.

Reentry Into the Community

Juvenile Justice.

Filters

Exam 8: Police and Constitutional Law.

According to Miranda v.Arizona (1966),law enforcement must inform the individual in custody of his or her right to an attorney.

Explain how the U.S.Supreme Court has changed the interpretation of the Fourth Amendment.

The U.S.Supreme Court created the good faith exception in the case of

The Warren Court established that the exclusionary rule applied to the states.

When an urgent situation of significant social importance outweighs the necessity of respecting individuals' rights,this is referred to as the _______ exception.

In Nix v.Williams (1984),the U.S.Supreme Court agreed that the improperly obtained evidence can be used when it would later have been inevitably discovered without improper actions by the police.

Explain the Miranda warnings and what the significance is behind the use of the warnings in interrogations.

The U.S.Supreme Court created the exclusionary rule in the case of

Which of the following does not allow the use of the exclusionary rule?

Explain the inevitable discovery exception as it relates to Nix v.Williams (1984).

According to Pennsylvania Board of Pardons and Parole v.Scott (1998),improperly obtained evidence cannot be used at parole revocation proceedings.

In your opinion,do the constitutional rights of citizens "tie the hands" of the police to a significant degree? Explain your answer.

Even if a police officer is acting in the interests of public safety,he or she must obtain a warrant before searching an area.

Compare and contrast the plain view doctrine and the open fields doctrine.What is the key difference between them?

When an officer stops a car and it becomes necessary to search,how extensively can the officer search the vehicle?What are the parameters that the officer must abide by?

The U.S.Supreme Court created the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule in the case of

The stop-and-frisk exception is considered a(n)____________________ search.

Miranda warnings involve the right to counsel and the right to remain silent.

Crime and Justice in America.

Victimization and Criminal Behavior.

The Criminal Justice System.

Criminal Justice and the Rule of Law

Police

Police Officers and Law Enforcement Operations.

Policing: Contemporary Issues and Challenges.

Courts and Pretrial Processes.

Prosecution and Defense

Determination of Guilt: Plea Bargaining and Trials.

Punishment and Sentencing.

Corrections.

Community Corrections: Probation and Intermediate Sanctions.

Incarceration and Prison Society.

Reentry Into the Community

Juvenile Justice.

Filters