Exam 5: Categorical Syllogisms

Syllogistic Form 1E Given the following syllogistic form: No P are M. $\frac{\text { Some } \mathrm{S} \text { are not } \mathrm{M} \text {. }}{\text { Some } \mathrm{S} \text { are not } \mathrm{P} \text {. }}$ -For Syllogistic Form 1E, the mood and figure is:

Given the following enthymeme: Wherever guns are readily available senseless killings occur, and guns are readily available in the U.S. The statement needed to convert the enthymeme into a valid syllogism is:

Syllogism 3A Given the following syllogism: Jack can't be a mechanic because every mechanic owns tools, and Jack does not own any tools. -For Syllogism 3A, the minor premise is:

Syllogism 1E Given the following syllogism: Some workers without papers are licensed drivers, so some workers with papers are not documented citizens, for some undocumented citizens are not unlicensed drivers. -After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 1E, the conclusion is:

Given the following enthymeme: Religions are dangerous if they lead to violence, and fundamentalist religions lead to violence. The statement needed to convert the enthymeme into a valid syllogism is:

Given the following syllogism: All animals are pigs. No mammals are pigs. $\overline{\text{Some mammals are not animals.}}$ This syllogism:

Given the following syllogism: No tigers are bears. All unicorns are bears. Some unicorns are not tigers. This syllogism commits the existential fallacy from:

Syllogistic Form 6G Given the following syllogistic form: No M are P. $\frac{\text { Some } \mathrm{S} \text { are not } \mathrm{M} \text {. }}{\text { Some } \mathrm{S} \text { are not } \mathrm{P} \text {. }}$ -For Syllogistic Form 6G, the correct mood and figure is:

Syllogism 3C Given the following syllogism: There are applicants who are not trustworthy, because whoever has a criminal record is untrustworthy, and several applicants have criminal records. -For Syllogism 3C, the major premise is:

Syllogism 4A Given the following syllogism: Movies are not sexy unless they have nude scenes, so Dark Interlude is sexy because it has nude scenes. -After translating Syllogism 4A into standard form, the conclusion is:

Syllogism 1D Given the following syllogism: All unrewarding occupations are unsatisfying jobs, because no meaningless employments are satisfying jobs and all meaningful employments are rewarding occupations. -For Syllogism 1D, the major premise is:

Syllogism 2G Given the following syllogism: All caffeinated beverages are nonalcoholic drinks, so some alcoholic drinks are not drinks with fizz, since some drinks without fizz are not decaffeinated beverages. -For Syllogism 2G, the minor premise is:

Syllogism 2H Given the following syllogism: No happy marriages are planned arrangements, so some unplanned arrangements are fulfilling relationships, because some unhappy marriages are not unfulfilling relationships. -For Syllogism 2H, the major premise is:

Syllogistic Form 2D Given the following syllogistic form: Some M are not P. Some S are M.   Some S are not P. -For Syllogistic Form 2D, the mood and figure is:

Syllogistic Form 6A Given the following syllogistic form: No P are M. Some S are M.   Some S are not P. -For Syllogistic Form 6A, after filling in the Venn diagram,

Syllogism 1C Given the following syllogism: No altered photos are accurate representations, so some inaccurate representations are attractive images, since some unaltered photos are not unattractive images. -For Syllogism 1C, the major premise is:

Syllogism 3H Given the following syllogism: A few snakes have fangs, so there are snakes that are not friendly, for whatever has fangs is unfriendly. -For Syllogism 3H, the major premise is:

Given the following enthymeme: Harold must be guilty. After all, he was arrested. The statement needed to convert the enthymeme into a valid syllogism is:

Syllogism 1A Given the following syllogism: No untalented bards are compelling writers, so some uncompelling writers are not uninspired poets, for some inspired poets are talented bards. -After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 1A, the conclusion is:

Given the following sorites: No S are A. All N are A. All T are N. $\frac{\text {Some R are T. }}{\text {Some R are not S. }}$ This sorites is: