Exam 5: Categorical Syllogisms

Syllogistic Form 2A Given the following syllogistic form: All M are P. All M are S.   Some S are P. -For Syllogistic Form 2A, after filling in the Venn diagram,

Syllogism 2A Given the following syllogism: Some uncontaminated salads are healthy meals, for some appetizing foods are contaminated salads, and all unhealthy meals are unappetizing foods. -After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 2A, the conclusion is:

Syllogism 3D Given the following syllogism: Edward gets angry whenever customers complain. Thus, Edward must have been angry yesterday, because customers were complaining yesterday. -For Syllogism 3D, the minor premise is:

Given the following enthymeme: Religions are dangerous if they lead to violence, and fundamentalist religions lead to violence. The statement needed to convert the enthymeme into a valid syllogism is:

Given the following syllogism: All unicorns are horses. No tigers are horses. No tigers are unicorns. This syllogism is:

Syllogistic Form 1F Given the following syllogistic form: No P are M. $\frac{\text { No } S \text { are } \mathrm{M}}{\text { No } S \text { are } P \text {. }}$ -For Syllogistic Form 1F, after filling in the Venn diagram,

Syllogistic Form 5H Given the following syllogistic form: All $\mathrm { P }$ are $\mathrm { M }$ . $\frac{\text { All S are M.}}{\text { All S are P.}}$ -For Syllogistic Form 5H, the answer from the Boolean standpoint is:

Syllogistic Form 3A Given the following syllogistic form: No P are $M$ . All Mare S. $\overline{\text{No S are \(P\).}}$ -For Syllogistic Form 3A, the mood and figure is:

Syllogistic Form 5C Given the following syllogistic form: No P are M. All S are M.   Some S are not P. -For Syllogistic Form 5C, the answer from the Boolean standpoint is:

Sorites 1I Given the following sorites: Some M are H. All G are Q. All S are G. $\frac{\text { No H are Q.}}{\text { Some M are not S.}}$ -For Sorites 1I, the second intermediate conclusion is:

Syllogism 2C Given the following syllogism: No dogs that do not love children are reliable watchdogs, since all dogs that don't bite are unreliable watchdogs, and no dogs that love children are dogs that bite. -After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 2C, the conclusion is:

Syllogistic Form 2H Given the following syllogistic form: No P are M. $\frac{\text {All S are M. }}{\text {Some S are not P. }}$ -For Syllogistic Form 2H, the mood and figure is:

Syllogistic Form 2I Given the following syllogistic form: No P are M. $\frac{\text { Some S are M . }}{\text { Some S are not P . }}$ -For Syllogistic Form 2I, the mood and figure is:

Syllogistic Form 3I Given the following syllogistic form: Some M are not P. $\frac{\text { Some S are M . }}{\text { Some S are not P . }}$ -For Syllogistic Form 3I, after filling in the Venn diagram,

Syllogistic Form 1G Given the following syllogistic form: All $\mathrm{M}$ are $\mathrm{P}$ . Some $\mathrm{S}$ are $\mathrm{M}$ . $\overline {\text{Some S are not} \mathrm{P}}$ . -For Syllogistic Form 1G, after filling in the Venn diagram,

Given the following sorites: Some M are R. All R are H. All H are D. $\frac{\text { No } K \text { are D. }}{\text { Some } \mathrm{K} \text { are not } \mathrm{M}}$ This sorites is:

Syllogism 4F Given the following syllogism: Only those students who were invited are going to the party. Hence, since a few freshmen were not invited, there are freshmen who are not going to the party. -For Syllogism 4F, the minor premise is:

Syllogistic Form 5G Given the following syllogistic form: Some P are M. $\frac{\text { No } \mathrm{M} \text { are } \mathrm{S} \text {. }}{\text { Some } \mathrm{S} \text { are } \mathrm{P} \text {. }}$ -For Syllogistic Form 5G, the correct mood and figure is:

Sorites 1C Given the following sorites: All G are B. Some S are T. No G are K. No T are B.   Some K are not S. -For Sorites 1C, the second intermediate conclusion is:

Syllogism 2D Given the following syllogism: Some low class characters are not people with money, so some people without money are not honest souls, since no dishonest souls are high class characters. -For Syllogism 2D, the minor premise is: