Exam 5: Categorical Syllogisms

Syllogism 1G Given the following syllogism: Some bad judges are lawyers, since some lawyers are prejudiced magistrates, and all good judges are unprejudiced magistrates. -For Syllogism 1G, the minor premise is:

Syllogism 2H Given the following syllogism: No happy marriages are planned arrangements, so some unplanned arrangements are fulfilling relationships, because some unhappy marriages are not unfulfilling relationships. -After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 2H, the conclusion is:

Syllogism 1I Given the following syllogism: No unpopular monarchs are autocrats with vision, so some autocrats without vision are not insane leaders, for some sane leaders are popular monarchs. -After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 1I, the conclusion is:

Sorites 1A Given the following sorites: Some N are $F$ . All $\mathrm { K }$ are $\mathrm { R }$ . All $\mathrm { T }$ are $\mathrm { K }$ . No $\mathrm { F }$ are $\mathrm { R }$ . $\overline{\text{Some N are not T}}$ . -For Sorites 1A, the second intermediate conclusion is:

Syllogistic Form 3H Given the following syllogistic form: Some P are not M. $\frac{\text {Some M sre S. }}{\text { Some S are not P.}}$ -For Syllogistic Form 3H, after filling in the Venn diagram,

Syllogism 2H Given the following syllogism: No happy marriages are planned arrangements, so some unplanned arrangements are fulfilling relationships, because some unhappy marriages are not unfulfilling relationships. -For Syllogism 2H, the minor premise is:

Syllogistic Form 5C Given the following syllogistic form: No P are M. All S are M.   Some S are not P. -For Syllogistic Form 5C, after filling in the Venn diagram,

Syllogistic Form 6A Given the following syllogistic form: No P are $M$ . Some S are M. $\overline{\text{Some S are not P}}$ -For Syllogistic Form 6A, the mood and figure is:

Syllogism 4E Given the following syllogism: Spencer is happy whenever he wins at poker, and he won tonight. Thus, Spencer is happy tonight. -After translating Syllogism 4E into standard form, the conclusion is:

Categorical Proposition 1I Given the categorical proposition: "Some houseboats that are leaky are not vessels that are safe dwellings." -For Sorites 1A, the correct standard form is:

Syllogism 2E Given the following syllogism: No unbearable experiences are pleasant flights, because all bumpy flights are unpleasant flights and all smooth flights are bearable experiences. -After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 2E, the conclusion is:

Syllogistic Form 1F Given the following syllogistic form: No P are M. $\frac{\text { No } S \text { are } \mathrm{M}}{\text { No } S \text { are } P \text {. }}$ -For Syllogistic Form 1F, the mood and figure is:

Sorites 1D Given the following sorites: Some S are R. No B are S. All R are H. All M are B.   Some H are not M. -Given the following sorites: Some G are A. No G are K. All N are K. All F are N.   No F are A. This sorites is:

Syllogistic Form 6C Given the following syllogistic form: No M are P. Some M are not S.   Some S are not P. -Given the following syllogistic form: All P are M. All M are S.   Some S are P. This form is:

Syllogism 2E Given the following syllogism: No unbearable experiences are pleasant flights, because all bumpy flights are unpleasant flights and all smooth flights are bearable experiences. -For Syllogism 2E, the major premise is:

Syllogism 4F Given the following syllogism: Only those students who were invited are going to the party. Hence, since a few freshmen were not invited, there are freshmen who are not going to the party. -For Syllogism 4F, the major premise is:

Sorites 1H Given the following sorites: All R are F. Some K are N. No R are A. $\frac{\text { No N are } F}{\text { Some } \mathrm{A} \text { are not } \mathrm{K} \text {. }}$ -For Sorites 1H, the second intermediate conclusion is:

Syllogism 2D Given the following syllogism: Some low class characters are not people with money, so some people without money are not honest souls, since no dishonest souls are high class characters. -For Syllogism 2D, the major premise is:

Syllogism 3I Given the following syllogism: Taffy must not be a dog because Taffy climbs trees and dogs never climb trees. -For Syllogism 3I, the minor premise is:

Given the following enthymeme: Chewing tobacco is not a safe substitute for cigarettes. After all, it causes cancer of the mouth. The statement needed to convert the enthymeme into a valid syllogism is: