Exam 15: National Decision-Making Institutions: Presidential Government

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Of the following terms, which best captures the presidential of the United States?

Free
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(87)
Correct Answer:
Verified

D

What are the key differences between a parliamentary system and a presidential system? Which is able to make important policies more easily? Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(75)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The key differences between a parliamentary system and a presidential system lie in the structure of the government and the distribution of power. In a parliamentary system, the executive branch is led by a prime minister who is chosen from the legislative branch, while in a presidential system, the president is elected separately from the legislature and serves as both the head of state and the head of government.

In a parliamentary system, the prime minister and the cabinet are accountable to the legislature, and the government can be removed through a vote of no confidence. This allows for more flexibility and quicker decision-making, as the executive and legislative branches are more closely aligned. In a presidential system, the president has more independence and is not directly accountable to the legislature, which can lead to more gridlock and slower policy-making.

In terms of making important policies more easily, a parliamentary system may have an advantage due to the closer relationship between the executive and legislative branches. This can allow for quicker and more efficient decision-making, as the government can more easily pass legislation and implement policies. However, this can also lead to a lack of checks and balances, potentially allowing for the abuse of power.

On the other hand, a presidential system's separation of powers can lead to more deliberation and debate, which can prevent hasty or ill-considered policies from being enacted. While this may result in slower policy-making, it can also prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals.

Whether one system is better at making important policies more easily is subjective and depends on the specific context and the values of the society in question. Some may see the efficiency of a parliamentary system as a positive, while others may value the deliberative nature of a presidential system. Ultimately, the effectiveness of a system in making important policies depends on the political culture, the strength of institutions, and the ability of leaders to work together for the common good.

Under what circumstances would a "president" have an easier time creating social capital than his/her counterpart in a parliamentary system?

Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(77)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

A president would have an easier time creating social capital than his/her counterpart in a parliamentary system under circumstances where there is a strong sense of national identity and unity. In a presidential system, the president is directly elected by the people and often serves as a unifying figure for the country. This direct mandate from the people can give the president a greater sense of legitimacy and authority, making it easier for them to build social capital.

Additionally, in a presidential system, the president typically has a fixed term in office and cannot be easily removed through a vote of no confidence, as is the case in a parliamentary system. This stability can allow the president to focus on long-term social capital building efforts without the constant threat of being ousted from office.

Furthermore, in a presidential system, the president often has more direct control over the executive branch and can implement policies and initiatives without the need for approval from a separate legislative body. This can make it easier for the president to take decisive action and demonstrate leadership, which can contribute to the creation of social capital.

Overall, a president may have an easier time creating social capital than a counterpart in a parliamentary system when there is a strong national identity, stability in office, and the ability to take decisive action without the constraints of a separate legislative body.

The United States House of Representatives:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(66)

Critical Thinking Policy-making in the 21st century is a very complex challenge. Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of threads of policy weave together into some kind of composite approach to solving problems and promoting development. "Comprehensive" policy-making would presumably mean that policies were broad, thorough and effective in the face of tough problems. Think about parliamentary and presidential systems and all their upsides and downsides. Can you draw any conclusion about which form of political system is likely more effective as we move more deeply into this century?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(81)

The fixed terms of a presidential system give the system more flexibility and more ability to make unpopular policies given common term limits.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(88)

The hybrid presidential system is well characterized by:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(93)

_____________________ is found in almost all political systems that fragment power and is rare in those that do not.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(75)

Compared to a parliamentary system, a presidential system:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(71)

Democratic presidential systems are most common in:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(68)

France is an example of a political system that after World War II changed from a presidential to a parliamentary political system.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(71)

The best-known example of a democratic presidential system is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(84)

In the French system, when the executive and the legislature are controlled by different parties the term the French use is ________________________.

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(73)

In presidential systems, there is a much less clear path to top leadership positions than in a parliamentary system. Given this, there is also a greater likelihood that a top leader will have less experience with public policy-making or, at least, a longer learning curve.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(93)

In a presidential system, it is quite possible that different political parties will "control" the legislature and the executive. In this situation, conflicts are easily resolved because the system design generally makes then "coequal."

(True/False)
4.8/5
(79)

What are the typical roles and the overall power of a democratically elected legislature in a presidential system such as the United States?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(84)

What are the main advantages and disadvantages of the presidential system in the United States? Would the United States be better served with a parliamentary system of government?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(74)

In a presidential system, cabinet members are far more likely to have government experience than is the case in a parliamentary system.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(68)

The most dominant political figure in the United States in 2013 was:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(90)

Greenstein's "qualities" of political leadership include: proficiency as a communicator; organizational capacity; _____________________; vision; cognitive style; and emotional intelligence.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(77)
Showing 1 - 20 of 26
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)