Exam 6: Product and Strict Liability

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

According to the doctrine of strict liability, which of the following parties is strictly liable for injuries caused by a defective product?

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(81)

Intentional misrepresentation occurs when a seller or lessor ________.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(82)

A defect in manufacture occurs when the manufacturer fails to warn customers about the dangerous propensities of its products.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(73)

A defendant who has not been negligent but is made to pay a strict liability judgment can bring a separate action against the negligent party in the chain of distribution to recover his losses.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(89)

Describe the functions of the statute of limitations and the statute of repose.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(80)

A toy manufacturer sells G.I. Joe figurines containing detachable limbs and weapons that could be swallowed by small children. It can be subject to a strict liability action owing to a defect in design.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(80)

________ refers to a defect that occurs when a manufacturer does not place information about the dangers of using a product on its packaging, causing injury if the dangers are unknown.

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(71)

Which of the following statements is true about strict liability?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(84)

Under the doctrine of strict liability, bystanders who are injured by a defective product are entitled to the same protection as the consumers or users.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(77)

Under a theory of strict liability, who in the chain of distribution may be held strictly liable for injuries caused by a defective product? What public policy considerations are behind the inclusion of all of these parties in the list of possible defendants?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(73)

________ refers to a statute that limits the seller's liability to a certain number of years from the date when the product was first sold.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(73)

Clive buys a rifle from Gun Manufacturing Company and goes hunting. During the hunting expedition, he accidentally shoots himself in the foot. Which of the following would be true of this case?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(70)

Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, if the defendant is 50 percent responsible for injuries worth $10,000 suffered by the plaintiff, then the defendant must pay $5,000 in damages.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(96)

________ is a tort doctrine that makes manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, retailers, and others in the chain of distribution of a defective product liable for the damages caused by the defect, irrespective of fault.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(89)

________ is a doctrine that says automobile manufacturers are under a duty to design automobiles by taking into account the possibility of harm from a person's body striking something inside the automobile in the case of a car crash.

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(62)

Inadequate testing of a product can support a product liability lawsuit based on strict liability.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(79)

Bill buys a truck and replaces the regular tires with large tires to turn the vehicle into a monster truck. When he tries to drive the truck, the oversized tires cause the truck to roll over and crash. Bill then files a strict liability lawsuit against the truck manufacturer to recover for his injuries. Which of the following is the best defense for truck manufacturer in this lawsuit?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(72)

Intentional misrepresentation occurs when a seller or lessor conceals a defect in a product.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(75)

Clayton Inc. is a toy manufacturer that has released a new line of action figures. The toys are meant for children between the ages of one and two. However, they come with tiny detachable weapons that can be accidentally swallowed by children of that age. Which of the following defects do the action figures have that will make them strictly liable for any injuries caused?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(89)

Ruggers Corp. is a maker of a range of highly popular cruise motorcycles. Tim buys a Ruggers motorcycle from a dealership and suffers an accident. While recuperating from his injuries, he learns that Ruggers has recalled all motorcycles it had manufactured and sold in the previous two years, owing to a previously unknown defect in their braking systems. Tim brings a product liability lawsuit against the motorcycle manufacturer and claims $50,000 in damages. The defect in the motorcycle is found to be half responsible for the accident, while Tim's own negligence of traffic rules contributed to the rest. Under the doctrine of contributory negligence, what would be the ruling of the court hearing this case?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(72)
Showing 41 - 60 of 86
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)