Exam 2: Opinion Give and Take
The Aristotelian mode of proof concerned with logical, rational argument is called:
A
Respond to the quotation from Michiko Kakutani, cited in your textbook. Kakutani writes that an individual's reluctance to embrace civil, informed debate about important issues "represents a failure to fully engage with the world, a failure to test one's convictions against the logic and passions of others. It suggests a closing off of the possibilities of growth and transformation and a repudiation of the process of consensus building." Discuss this statement in light of a contemporary social controversy, explaining how increased civility, public discussion, and informed debate could make a difference.
Michiko Kakutani's quotation emphasizes the importance of engaging in civil, informed debate about important issues. In today's society, one contemporary social controversy that could benefit from increased civility, public discussion, and informed debate is the issue of climate change.
The debate surrounding climate change is often polarized, with individuals and groups holding strong convictions on either side of the issue. This polarization has led to a lack of meaningful dialogue and consensus building, hindering progress towards effective solutions. By embracing civil, informed debate, individuals and groups can test their convictions against the logic and passions of others, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of the issue.
Increased civility in the climate change debate would create a more welcoming environment for individuals with differing viewpoints to engage in productive discussions. This would allow for the exploration of a wider range of potential solutions and the building of consensus on actionable steps to address the issue.
Public discussion and informed debate on climate change would also help to educate the public on the complexities of the issue, leading to a more informed and engaged citizenry. This, in turn, could lead to increased support for policies and initiatives aimed at mitigating the effects of climate change.
In conclusion, embracing civil, informed debate on the issue of climate change and other important societal issues is crucial for fostering growth, transformation, and consensus building. By engaging in open and respectful dialogue, individuals and groups can work towards finding common ground and developing effective solutions to complex problems.
According to Aristotle, common rhetorical appeals should be accessible to people who cannot follow complicated lines of argument.
True
Which of the following is not a component of the definition of argument offered by Hostetler and Kahl?
Good arguments engage others, promote growth, and can even build consensus.
Discuss the three practical guidelines that Hostetler and Kahl offer for becoming good arguers. Why and how is arguing related to positive leadership qualities?
Which one of the following is not a practical guideline that is listed in your textbook for becoming a better arguer?
In the Toulmin model of argument, a warrant is a statement offered for the consideration of others.
The term "argument" implies the willingness of communicators to engage in dialogue.
Engaging in reasoned argument is often a better form of leadership than merely issuing orders. Yet, in our society, arguing is often associated with:
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)