Exam 8: Experimental Designs: Between-Subjects Design

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Researchers use random assignment in an effort to create groups that are as similar as possible.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(71)

If there are many individual differences that could confound your study, what is the best approach for creating equivalent groups in that case?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(84)

The primary limitation of a two-group design is that it ____.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(74)

Differential attrition can threaten the internal validity of a between-subjects experiment.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(73)

In a between-subjects design, the separate groups must be as ____.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(70)

A between-subjects experiment with 25 scores in treatment I and 25 scores in treatment II must have a total of 25 participants in the experiment.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(77)

An advantage of holding a variable constant rather than using random assignment to form your groups is that holding a variable constant ____.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(87)

Compared to within-subjects designs, between-subjects designs require relatively ____.

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(96)

Using a small sample size can help minimize the problems with variance.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(72)

When comparing means in a two-group design, which statistical analysis is most appropriate?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(75)

In a between-subjects design, individual differences (participant variables) are a problem because they can ____.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(86)

Researchers typically try to ____.

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(69)

A between-subjects experiment comparing three treatments requires three separate groups of participants.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(69)

Holding a participant characteristic (such as age or gender) constant strengthens ____ and weakens ____.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(82)

Holding a variable constant guarantees that the variable cannot become a confounding variable.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(72)

When comparing means in a single-factor multiple group design, which statistical analysis is most appropriate?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(80)

In a between-subjects experimental design, individual differences can become a confounding variable.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(80)

In a between-subjects experiment, if the participants in one group are noticeably more intelligent than the participants in another group, then participant intelligence is a confounding variable and threatens the internal validity of the experiment.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(76)

Explain the advantages and disadvantages of multiple-group designs.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(82)

Compensatory equalization occurs when ____.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(63)
Showing 21 - 40 of 67
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)