Exam 13: Civil Rights and Employment Discrimination.

CASE 13.2,EEOC v.Abercrombie & Fitch Stores,Inc.(2013)involved a question of whether a clothing retailer violated Title VII when it refused to hire a Muslim woman-applicant because she wore a head scarf in violation of its company dress code,and whether the applicant gave proper notice of a religious accommodation.How did the court rule?

It is not necessary to prove intentional discrimination to prevail in a disparate impact case.

How long must an employee have worked for an employer in order to be eligible for leave provided by the Family and Medical Leave Act?

Specifically set forth what courts consider in order to determine whether there is a hostile or abusive work environment.