Question 1

Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
Consolidation in the Global Pharmaceutical Industry:
The Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham Example
By the mid-1980s, demands from both business and government were forcing pharmaceutical companies to change the way they did business. Increased government intervention, lower selling prices, increased competition from generic drugs, and growing pressure for discounting from managed care organizations such as health maintenance and preferred provider organizations began to squeeze drug company profit margins. The number of contact points between the sales force and the customer shrank dramatically as more drugs were being purchased through managed care organizations and pharmacy benefit managers. Drugs commonly were sold in large volumes and often at heavily discounted levels.
The demand for generic drugs also was declining. The use of formularies, drug lists from which managed care doctors are required to prescribe, gave doctors less choice and made them less responsive to direct calls from the sales force. The situation was compounded further by the ongoing consolidation in the hospital industry. Hospitals began centralizing purchasing and using stricter formularies, allowing physicians virtually no leeway to prescribe unlisted drugs. The growing use of formularies resulted in buyers needing fewer drugs and sharply reduced the need for similar drugs.
The industry's first major wave of consolidations took place in the late 1980s, with such mergers as SmithKline and Beecham and Bristol Myers and Squibb. This wave of consolidation was driven by increased scale and scope economies largely realized through the combination of sales and marketing staffs. Horizontal consolidation represented a considerable value creation opportunity for those companies able to realize cost synergies. In analyzing the total costs of pharmaceutical companies, William Pursche (1996) argued that the potential savings from mergers could range from 15-25% of total R&D spending, 5-20% of total manufacturing costs, 15-50% of marketing and sales expenses, and 20-50% of overhead costs.
Continued consolidation seemed likely, enabling further cuts in sales and marketing expenses. Formulary-driven purchasing and declining overall drug margins spurred pharmaceutical companies to take action to increase the return on their R&D investments. Because development costs are not significantly lower for generic drugs, it became increasingly difficult to generate positive financial returns from marginal products. Duplicate overhead offered another opportunity for cost savings through consolidation, because combining companies could eliminate redundant personnel in such support areas as quality assurance, manufacturing management, information services, legal services, accounting, and human resources.
The second merger wave began in the late 1990s. The sheer magnitude and pace of activity is striking. Of the top-20 companies in terms of global pharmaceutical sales in 1998, one-half either have merged or announced plans to do so. More are expected as drug patents expire for a number of companies during the next several years and the cost of discovering and commercializing new drugs continues to escalate.
On January 17, 2000, British pharmaceutical giants Glaxo Wellcome PLC and SmithKline Beecham PLC agreed to merge to form what was at the time the world's largest drug company. The merger was valued at $76 billion. The resulting company was called Glaxo SmithKline and had annual revenue of $25 billion and a market value of $184 billion. The combined companies also would have a total R&D budget of $4 billion and a global sales force of 40,000. Total employees would number 105,000 worldwide. Although stressed as a merger of equals, Glaxo shareholders would own about 59% of the shares of the two companies. The combined companies would have a market share of 7.5% of the global pharmaceutical market. The companies projected annual pretax cost savings of about $1.76 billion after 3 years. The cost savings would come primarily from job cuts among middle management and administration over the next 3 years
:
-What are the alternatives to merger available to the major pharmaceutical companies? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative?

Accepted Answer

The answer of Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
Consolidation in...

Question 2

Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
CenturyTel Buys Qwest Communications to Cut Costs and Buy Time as the Landline Market Shrinks
Key Points:
• Market segmentation can be used to identify "underserved" segments which may sustain firms whose competitive position in larger markets is weak.
• A firm's competitive relative is best viewed in comparison to those firms competing in its served market rather than with industry leading firms.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
In what could best be described as a defensive acquisition, CenturyTel, the fifth largest local phone company in the United States, acquired Qwest Communications, the country's third largest, in mid-2010 in a stock swap valued at $10.6 billion. While both firms are dwarfed in size by AT&T and Verizon, these second-tier telecommunications firms will control a larger share of the shrinking landline market. 
The combined firms will have about 17 million phone lines serving customers in 37 states. This compares to AT&T and Verizon with about 46 and 32 million landline customers, respectively. The deal would enable the firms to reduce expenses in the wake of the annual 10 percent decline in landline usage as people switch from landlines to wireless and cable connections. Expected annual cost savings total $575 million; additional revenue could come from upgrading Qwest's landlines to handle DSL Internet. 
In 2010, about one-fourth of U.S. homes used only cell phones, and cable behemoth Comcast, with 7.6 million residential and business phone subscribers, ranked as the nation's fourth largest landline provider. CenturyTel has no intention of moving into the wireless and cable markets, which are maturing rapidly and are highly competitive. 
While neither Qwest nor CenturyTel owns wireless networks and therefore cannot offset the decline in landline customers as AT&T and Verizon are attempting to do, the combined firms are expected to thrive in rural areas where they have extensive coverage. In such geographic areas, broadband cable Internet access and fiber-optics data transmission line coverage are is limited. The lack of fast cable and fiber-optics transmission makes voice over Internet protocol (VOIP)-Internet phone service offered by cable companies and independent firms such as Vonage-unavailable. Consequently, customers are forced to use landlines if they want a home phone. Furthermore, customers in these areas must use landlines to gain access to the Internet through dial-up access or through a digital subscriber line (DSL). 
Discussion Questions
1. How would you describe CenturyTel's business strategy? Be specific.
2. Describe the key factors both external and internal to the firm that you believe are driving this strategy.
3. Why might the acquisition of Qwest be described as defensive?
Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
Oracle Continues Its Efforts to Consolidate the Software Industry
Oracle CEO Larry Ellison continued his effort to implement his software industry strategy when he announced the acquisition of Siebel Systems Inc. for $5.85 billion in stock and cash on September 13, 2005. The global software industry includes hundreds of firms. During the first nine months of 2005, Oracle had closed seven acquisitions, including its recently completed $10.6 billion hostile takeover of PeopleSoft. In each case, Oracle realized substantial cost savings by terminating duplicate employees and related overhead expenses. The Siebel acquisition accelerates the drive by Oracle to overtake SAP as the world's largest maker of business applications software, which automates a wide range of administrative tasks. The consolidation strategy seeks to add the existing business of a competitor, while broadening the customer base for Oracle's existing product offering.
 Siebel, founded by Ellison's one-time protégé turned bitter rival, Tom Siebel, gained prominence in Silicon Valley in the late 1990s as a leader in customer relationship management (CRM) software. CRM software helps firms track sales, customer service, and marketing functions. Siebel's dominance of this market has since eroded amidst complaints that the software was complicated and expensive to install. Moreover, Siebel ignored customer requests to deliver the software via the Internet. Also, aggressive rivals, like SAP and online upstart Salesforce.com have cut into Siebel's business in recent years with simpler offerings. Siebel's annual revenue had plunged from about $2.1 billion in 2001 to $1.3 billion in 2004.
 In the past, Mr. Ellison attempted to hasten Siebel's demise, declaring in 2003 that Siebel would vanish and putting pressure on the smaller company by revealing he had held takeover talks with the firm's CEO, Thomas Siebel. Ellison's public announcement of these talks heightened the personal enmity between the two CEOs, making Siebel an unwilling seller.
 Oracle's intensifying focus on business applications software largely reflects the slowing growth of its database product line, which accounts for more than three fourths of the company's sales.
 Siebel's technology and deep customer relationships give Oracle a competitive software bundle that includes a database, middleware (i.e., software that helps a variety of applications work together as if they were a single system), and high-quality customer relationship management software. The acquisition also deprives Oracle competitors, such as IBM, of customers for their services business.
 Customers, who once bought the so-called best-of-breed products, now seek a single supplier to provide programs that work well together. Oracle pledged to deliver an integrated suite of applications by 2007. What brought Oracle and Siebel together in the past was a shift in market dynamics. The customer and the partner community is communicating quite clearly that they are looking for an integrated set of products.
 Germany's SAP, Oracle's major competitor in the business applications software market, played down the impact of the merger, saying they had no reason to react and described any deals SAP is likely to make as "targeted, fill-in acquisitions." For IBM, the Siebel deal raised concerns about the computer giant's partners falling under the control of a competitor. IBM and Oracle compete fiercely in the database software market. Siebel has worked closely with IBM, as did PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards, which had been purchased by PeopleSoft shortly before its acquisition by Oracle. Retek, another major partner of IBM, had also been recently acquired by Oracle. IBM had declared its strategy to be a key partner to thousands of software vendors and that it would continue to provide customers with IBM hardware, middleware, and other applications.
-Describe the key factors both external and internal to the firm that you believe are driving this strategy.

Accepted Answer

The answer of Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
CenturyTel Buys...

Question 3

A corporate mission statement should be defined as broadly as possible since it seeks to describe the corporation's reason for being,and it should not exclude the firm from pursuing any significant opportunities.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 4

All of the following represent commonly found components of a well-constructed business plan except for

Accepted Answer

A)  Mission statement 
B)  Strategy 
C)  Acquisition plan 
D)  Objectives 
E)  Tactical or implementation plans

Question 5

HP Redirects Its Mobile Device Business Strategy with the Acquisition of Palm
With global PC market growth slowing, Hewlett-Packard (HP), number one in PC sales worldwide, sought to redirect its business strategy for mobile devices. Historically, the firm has relied on such partners as Microsoft to provide the operating systems for its mobile phones and tablet computer products. However, the strategy seems to have contributed to the firm's declining smartphone sales by limiting its ability to differentiate its products and by delaying new mobile product introductions. 
HP has been selling a smartphone version of its iPaq handheld device since 2007, although few consumers even knew HP made such devices, since its products were aimed at business people. Sales of iPaq products fell to $172 million in 2009 from $531 million in 2007 and to less than $100 million (excluding sales of Palm products) in 2010. 
With smartphone sales expected to exceed laptop sales in 2012, according to industry consultant IDC, HP felt compelled to move aggressively into the market for handheld mobile devices. The major challenge facing HP is to overcome the substantial lead that Apple, Google, and Research-In-Motion (RIM) have in the smartphone market. 
To implement the new business strategy, HP acquired Palm in mid-2010 in a deal valued at $1.4 billion (including warrants and convertible preferred stock). HP acquired Palm at a time when its smartphone sales were sliding, with Palm's share of the U.S. market dropping below 5 percent in 2010. Palm was slow to recognize the importance of applications (apps) designed specifically for smartphones in driving sales. Palm has several hundred apps, while the number for Apple's iPhone and Google's Android are in the tens of thousands. 
HP is hoping to leverage Palm's smartphone operating system (webOS) to become a leading competitor in the rapidly growing smartphone market, a market that had been largely pioneered by Palm. HP hopes that webOS will provides an ideal common "platform" to link the firm's mobile devices and create a unique experience for the user of multiple HP mobile devices. The intent is to create an environment where users can get a common look and feel and a common set of services irrespective of the handset they choose. 
HP also acquired 452 patents and another 406 applications on file. Palm offers one key potential competitive advantage in that its operating system can run several tasks at once, just as a PC does; however, other smartphones are expected to have this capability in the near future.
By buying Palm, HP signals a "go it alone" strategy in smartphones and tablet computers at the expense of Microsoft. HP is also hoping that by having a proprietary system, they will be able to differentiate their mobile products in a way that Apple and Google have in introducing their proprietary operating systems and distinguishing "look and feel." 
Through its sales of computer servers, software, and storage systems, HP has significant connections with telecommunications carriers like Verizon that could help promote devices based on Palm's technology. Also, because of its broad offering of PCs, printers, and other consumer electronics products, HP has leverage over electronics retailers for shelf space.
Discussion Questions
1. To what extent could the acquisition of Palm by HP be viewed as a "make versus buy decision" by HP?
2. How would you characterize the HP strategy for mobility products (cost leadership, differentiation, focus, or a hybrid) and why?
Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
BofA Acquires Countrywide Financial Corporation
On July 1, 2008, Bank of America Corp (BofA) announced that it had completed its acquisition of mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp (Countrywide) for $4 billion, a 70 percent discount from the firm's book value at the end of 2007. Countrywide originates, purchases, and securitizes residential and commercial loans; provides loan closing services, such as appraisals and flood determinations; and performs other residential real estate-related services. This marked another major (but risky) acquisition by Bank of America's chief executive Kenneth Lewis in recent years. BofA's long-term intent has been to become the nation's largest consumer bank, while achieving double-digit earnings growth. The acquisition would help the firm realize that vision and create the second largest U.S. bank. In 2003, BofA paid $48 billion for FleetBoston Financial, which gave it the most branches, customers, and checking deposits of any U.S. bank. In 2005, BofA became the largest credit card issuer when it bought MBNA for $35 billion.
The purchase of the troubled mortgage lender averted the threat of a collapse of a major financial institution because of the U.S. 2007-2008 subprime loan crisis. U.S. regulators were quick to approve the takeover because of the potentially negative implications for U.S. capital markets of a major bank failure. Countrywide had lost $1.2 billion in the third quarter of 2007. Countrywide's exposure to the subprime loan market (i.e., residential loans made to borrowers with poor or nonexistent credit histories) had driven its shares down by almost 80 percent from year-earlier levels. The bank was widely viewed as teetering on the brink of bankruptcy as it lost access to the short-term debt markets, its traditional source of borrowing.
Bank of America deployed 60 analysts to Countrywide's headquarters in Calabasas, California. After four weeks of analyzing Countrywide's legal and financial challenges and modeling how its loan portfolio was likely to perform, BofA offered an all-stock deal valued at $4 billion. The deal valued Countrywide at $7.16 per share, a 7.6 discount to its closing price the day before the announcement. BofA issued 0.18 shares of its stock for each Countrywide share. The deal could have been renegotiated if Countrywide experienced a material change that adversely affected the business between the signing of the agreement of purchase and sale and the closing of the deal. BofA made its initial investment of $2 billion in Countrywide in August 2007, purchasing preferred shares convertible to a 16 percent stake in the company. By the time of the announced acquisition in early January 2008, Countrywide had a $1.3 billon paper loss on the investment.
The acquisition provided an opportunity to buy a market leader at a distressed price. The risks related to the amount of potential loan losses, the length of the U.S. housing slump, and potential lingering liabilities associated with Countrywide's questionable business practices. The purchase made BofA the nation's largest mortgage lender and servicer, consistent with the firm's business strategy, which is to help consumers meet all their financial needs. BofA has been one of the relatively few major banks to be successful in increasing revenue and profit following acquisitions by "cross-selling" its products to the acquired bank's customers. Countrywide's extensive retail distribution network enhances BofA's network of more than 6,100 banking centers throughout the United States. BofA had anticipated almost $700 million in after-tax cost savings in combining the two firms. Almost two-thirds of these savings had been realized by the end of 2010. In mid-2010, BofA agreed to pay $108 million to settle federal charges that Countrywide had incorrectly collected fees from 200,000 borrowers who had been facing foreclosure.
-Describe what the likely objectives of the BofA acquisition plan might have been.Be specific.What are the key assumptions implicit in BofA's acquisition plan? What are some of the key risks associated with integrating the Countrywide? In addition to the purchase price,how would you determine BofA's potential resource commitment in making this acquisition?

Accepted Answer

The answer of HP Redirects Its Mobile Device Business Strategy...

Question 6

Which of the following phases of the acquisition process contains a "feedback" loop?

Accepted Answer

A)  Negotiation phase 
B)  Search phase 
C)  Integration phase 
D)  Post-closing evaluation phase 
E)  Closing

Question 7

A differentiation strategy is one in which a firm's products are perceived by customers to be slightly different from other firms' products in the same industry.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 8

Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
Pepsi Buys Quaker Oats in a Highly Publicized Food Fight
On June 26, 2000, Phillip Morris, which owned Kraft Foods, announced its planned $15.9 billion purchase of Nabisco, ranked seventh in the United States in terms of sales at that time. By combining Nabisco with its Kraft operations, ranked number one in the United States, Phillip Morris created an industry behemoth. Not to be outdone, Unilever, the jointly owned British-Dutch giant, which ranked fourth in sales, purchased Bestfoods in a $20.3 billion deal. Midsized companies such as Campbell's could no longer compete with the likes of Nestle, which ranked number three; Proctor & Gamble, which ranked number two; or Phillip Morris. Consequently, these midsized firms started looking for partners. Other companies were cutting back. The U.K.'s Diageo, one of Europe's largest food and beverage companies, announced the restructuring of its Pillsbury unit by cutting 750 jobs-10% of its workforce. PepsiCo, ranked sixth in U.S. sales, spun off in 1997 its Pizza Hut, KFC, and Taco Bell restaurant holdings. Also, eighth-ranked General Mills spun off its Red Lobster, Olive Garden, and other brand-name stores in 1995. In 2001, Coca-Cola announced a reduction of 6000 in its worldwide workforce.
As one of the smaller firms in the industry, Quaker Oats faced a serious problem: it was too small to acquire other firms in the industry. As a result, they were unable to realize the cost reductions through economies of scale in production and purchasing that their competitors enjoyed. Moreover, they did not have the wherewithal to introduce rapidly new products and to compete for supermarket shelf space. Consequently, their revenue and profit growth prospects appeared to be limited.
Despite its modest position in the mature and slow-growing food and cereal business, Quaker Oats had a dominant position in the sports drink marketplace. As the owner of Gatorade, it controlled 85% of the U.S. market for sports drinks. However, its penetration abroad was minimal. Gatorade was the company's cash cow. Gatorade's sales in 1999 totaled $1.83 billion, about 40% of Quaker's total revenue. Cash flow generated from this product line was being used to fund its food and cereal operations. Gatorade's management recognized that it was too small to buy other food companies and therefore could not realize the benefits of consolidation.
After a review of its options, Quaker's board decided that the sale of the company would be the best way to maximize shareholder value. This alternative presented a serious challenge for management. Most of Quaker's value was in its Gatorade product line. It quickly found that most firms wanted to buy only this product line and leave the food and cereal businesses behind. Quaker's management reasoned that it would be in the best interests of its shareholders if it sold the total company rather than to split it into pieces. That way they could extract the greatest value and then let the buyer decide what to do with the non-Gatorade businesses. In addition, if the business remained intact, management would not have to find some way to make up for the loss of Gatorade's substantial cash flow. Therefore, Quaker announced that it was for sale for $15 billion. Potential suitors viewed the price as very steep for a firm whose businesses, with the exception of Gatorade, had very weak competitive positions. Pepsi was the first to make a formal bid for the firm, quickly followed by Coca-Cola and Danone.
By November 21, 2000, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo were battling to acquire Quaker. Their interest stemmed from the slowing sales of carbonated beverages. They could not help noticing the explosive growth in sports drinks. Not only would either benefit from the addition of this rapidly growing product, but they also could prevent the other from improving its position in the sports drink market. Both Coke and PepsiCo could boost Gatorade sales by putting the sports drink in vending machines across the country and selling it through their worldwide distribution network.
PepsiCo's $14.3 billion fixed exchange stock bid consisting of 2.3 shares of its stock for each Quaker share in early November was the first formal bid Quaker received. However, Robert Morrison, Quaker's CEO, dismissed the offer as inadequate. Quaker wanted to wait, since it was expecting to get a higher bid from Coke. At that time, Coke seemed to be in a better financial position than PepsiCo to pay a higher purchase price. Investors were expressing concerns about rumors that Coke would pay more than $15 billion for Quaker and seemed to be relieved that PepsiCo's offer had been rejected. Coke's share price was falling and PepsiCo's was rising as the drama unfolded. In the days that followed, talks between Coke and Quaker broke off, with Coke's board unwilling to support a $15.75 billion offer price.
After failing to strike deals with the world's two largest soft drink makers, Quaker turned to Danone, the manufacturer of Evian water and Dannon yogurt. Much smaller than Coca-Cola or PepsiCo, Danone was hoping to hype growth in its healthy nutrition and beverage business. Gatorade would complement Danone's bottled-water brands. Moreover, Quaker's cereals would fit into Danone's increasing focus on breakfast cereals. However, few investors believed that the diminutive firm could finance a purchase of Quaker. Danone proposed using its stock to pay for the acquisition, but the firm noted that the purchase would sharply reduce earnings per share through 2003. Danone backed out of the talks only 24 hours after expressing interest, when its stock got pummeled on the news.
Nearly 1 month after breaking off talks to acquire Quaker Oats because of disagreements over price, PepsiCo once again approached Quaker's management. Its second proposal was the same as its first. PepsiCo was now in a much stronger position this time, especially because Quaker had run out of suitors. Under the terms of the agreement, Quaker Oats would be liable for a $420 million breakup fee if the deal was terminated, either because its shareholders didn't approve the deal or the company entered into a definitive merger agreement with an alternative bidder. Quaker also granted PepsiCo an option to purchase 19.9% of Quaker's stock, exercisable only if Quaker is sold to another bidder. Such a tactic sometimes is used in conjunction with a breakup fee to discourage other suitors from making a bid for the target firm.
With the purchase of Quaker Oats, PepsiCo became the leader of the sports drink market by gaining the market's dominant share. With more than four-fifths of the market, PepsiCo dwarfs Coke's 11% market penetration. This leadership position is widely viewed as giving PepsiCo, whose share of the U.S. carbonated soft drink market is 31.4% as compared with Coke's 44.1%, a psychological boost in its quest to accumulate a portfolio of leading brands.
:
-Why did food industry consolidation prompt Quaker to announce that it was for sale?

Accepted Answer

The answer of Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
Pepsi Buys...

Question 9

Planning in advance of a merger or an acquisition necessarily slows down decision making.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 10

Firms adopting a focus strategy tend to concentrate their efforts by selling a few products to a single market and compete primarily on price.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 11

HP Redirects Its Mobile Device Business Strategy with the Acquisition of Palm
With global PC market growth slowing, Hewlett-Packard (HP), number one in PC sales worldwide, sought to redirect its business strategy for mobile devices. Historically, the firm has relied on such partners as Microsoft to provide the operating systems for its mobile phones and tablet computer products. However, the strategy seems to have contributed to the firm's declining smartphone sales by limiting its ability to differentiate its products and by delaying new mobile product introductions. 
HP has been selling a smartphone version of its iPaq handheld device since 2007, although few consumers even knew HP made such devices, since its products were aimed at business people. Sales of iPaq products fell to $172 million in 2009 from $531 million in 2007 and to less than $100 million (excluding sales of Palm products) in 2010. 
With smartphone sales expected to exceed laptop sales in 2012, according to industry consultant IDC, HP felt compelled to move aggressively into the market for handheld mobile devices. The major challenge facing HP is to overcome the substantial lead that Apple, Google, and Research-In-Motion (RIM) have in the smartphone market. 
To implement the new business strategy, HP acquired Palm in mid-2010 in a deal valued at $1.4 billion (including warrants and convertible preferred stock). HP acquired Palm at a time when its smartphone sales were sliding, with Palm's share of the U.S. market dropping below 5 percent in 2010. Palm was slow to recognize the importance of applications (apps) designed specifically for smartphones in driving sales. Palm has several hundred apps, while the number for Apple's iPhone and Google's Android are in the tens of thousands. 
HP is hoping to leverage Palm's smartphone operating system (webOS) to become a leading competitor in the rapidly growing smartphone market, a market that had been largely pioneered by Palm. HP hopes that webOS will provides an ideal common "platform" to link the firm's mobile devices and create a unique experience for the user of multiple HP mobile devices. The intent is to create an environment where users can get a common look and feel and a common set of services irrespective of the handset they choose. 
HP also acquired 452 patents and another 406 applications on file. Palm offers one key potential competitive advantage in that its operating system can run several tasks at once, just as a PC does; however, other smartphones are expected to have this capability in the near future.
By buying Palm, HP signals a "go it alone" strategy in smartphones and tablet computers at the expense of Microsoft. HP is also hoping that by having a proprietary system, they will be able to differentiate their mobile products in a way that Apple and Google have in introducing their proprietary operating systems and distinguishing "look and feel." 
Through its sales of computer servers, software, and storage systems, HP has significant connections with telecommunications carriers like Verizon that could help promote devices based on Palm's technology. Also, because of its broad offering of PCs, printers, and other consumer electronics products, HP has leverage over electronics retailers for shelf space.
Discussion Questions
1. To what extent could the acquisition of Palm by HP be viewed as a "make versus buy decision" by HP?
2. How would you characterize the HP strategy for mobility products (cost leadership, differentiation, focus, or a hybrid) and why?
Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
BofA Acquires Countrywide Financial Corporation
On July 1, 2008, Bank of America Corp (BofA) announced that it had completed its acquisition of mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp (Countrywide) for $4 billion, a 70 percent discount from the firm's book value at the end of 2007. Countrywide originates, purchases, and securitizes residential and commercial loans; provides loan closing services, such as appraisals and flood determinations; and performs other residential real estate-related services. This marked another major (but risky) acquisition by Bank of America's chief executive Kenneth Lewis in recent years. BofA's long-term intent has been to become the nation's largest consumer bank, while achieving double-digit earnings growth. The acquisition would help the firm realize that vision and create the second largest U.S. bank. In 2003, BofA paid $48 billion for FleetBoston Financial, which gave it the most branches, customers, and checking deposits of any U.S. bank. In 2005, BofA became the largest credit card issuer when it bought MBNA for $35 billion.
The purchase of the troubled mortgage lender averted the threat of a collapse of a major financial institution because of the U.S. 2007-2008 subprime loan crisis. U.S. regulators were quick to approve the takeover because of the potentially negative implications for U.S. capital markets of a major bank failure. Countrywide had lost $1.2 billion in the third quarter of 2007. Countrywide's exposure to the subprime loan market (i.e., residential loans made to borrowers with poor or nonexistent credit histories) had driven its shares down by almost 80 percent from year-earlier levels. The bank was widely viewed as teetering on the brink of bankruptcy as it lost access to the short-term debt markets, its traditional source of borrowing.
Bank of America deployed 60 analysts to Countrywide's headquarters in Calabasas, California. After four weeks of analyzing Countrywide's legal and financial challenges and modeling how its loan portfolio was likely to perform, BofA offered an all-stock deal valued at $4 billion. The deal valued Countrywide at $7.16 per share, a 7.6 discount to its closing price the day before the announcement. BofA issued 0.18 shares of its stock for each Countrywide share. The deal could have been renegotiated if Countrywide experienced a material change that adversely affected the business between the signing of the agreement of purchase and sale and the closing of the deal. BofA made its initial investment of $2 billion in Countrywide in August 2007, purchasing preferred shares convertible to a 16 percent stake in the company. By the time of the announced acquisition in early January 2008, Countrywide had a $1.3 billon paper loss on the investment.
The acquisition provided an opportunity to buy a market leader at a distressed price. The risks related to the amount of potential loan losses, the length of the U.S. housing slump, and potential lingering liabilities associated with Countrywide's questionable business practices. The purchase made BofA the nation's largest mortgage lender and servicer, consistent with the firm's business strategy, which is to help consumers meet all their financial needs. BofA has been one of the relatively few major banks to be successful in increasing revenue and profit following acquisitions by "cross-selling" its products to the acquired bank's customers. Countrywide's extensive retail distribution network enhances BofA's network of more than 6,100 banking centers throughout the United States. BofA had anticipated almost $700 million in after-tax cost savings in combining the two firms. Almost two-thirds of these savings had been realized by the end of 2010. In mid-2010, BofA agreed to pay $108 million to settle federal charges that Countrywide had incorrectly collected fees from 200,000 borrowers who had been facing foreclosure.
-What options to outright acquisition did BofA have? Why do you believe BofA chose to acquire Countrywide rather than to pursue an alternative strategy?

Accepted Answer

The answer of HP Redirects Its Mobile Device Business Strategy...

Question 12

Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
eBay Struggles to Reinvigorate Growth
Founded in September 1995, eBay views itself as the world's online market place for the sale of goods and services to a diverse community of individuals and small businesses. Currently, eBay has sites in 24 different countries, and it offers a wide variety of tools, features, and services enabling members to buy and sell on its sites. The firm's primary business is Markeplaces consisting of eBay, Shopping.com, and classified websites. In 2006, this business accounted for 90 percent of eBay's sales and profits. Historically, acquisitions made by eBay have always been related to e-commerce. For example, concern about slowing growth in its core U.S. market caused eBay to acquire online payments provider, PayPal, in 2002. The firm achieved significant synergy between eBay and PayPal by facilitating payments between buyers and sellers.
In late 2005, eBay announced that it had acquired Skype International SA, a firm whose software enabled PC users to make calls over the internet, for $2.6 billion. Skype had revenue of $60 million in 2005, a tiny fraction of eBay's $4.4 billion in 2005 sales, and it was unprofitable. Skype's existing businesses include services that give people the ability to call landline phones for about 3 cents a minute, voicemail, and providing a traditional phone number for Skype accounts. Skype is facing new competition from Google, Yahoo!, and many startups.
eBay expects Skype to facilitate trade on their sites by increasing the ability of buyers and sellers to negotiate. In addition to paying eBay listing and completed-auction fees, sellers also could pay eBay a fee for getting an internet call, or lead, via Skype. eBay will also use Skype to facilitate entering new markets, such as new cars, travel, real estate, and personal and business services. Skype software gives eBay an advantage in China, Eastern Europe and Brazil, where online trust is not well-established and where haggling may be more a part of the culture.
The acquisition of a telephony company represented a marked departure for eBay, which had previously acquired companies directly related to e-commerce. eBay is venturing into new territory without any overt request from or support of its buyers and sellers. Historically, buyers and sellers guided eBay into new markets through their activities, such as embracing PayPal years before eBay acquired it, or by requesting new features. In the past when eBAy has gone off on its own, such as collaborating with Christy's for live auctions, it has been unsuccessful. Only time will tell how well this acquisition will work.
:
-Do you believe this acquisition if related or unrelated to eBay's business? What are the implications of your answer..

Accepted Answer

The answer of Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
eBay Struggles...

Question 13

Accounting considerations rarely affect the decision to buy another business rather than to build the business internally.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 14

Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
Pepsi Buys Quaker Oats in a Highly Publicized Food Fight
On June 26, 2000, Phillip Morris, which owned Kraft Foods, announced its planned $15.9 billion purchase of Nabisco, ranked seventh in the United States in terms of sales at that time. By combining Nabisco with its Kraft operations, ranked number one in the United States, Phillip Morris created an industry behemoth. Not to be outdone, Unilever, the jointly owned British-Dutch giant, which ranked fourth in sales, purchased Bestfoods in a $20.3 billion deal. Midsized companies such as Campbell's could no longer compete with the likes of Nestle, which ranked number three; Proctor & Gamble, which ranked number two; or Phillip Morris. Consequently, these midsized firms started looking for partners. Other companies were cutting back. The U.K.'s Diageo, one of Europe's largest food and beverage companies, announced the restructuring of its Pillsbury unit by cutting 750 jobs-10% of its workforce. PepsiCo, ranked sixth in U.S. sales, spun off in 1997 its Pizza Hut, KFC, and Taco Bell restaurant holdings. Also, eighth-ranked General Mills spun off its Red Lobster, Olive Garden, and other brand-name stores in 1995. In 2001, Coca-Cola announced a reduction of 6000 in its worldwide workforce.
As one of the smaller firms in the industry, Quaker Oats faced a serious problem: it was too small to acquire other firms in the industry. As a result, they were unable to realize the cost reductions through economies of scale in production and purchasing that their competitors enjoyed. Moreover, they did not have the wherewithal to introduce rapidly new products and to compete for supermarket shelf space. Consequently, their revenue and profit growth prospects appeared to be limited.
Despite its modest position in the mature and slow-growing food and cereal business, Quaker Oats had a dominant position in the sports drink marketplace. As the owner of Gatorade, it controlled 85% of the U.S. market for sports drinks. However, its penetration abroad was minimal. Gatorade was the company's cash cow. Gatorade's sales in 1999 totaled $1.83 billion, about 40% of Quaker's total revenue. Cash flow generated from this product line was being used to fund its food and cereal operations. Gatorade's management recognized that it was too small to buy other food companies and therefore could not realize the benefits of consolidation.
After a review of its options, Quaker's board decided that the sale of the company would be the best way to maximize shareholder value. This alternative presented a serious challenge for management. Most of Quaker's value was in its Gatorade product line. It quickly found that most firms wanted to buy only this product line and leave the food and cereal businesses behind. Quaker's management reasoned that it would be in the best interests of its shareholders if it sold the total company rather than to split it into pieces. That way they could extract the greatest value and then let the buyer decide what to do with the non-Gatorade businesses. In addition, if the business remained intact, management would not have to find some way to make up for the loss of Gatorade's substantial cash flow. Therefore, Quaker announced that it was for sale for $15 billion. Potential suitors viewed the price as very steep for a firm whose businesses, with the exception of Gatorade, had very weak competitive positions. Pepsi was the first to make a formal bid for the firm, quickly followed by Coca-Cola and Danone.
By November 21, 2000, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo were battling to acquire Quaker. Their interest stemmed from the slowing sales of carbonated beverages. They could not help noticing the explosive growth in sports drinks. Not only would either benefit from the addition of this rapidly growing product, but they also could prevent the other from improving its position in the sports drink market. Both Coke and PepsiCo could boost Gatorade sales by putting the sports drink in vending machines across the country and selling it through their worldwide distribution network.
PepsiCo's $14.3 billion fixed exchange stock bid consisting of 2.3 shares of its stock for each Quaker share in early November was the first formal bid Quaker received. However, Robert Morrison, Quaker's CEO, dismissed the offer as inadequate. Quaker wanted to wait, since it was expecting to get a higher bid from Coke. At that time, Coke seemed to be in a better financial position than PepsiCo to pay a higher purchase price. Investors were expressing concerns about rumors that Coke would pay more than $15 billion for Quaker and seemed to be relieved that PepsiCo's offer had been rejected. Coke's share price was falling and PepsiCo's was rising as the drama unfolded. In the days that followed, talks between Coke and Quaker broke off, with Coke's board unwilling to support a $15.75 billion offer price.
After failing to strike deals with the world's two largest soft drink makers, Quaker turned to Danone, the manufacturer of Evian water and Dannon yogurt. Much smaller than Coca-Cola or PepsiCo, Danone was hoping to hype growth in its healthy nutrition and beverage business. Gatorade would complement Danone's bottled-water brands. Moreover, Quaker's cereals would fit into Danone's increasing focus on breakfast cereals. However, few investors believed that the diminutive firm could finance a purchase of Quaker. Danone proposed using its stock to pay for the acquisition, but the firm noted that the purchase would sharply reduce earnings per share through 2003. Danone backed out of the talks only 24 hours after expressing interest, when its stock got pummeled on the news.
Nearly 1 month after breaking off talks to acquire Quaker Oats because of disagreements over price, PepsiCo once again approached Quaker's management. Its second proposal was the same as its first. PepsiCo was now in a much stronger position this time, especially because Quaker had run out of suitors. Under the terms of the agreement, Quaker Oats would be liable for a $420 million breakup fee if the deal was terminated, either because its shareholders didn't approve the deal or the company entered into a definitive merger agreement with an alternative bidder. Quaker also granted PepsiCo an option to purchase 19.9% of Quaker's stock, exercisable only if Quaker is sold to another bidder. Such a tactic sometimes is used in conjunction with a breakup fee to discourage other suitors from making a bid for the target firm.
With the purchase of Quaker Oats, PepsiCo became the leader of the sports drink market by gaining the market's dominant share. With more than four-fifths of the market, PepsiCo dwarfs Coke's 11% market penetration. This leadership position is widely viewed as giving PepsiCo, whose share of the U.S. carbonated soft drink market is 31.4% as compared with Coke's 44.1%, a psychological boost in its quest to accumulate a portfolio of leading brands.
:
-Why do you think Quaker wanted to sell its consolidated operations rather than to divide the company into the food/cereal and Gatorade businesses?

Accepted Answer

The answer of Case Study Short Essay Examination Questions
Pepsi Buys...

Question 15

Determining where a firm should compete requires management to consider which of the following factors?

Accepted Answer

A)  Determining the firm's current customers only 
B)  Determining the firm's potential customers only 
C)  Determining the needs of current and potential customers, as well as suppliers 
D)  Determining the needs of potential suppliers only 
E)  A and D only

Question 16

Overpayment risk involves the dilution of EPS or a reduction in its growth rate resulting from paying significantly more than the economic value of the acquired firm.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 17

A firm's core competencies refer to those skills which are required to produce the firm's primary products but
which have little or no application in producing related products.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 18

A firm should choose that strategy from among the range of reasonable alternatives that enables it to achieve its stated objectives in an acceptable time period without regard for resource constraints.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 19

Determining how to compete requires a firm's management to consider which of the following factors?

Accepted Answer

A)  Factors critical to successfully competing in its targeted markets 
B)  An external market analysis 
C)  An evaluation of what criteria customers use to make buying decisions 
D)  Availability of product substitutes 
E)  All of the above

Question 20

Coca Cola is an example of a company that pursues both a differentiation and cost leadership strategy.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Exam 4: Planning,developing Business,and Acquisition Plans: Phases 1 and 2 of the Acquisition Process

A corporate mission statement should be defined as broadly as possible since it seeks to describe the corporation's reason for being,and it should not exclude the firm from pursuing any significant opportunities.

All of the following represent commonly found components of a well-constructed business plan except for

Which of the following phases of the acquisition process contains a "feedback" loop?

A differentiation strategy is one in which a firm's products are perceived by customers to be slightly different from other firms' products in the same industry.

Planning in advance of a merger or an acquisition necessarily slows down decision making.

Firms adopting a focus strategy tend to concentrate their efforts by selling a few products to a single market and compete primarily on price.

Accounting considerations rarely affect the decision to buy another business rather than to build the business internally.

Determining where a firm should compete requires management to consider which of the following factors?

Overpayment risk involves the dilution of EPS or a reduction in its growth rate resulting from paying significantly more than the economic value of the acquired firm.

A firm's core competencies refer to those skills which are required to produce the firm's primary products but which have little or no application in producing related products.

A firm should choose that strategy from among the range of reasonable alternatives that enables it to achieve its stated objectives in an acceptable time period without regard for resource constraints.

Determining how to compete requires a firm's management to consider which of the following factors?

Coca Cola is an example of a company that pursues both a differentiation and cost leadership strategy.