Multiple Choice
Sammy entered into an oral contract with Macaulay for the sale of goods amounting to $900.Sammy paid the amount.But Macaulay refused to deliver the goods.Sammy thus suffered serious losses due to Macaulay's breach of contract.Sammy sued Macaulay.At the same time Macaulay took the defense under statute of frauds.Under which principle is Sammy protected?
A) Tortious liability
B) Vicarious liability
C) Part performance
D) Promissory estoppel
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Parol evidence can be used to contradict
Q3: In determining whether a contract is within
Q4: The marriage provision in the statute of
Q5: Jones goes to a clothing store and
Q6: Mr.Green and Mr.Blue contract orally to transfer
Q7: In 17th-century England,before the enactment of the
Q8: The statute of frauds does not require
Q9: The statute of frauds requires that:<br>A)some contracts
Q10: An oral contract for the sale of
Q11: Which of the following contracts is not