Multiple Choice
Salman received information about stocks from Michael Kara, his future brother-in-law, who received inside information from Michael's brother, Maher Kara, who worked at Citigroup's investment banking group. Salman and Michael made numerous identical trades and earned significant income. Michael confessed to federal investigators. Salman was convicted of insider trading but contended that he was an innocent tippee who did not receive information directly from Maher who provided the tips and that Maher did not know he was receiving the information. The appeals court held that there was:
A) no evidence that Maher knew that either Michael or Salman was using the information, so there was no intent to engage in insider trading.
B) no evidence that Maher knew that Michael was passing information to Salman, so Salman was an innocent tippee.
C) evidence that Maher knew Michael was using the information but no evidence that he knew Salman obtained the information, so Salman was an innocent tippee.
D) evidence that Micheal hid the source of the information, so Salman thought he was lucky or smart.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q104: In City of Livonia Employees Retirement System
Q105: What financial disclosure report is not required
Q106: The _ requires that investors be given
Q107: Securities issued by well-known seasoned issuers can
Q108: Despite the detailed listing of security instruments
Q110: The _, which was established by the
Q111: Securities sold in private placements:<br>A) require no
Q112: Although securities sold under a private placement
Q113: What is not an element in the
Q114: Securities issued by well-known seasoned issuers do