Services
Discover
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Engineering
Study Set
A First Look at Communication Theory
Exam 32: Standpoint Theory
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 1
True/False
Sandra Harding's insistence on local knowledge is based upon the claim of traditional Western science that it can discover "Truth" that is value-free and accessible to any objective observer.
Question 2
Multiple Choice
Standpoint theorists see important differences between men and women. Unlike the masculine community, the feminine community uses speech to:
Question 3
Essay
Wood offers two explanations to explain why the standpoints of women and other marginalized groups should be less partial, distorted, or less false than the perspectives of men who are in dominant positions. Outline and discuss the explanations.
Question 4
Essay
What are the social groups to which you belong that shape your standpoint? Are some more influential than the others? How do they affect your view of the world? How is it possible for you to answer these questions objectively?
Question 5
Essay
Harding and Wood claim that the perspectives of those who are marginalized is more "objective," more "complete," and "better" than members of dominant groups. Discuss what they mean by each of these terms and the challenges that are posed by critics. Who do you find more persuasive?
Question 6
Essay
How might standpoint theory sharpen rhetorical analysis, particularly the kind suggested by Aristotle? How do concepts from rhetorical theory help expand and modify standpoint theory?
Question 7
Essay
How might standpoint theorists critique the various theories in the Media and Culture and the Media Effects sections?
Question 8
Multiple Choice
In the context of ethical reflection, identify a true statement about Seyla Benhabib's interactive universalism.
Question 9
Essay
Discuss Wood's efforts to maintain group solidarity. Why is it important? Is it possible, as Wood suggests, to value differences while emphasizing overarching feminist concerns? What might be lost when group solidarity is stressed in this way?