Question 1

Title VII has been successfully used to challenge English-only workplace rules.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 2

In CASE 13.1 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v.R.G.and G.R.Harris Funeral Homes,Inc.(2016),the EEOC sued Funeral Homes on the basis of sex stereotyping after Funeral Homes fired a worker for coming to work in a skirt and jacket,considered female business attire,rather than pants and jacket.How did the court rule?

Accepted Answer

A)  Because transgender status and gender identity are protected under Title VII,the court found that the "only reason that the EEOC cannot pursue a Title VII claim on behalf of Stephens." 
B)  Funeral Homes asserted that the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFR
A) 82 prohibited the EEOC from applying Title VII to force Funeral Homes to violate the "sincerely held religious beliefs" of Rost,Funeral Homes' owner.The court concurred and ruled in favor of Funeral Homes. 
C)  The EEOC contested that Rost's beliefs that allowing a Funeral Homes director who had been born a biological male to wear the skirt-suit uniform for female directors at work would violate God's command was not sincere.The court ruled in favor of the EEOC. 
D)  The court ruled that employers who discriminated against men because they wore dresses and makeup,or acted feminine,were not engaged in illegal sexual stereotyping. 
A)  Because transgender status and gender identity are protected under Title VII,the court found that the "only reason that the EEOC cannot pursue a Title VII claim on behalf of Stephens." 
B)  Funeral Homes asserted that the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFR
A) 82 prohibited the EEOC from applying Title VII to force Funeral Homes to violate the "sincerely held religious beliefs" of Rost,Funeral Homes' owner.The court concurred and ruled in favor of Funeral Homes. 
C)  The EEOC contested that Rost's beliefs that allowing a Funeral Homes director who had been born a biological male to wear the skirt-suit uniform for female directors at work would violate God's command was not sincere.The court ruled in favor of the EEOC. 
D)  The court ruled that employers who discriminated against men because they wore dresses and makeup,or acted feminine,were not engaged in illegal sexual stereotyping.

Title VII has been successfully used to challenge English-only workplace rules.

Law-Value-Creation-And-Risk-Management

Ethics-And-Law

Sources of Law Courts and Dispute Resolution

Constitutional Bases For Business Regulation

Agency

Administrative-Law

Contracts

Sales Licensing and-E Commerce

Torts and Privacy Protection

Product-Liability

Intellectual-Property

The Employment Agreement

Criminal-Law

Environmental-Law-And-Sustainability

Antitrust

Consumer-Protection

Real Property And Land Use

Forms Of Business Organizations

Directors Officers And Controlling Shareholders

Public And Private Offerings Of Securities

Securities Fraud And Insider Trading

Debtor Creditor Relations And Bankruptcy

International Law And Transactions

Filters

Exam 13: Civil Rights and Employment Discrimination

Title VII has been successfully used to challenge English-only workplace rules.

Law-Value-Creation-And-Risk-Management

Ethics-And-Law

Sources of Law Courts and Dispute Resolution

Constitutional Bases For Business Regulation

Agency

Administrative-Law

Contracts

Sales Licensing and-E Commerce

Torts and Privacy Protection

Product-Liability

Intellectual-Property

The Employment Agreement

Criminal-Law

Environmental-Law-And-Sustainability

Antitrust

Consumer-Protection

Real Property And Land Use

Forms Of Business Organizations

Directors Officers And Controlling Shareholders

Public And Private Offerings Of Securities

Securities Fraud And Insider Trading

Debtor Creditor Relations And Bankruptcy

International Law And Transactions

Filters