Exam 20: Legal Liability
Exam 1: An Introduction to Assurance and Financial Statement Auditing46 Questions
Exam 2: The Financial Statement Auditing Environment63 Questions
Exam 3: Audit Planning, Types of Audit Tests, and Materiality74 Questions
Exam 4: Risk Assessment55 Questions
Exam 5: Evidence and Documentation95 Questions
Exam 6: Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit103 Questions
Exam 7: Auditing Internal Control Over Financial Reporting64 Questions
Exam 8: Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls67 Questions
Exam 9: Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances54 Questions
Exam 10: Auditing the Revenue Process94 Questions
Exam 11: Auditing the Purchasing Process80 Questions
Exam 12: Auditing the Human Resource Management Process64 Questions
Exam 13: Auditing the Inventory Management Process74 Questions
Exam 14: Auditing the Financing Investing Process: Prepaid Expenses Intangible Assets and Property Plant and Equipment71 Questions
Exam 15: Auditing the Financing Investing Process: Long-Term Liabilities Stockholders Equity and Income Statement Accounts63 Questions
Exam 16: Auditing the Financinginvesting Process: Cash and Investments68 Questions
Exam 17: Completing the Audit Engagement83 Questions
Exam 18: Reports on Audited Financial Statements74 Questions
Exam 19: Professional Conduct, Independence, and Quality Control72 Questions
Exam 20: Legal Liability65 Questions
Exam 21: Assurance, Attestation, and Internal Auditing Services99 Questions
Select questions type
The most restrictive view under common law is that auditors have no liability to third parties who do not have a privity relationship with the auditor. Briefly define privity and the effect it has on the auditor, client, investors, and creditors under common law.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(81)
Under the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a CPA may be liable if the CPA acted
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(86)
Quincy bought Teal Corp. common stock in an offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Worth & Co., CPAs, gave an unqualified opinion on Teal's financial statements that were included in the registration statement filed with the SEC. Quincy sued Worth under the provisions of the 1933 Act that deal with omission of facts required to be in the registration statement. Quincy must prove that
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(84)
Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, which of the following standards may a CPA use as a defense?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(73)
Which of the following is the best defense a CPA firm can assert in a suit for common law fraud based on its unqualified opinion on materially false financial statements?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(91)
To be successful in a civil action under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 concerning liability for a misleading registration statement, the plaintiff must prove
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(87)
Under the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, a CPA may be liable to any purchaser of a security for certifying materially misstated financial statements that are included in the security's registration statement. Under Section 11, which of the following must be proven by a purchaser of the security?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(91)
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is considered the most sweeping securities law since the 1933 and 1934 Acts. Which item in the list below was not part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(87)
In regards to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), external auditors
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(84)
An auditor can be guilty under federal statutory law if s/he was reckless in performance of her/his professional duties.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(65)
While conducting an audit, Larson Associates, CPAs, failed to detect material misstatements included in its client's financial statements. Larson's unqualified opinion was included with the financial statements in a registration statement and prospectus for a public offering of securities made by the client. Larson knew that its opinion and the financial statements would be used for this purpose. In a suit by a purchaser against Larson for common-law negligence, Larson's best defense would be that the
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(80)
Which of the following is something that the plaintiff must prove in order for an accountant to be liable for damages under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(78)
West & Company, CPAs, was engaged by Sand Corporation to audit its financial statements. West issued an unqualified opinion on Sand's financial statements. Sand has been accused of making negligent misrepresentations in the financial statements that Reed relied upon when purchasing Sand's stock. West was not aware of the misrepresentations and was not negligent in performing the audit. If Reed sues West for damages based on Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, West will
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(93)
Under the "Ultramares" doctrine, to which of the following parties will an accountant be liable for negligence?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(83)
The auditor failing to complete the services agreed to in the contract with the client is subject to liability under breach of contract.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(70)
Jay and Co., CPAs, audited the financial statements of Maco Corp. Jay intentionally gave an unqualified opinion on the financial statements even though material misstatements were discovered as a result of the audit. The financial statements and Jay's unqualified opinion were included in a 10-K (annual report filed with the SEC) for the company. Which of the following statements is correct regarding Jay's liability to a purchaser of the offering under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(84)
Showing 41 - 60 of 65
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)