Exam 8: Negligence and Strict Liability

MATCHING Part II Matching Match each statement with the correct term below.a.Branch of public law created by agencies in the form of rules, regulations, orders, and decisions to carry out regulatory powers and duties.b.Part of private law dealing with rights and duties of individuals among themselves.c.A system of law based upon Roman law which depends upon comprehensive legislative enactments and the inquisitorial system of determining disputes.d.A system of law first developed in England that relies on the judiciary as a source of law and on the adversary system for settling disputes.e.Theory that actions must be judged by their motives and means as well as their results.f.The law establishing duties which, if violated, constitute a wrong against the entire community.g.Theory that society's rewards should be distributed based on market outcomes.h.A body of law based upon principles distinct from common law and providing remedies not available at law.i.A court order requiring a party to do or to refrain from doing a specified act.j.A general legal principle formulated by equity courts.k.Part of substantive law governing relationships among individuals and legal entities.l.Rules for enforcing rights.m.The law dealing with the relationship between government and individuals.n.Party bringing a civil action.o.An equitable remedy invalidating a contract by setting it aside.p.Theory that moral actions are those that produce the greatest net pleasure compared with net pain.q.A court order directing a party to perform a contractual duty.r.The principle found in common law systems that requires courts to apply rules decided in prior cases in deciding substantially similar cases.s.Basic law that creates rights and duties.t.Theory that actions must be judged by what individuals subjectively feel is right or wrong for themselves. -criminal law

Res ipsa loquitur makes it easier for the defendant to prevail in a negligence action.

Negligence per se is a defense in a negligence case.

A widely applied test for causation in fact is the "but for" test.

If an intervening cause is deemed to be a superseding cause, it does not relieve the defendant of liability for that harm.

If the tortious conduct of Mandy is insufficient by itself to cause Alex's harm, Mandy's conduct cannot be considered in combination with Brent's tortious conduct to determine factual cause of Alex's harm.

Match each statement with the correct term below.a.Mental fault; the mental element of a crime.b.A person who enters or remains on the land of another without permission or privilege to do so.c.The nonmental elements of a crime, including the wrongful, physical act.d.Unauthorized use of a person's name or likeness for his own benefit.e.Liability for nonintentional and nonnegligent conduct.f.The duty of care required to avoid being negligent; fictitious individual who is always careful, diligent, and prudent.g.The provision in the Constitution stating that within its sphere, federal law in conformity with the Constitution is supreme, and in cases of conflict, state law must yield.h.A defense to a crime that arises when a law enforcement official induces a person to commit a crime when that person would not have done so otherwise.i.Publication of false statements resulting in harm to another's business or monetary interest.j.The crime of fraudulently taking the property of another by one who was in lawful possession of the property.k.The crime of entering a building with intent to commit a felony.l.Injury to a person's reputation by the publication of false statements.m.A person privileged to enter or remain on land by virtue of the consent of the lawful possessor.n.A serious crime punishable by death or imprisonment in a penitentiary.o.An intervening event that occurs after the defendant's negligent conduct and relieves him of liability.p.The nontrespassory invasion of another's interest in the private use and enjoyment of his land.q.A crime that is wrong in itself or morally wrong, such as murder.r.The intentional infliction of harmful or offensive bodily contact.s.Immunity from tort liability.t.Conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm.u.A plaintiff's express or implied consent to encounter a known danger.v.Intentional exercise of dominion or control over another's personal property.w.A federal statute intended to stop organized crime from infiltrating legitimate businesses.x.A hearing at which the accused is informed of the crime against him and he enters a plea.y.Rule that permits the jury to infer both negligent conduct and causation. -privilege

In which of the following situations would a court be likely to find an affirmative duty to act?

Match each statement with the correct term below.a.Mental fault; the mental element of a crime.b.A person who enters or remains on the land of another without permission or privilege to do so.c.The nonmental elements of a crime, including the wrongful, physical act.d.Unauthorized use of a person's name or likeness for his own benefit.e.Liability for nonintentional and nonnegligent conduct.f.The duty of care required to avoid being negligent; fictitious individual who is always careful, diligent, and prudent.g.The provision in the Constitution stating that within its sphere, federal law in conformity with the Constitution is supreme, and in cases of conflict, state law must yield.h.A defense to a crime that arises when a law enforcement official induces a person to commit a crime when that person would not have done so otherwise.i.Publication of false statements resulting in harm to another's business or monetary interest.j.The crime of fraudulently taking the property of another by one who was in lawful possession of the property.k.The crime of entering a building with intent to commit a felony.l.Injury to a person's reputation by the publication of false statements.m.A person privileged to enter or remain on land by virtue of the consent of the lawful possessor.n.A serious crime punishable by death or imprisonment in a penitentiary.o.An intervening event that occurs after the defendant's negligent conduct and relieves him of liability.p.The nontrespassory invasion of another's interest in the private use and enjoyment of his land.q.A crime that is wrong in itself or morally wrong, such as murder.r.The intentional infliction of harmful or offensive bodily contact.s.Immunity from tort liability.t.Conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm.u.A plaintiff's express or implied consent to encounter a known danger.v.Intentional exercise of dominion or control over another's personal property.w.A federal statute intended to stop organized crime from infiltrating legitimate businesses.x.A hearing at which the accused is informed of the crime against him and he enters a plea.y.Rule that permits the jury to infer both negligent conduct and causation. -defamation

The reasonable person standard is:

As a general rule:

Match each statement with the correct term below.a.Mental fault; the mental element of a crime.b.A person who enters or remains on the land of another without permission or privilege to do so.c.The nonmental elements of a crime, including the wrongful, physical act.d.Unauthorized use of a person's name or likeness for his own benefit.e.Liability for nonintentional and nonnegligent conduct.f.The duty of care required to avoid being negligent; fictitious individual who is always careful, diligent, and prudent.g.The provision in the Constitution stating that within its sphere, federal law in conformity with the Constitution is supreme, and in cases of conflict, state law must yield.h.A defense to a crime that arises when a law enforcement official induces a person to commit a crime when that person would not have done so otherwise.i.Publication of false statements resulting in harm to another's business or monetary interest.j.The crime of fraudulently taking the property of another by one who was in lawful possession of the property.k.The crime of entering a building with intent to commit a felony.l.Injury to a person's reputation by the publication of false statements.m.A person privileged to enter or remain on land by virtue of the consent of the lawful possessor.n.A serious crime punishable by death or imprisonment in a penitentiary.o.An intervening event that occurs after the defendant's negligent conduct and relieves him of liability.p.The nontrespassory invasion of another's interest in the private use and enjoyment of his land.q.A crime that is wrong in itself or morally wrong, such as murder.r.The intentional infliction of harmful or offensive bodily contact.s.Immunity from tort liability.t.Conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm.u.A plaintiff's express or implied consent to encounter a known danger.v.Intentional exercise of dominion or control over another's personal property.w.A federal statute intended to stop organized crime from infiltrating legitimate businesses.x.A hearing at which the accused is informed of the crime against him and he enters a plea.y.Rule that permits the jury to infer both negligent conduct and causation. -entrapment

Match each statement with the correct term below.a.Mental fault; the mental element of a crime.b.A person who enters or remains on the land of another without permission or privilege to do so.c.The nonmental elements of a crime, including the wrongful, physical act.d.Unauthorized use of a person's name or likeness for his own benefit.e.Liability for nonintentional and nonnegligent conduct.f.The duty of care required to avoid being negligent; fictitious individual who is always careful, diligent, and prudent.g.The provision in the Constitution stating that within its sphere, federal law in conformity with the Constitution is supreme, and in cases of conflict, state law must yield.h.A defense to a crime that arises when a law enforcement official induces a person to commit a crime when that person would not have done so otherwise.i.Publication of false statements resulting in harm to another's business or monetary interest.j.The crime of fraudulently taking the property of another by one who was in lawful possession of the property.k.The crime of entering a building with intent to commit a felony.l.Injury to a person's reputation by the publication of false statements.m.A person privileged to enter or remain on land by virtue of the consent of the lawful possessor.n.A serious crime punishable by death or imprisonment in a penitentiary.o.An intervening event that occurs after the defendant's negligent conduct and relieves him of liability.p.The nontrespassory invasion of another's interest in the private use and enjoyment of his land.q.A crime that is wrong in itself or morally wrong, such as murder.r.The intentional infliction of harmful or offensive bodily contact.s.Immunity from tort liability.t.Conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm.u.A plaintiff's express or implied consent to encounter a known danger.v.Intentional exercise of dominion or control over another's personal property.w.A federal statute intended to stop organized crime from infiltrating legitimate businesses.x.A hearing at which the accused is informed of the crime against him and he enters a plea.y.Rule that permits the jury to infer both negligent conduct and causation. -strict liability

The harshness of the contributory negligence doctrine has been mitigated by:

MATCHING Part II Matching Match each statement with the correct term below.a.Branch of public law created by agencies in the form of rules, regulations, orders, and decisions to carry out regulatory powers and duties.b.Part of private law dealing with rights and duties of individuals among themselves.c.A system of law based upon Roman law which depends upon comprehensive legislative enactments and the inquisitorial system of determining disputes.d.A system of law first developed in England that relies on the judiciary as a source of law and on the adversary system for settling disputes.e.Theory that actions must be judged by their motives and means as well as their results.f.The law establishing duties which, if violated, constitute a wrong against the entire community.g.Theory that society's rewards should be distributed based on market outcomes.h.A body of law based upon principles distinct from common law and providing remedies not available at law.i.A court order requiring a party to do or to refrain from doing a specified act.j.A general legal principle formulated by equity courts.k.Part of substantive law governing relationships among individuals and legal entities.l.Rules for enforcing rights.m.The law dealing with the relationship between government and individuals.n.Party bringing a civil action.o.An equitable remedy invalidating a contract by setting it aside.p.Theory that moral actions are those that produce the greatest net pleasure compared with net pain.q.A court order directing a party to perform a contractual duty.r.The principle found in common law systems that requires courts to apply rules decided in prior cases in deciding substantially similar cases.s.Basic law that creates rights and duties.t.Theory that actions must be judged by what individuals subjectively feel is right or wrong for themselves. -injunction

Assume you are the judge in the Palsgraf case. a.Analyze the fact situation in terms of the elements that need to be proved in a negligence case. b.Why did Mrs.Palsgraf lose the case? What in the fact situation makes it difficult to establish a prima facie case of negligence?

The general rule for the standard of care used in tort law is: a person is under a duty to all others at all times to exercise reasonable care for the safety of other persons and their property.

If negligence of the plaintiff and negligence of the defendant proximately caused the injury and damage sustained by the plaintiff, the plaintiff can recover some damages in those states where contributory negligence is still recognized.

A person who negligently places another person in imminent danger is not liable for injury sustained by a third-party rescuer.

Chris was driving a car with defective brakes very slowly down Fifth Avenue looking for a parking place.Mindy jumped out into the street five feet in front of his car.Chris could not help but hit her.What is Chris's best defense to the charge of negligence?