Exam 8: Intention to Create Legal Relations

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Which of the following is NOT one of the possibilities identified by the High Court in Masters v Cameron (1954)91 CLR 353?

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(78)
Correct Answer:
Verified

B

In which type of agreement is the onus on the defendant to show that legal relations were not intended?

Free
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(98)
Correct Answer:
Verified

C

In Shortall v White [2007] NSWCA 272 the presumption against intention was rebutted because:

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(66)
Correct Answer:
Verified

A

By its nature,a commercial contract can only be intended as legally binding by the parties.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(93)

The intention of the advertiser should be properly reflected in the advertisement.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(82)

The existence or an intention to create a legally binding agreement is a question of law.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(78)

Describe the purpose of a letter of comfort.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(78)

Which of the following would best describe the decision in the case of Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysian Mining Corporation [1988] 1 WLR 799?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(73)

By including the wording 'this agreement is subject to contract' it is clear that the parties do not yet intend to be legally bound to a contract.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(78)

A subjective test is used to determine the state of minds of the parties.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(73)

In commercial agreements,the courts presume that the parties did intend to create legal relations.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(78)

In relation to the question of whether the parties could be objectively seen to intend to create legal relations,the courts take into account a number of factors.What are those factors?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(81)

When a business advertises their product,the courts generally presume that:

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(76)

What is the courts' rationale for presuming that agreements made between family members are not intended to be legally binding? Is this a fair presumption?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(84)

In Darmanin v Cowan [2010] NSWSC 1118 the court found that the parties did not intend to be legally bound because:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(94)

Why did the decision in Banque Brussels Lambert SA v ANI Ltd (1989)21 NSWLR 502 differ from the decision in Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysian Mining Corporation [1988] 1 WLR 799?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(83)

In which of the following cases did the court decide that a gentleman's alleged promises to his mistress were not contractually binding?

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(80)

The decision in Jones v Vernon Pools Ltd [1938] All ER 626 was based on the fact that:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(71)

A volunteer worker may not be covered for workers compensation because:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(82)

In determining whether the parties to an agreement intended to form a contract,why do the courts so often rely upon legal presumptions?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(93)
Showing 1 - 20 of 37
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)