Exam 7: Business Torts and Product Liability
Exam 1: Todays Business Environment: Law and Ethics327 Questions
Exam 2: The Court Systems431 Questions
Exam 3: Trials and Resolving Disputes509 Questions
Exam 4: The Constitution: Focus on Application to Business445 Questions
Exam 5: Criminal Law and Business321 Questions
Exam 6: Elements of Torts465 Questions
Exam 7: Business Torts and Product Liability361 Questions
Exam 8: Real and Personal Property287 Questions
Exam 9: Intellectual Property407 Questions
Exam 10: Contracts584 Questions
Exam 11: Domestic and International Sales424 Questions
Exam 12: Business Organizations459 Questions
Exam 13: Negotiable Instruments, Credit, and Bankruptcy535 Questions
Exam 14: Agency and the Employment Relationship416 Questions
Exam 15: Employment and Labor Regulations539 Questions
Exam 16: Employment Discrimination466 Questions
Exam 17: The Regulatory Process349 Questions
Exam 18: Securities Regulation449 Questions
Exam 19: Consumer Protection483 Questions
Exam 20: Antitrust Law439 Questions
Exam 21: Environmental Law498 Questions
Exam 22: The International Legal Environment of Business338 Questions
Select questions type
The Restatement (Third) of Torts on product defect recommends that the distinction between strict liability and negligence be given less attention.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(59)
The Supreme Court of California in Greenman v. Yuba Power led in adopting a general rule:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(87)
When considering the risk-utility balance, courts consider:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(78)
Which of the following is a potential statutory limit on potential tort liability:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(68)
In one appeals court case it was held to be a design defect to make an emergency stop button red as that color is attractive to children who push the button.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(74)
As seen in Baxter v. Ford Motor, where Baxter lost an eye because the glass in his car windshield was not shatterproof as Ford had claimed, ____ may be the basis for strict liability in tort.
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(83)
Dangers that were not known or not fully appreciated at the time the product was manufactured are known as ____ and account for the largest dollar volume and greatest number of product liability cases.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(90)
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. introduced the rule of strict liability in tort for consumer products.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(67)
One who by experience and expertise is aware of the possible health hazards associated with the use of a product and who has an obligation to inform its employees and customers of potential hazards is referred to as a(n):
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(71)
The rule requiring producers to pay compensation to consumers injured by defective products, even though reasonable care has been exercised, is called:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(73)
The tort system in the U.S. is estimated to cost right about $40 billion per year.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(64)
The doctrine of strict liability has been extended to include cases where manufacturers produce a poorly designed product.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(78)
"No Gordo" is a common artificial sweetener. Researchers find it is responsible for cancer of the liver in some people. A person with liver cancer, who has eaten products containing "No Gordo" for years, wants to sue manufacturers who used the sweetener. In this case:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(86)
One evening you eat at the salad bar of a restaurant. The potato salad looks a bit odd, but you stuff it down anyway. You get food poisoning from the salad, which was left at room temperature too long. If you sue the restaurant, they are likely to be:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(72)
The rule of negligence in tort holds the producer responsible for any defect that is the proximate cause of an injury suffered by the user of the product.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(90)
In Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, where Greenman was injured when a tool his wife bought him malfunctioned, the California high court stated the reason why strict liability should be applied to manufactures of defective products. The reason is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(96)
In Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Greenman was injured when a tool his wife bought him malfunctioned. The Supreme Court of California imposed liability based on:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(84)
The ____ relieves a manufacturer of liability for failing to warn of a product's characteristics or dangers when "the end user knows or reasonably should know of a product's dangers"
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(82)
Showing 321 - 340 of 361
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)