Exam 4: The Royal Prerogative
Which of the following, according to Blackstone's definition, is not a prerogative power which relates to domestic affairs?
B
The ancient right of the Monarch to sturgeon and swans still exists.
True
What would the advantages and disadvantages be of formalising Royal Prerogative powers on a statutory basis?
Formalising Royal Prerogative powers on a statutory basis would have several advantages. Firstly, it would bring greater transparency and accountability to the exercise of these powers. Currently, Royal Prerogative powers are exercised at the discretion of the monarch or the government, without clear legal guidelines. By formalising these powers in statute, there would be a clear framework for their use, making it easier to hold those in power accountable for their decisions.
Secondly, formalising Royal Prerogative powers on a statutory basis would provide greater legal certainty. As these powers are currently based on historical precedent and common law, there is often ambiguity about their scope and limitations. Statutory codification would provide a clear and definitive statement of the powers and their boundaries.
However, there are also potential disadvantages to formalising Royal Prerogative powers on a statutory basis. One concern is that it could limit the flexibility and discretion of the government in certain areas. Royal Prerogative powers are often used in matters of national security and foreign affairs, where quick and decisive action may be necessary. Statutory limitations could hinder the government's ability to respond effectively to rapidly evolving situations.
Additionally, formalising Royal Prerogative powers in statute could politicise these powers. Currently, they are seen as inherent to the Crown and are exercised by the government on its behalf. If these powers were enshrined in statute, they could become subject to partisan debate and potential manipulation for political gain.
In conclusion, formalising Royal Prerogative powers on a statutory basis would bring greater transparency and legal certainty, but it could also limit flexibility and politicise these powers. Any decision to formalise these powers would need to carefully weigh these advantages and disadvantages.
The case of R v Foreign Secretary ex parte Everett (1989) laid down which principle:
In relation to the treaty-making powers in the UK, which of the following are TRUE?
The struggle between the Monarch and Parliament came to a head in 1629 when King Charles II suspended Parliament.
Prerogative powers are fully defined by the UK's unwritten constitution.
In the GCHQ case (1985) which of the following prerogative powers were found to be non-justiciable?
According to constitutional theory, the Monarch has the power to appoint whoever he or she wishes to the office of Prime Minister.
Explain the principles relating to judicial control of the Royal Prerogative laid down by the case of R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Northumbria Police Authority (1988)
Before 1688 which body held powers to make law, regulate trade, raise taxes and defend the realm?
Explain whether or not the courts have the power to review the prerogative of mercy.
The Fixed Term Parliament Act 2011 states that a parliamentary period should be fixed for how many years?
Which of the following honours can be conferred personally by the Monarch?
Outline, with reference to case law, the extent to which the courts can control the use of the Royal Prerogative.
Prior to 1688 the Monarch's duty to protect the realm included the right to build which of the following?
Evaluate the extent to which the royal prerogative can be subject to political control.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)