Exam 8: Specialized Searches Without a Warrant: Vehicles, Dogs, and Technology

The Court has held that there is no violation of the Fourth Amendment when officers wear a small microphone and antenna concealed in an overcoat to allow a second officer stationed outside with a radio receiver to over hear the conversation, so long as:

When obtaining a judicial order for a wiretap, only one of the suspects whose conversations are to be overheard must be named in the judicial order.

The case of Katz v. United States dealt with searches using thermal imaging.

It is not uncommon for drug transports to use certain types of vehicles to disguise their activities.

Many of the cases relating to computers are not really computer cases.

Police cannot record a conversation between two parties under any situation.

The use of GPS devices first came to the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Karo.

If an officer is using a recorder or microphone, that officer is by nature utilizing a(n) _______________.

In the 1983 case of United States v. Knotts, the use what technology in a search came to the U.S. Supreme Court?

Which of the following is a requirement that must be met for electronic eavesdropping required by the Court in Berger v. New York?