Exam 2: Building Ethics at the Individual Level
When a person can blame the misreporting of sales figures for a quarter because the boss wanted the behavior, this is called a (n)
D
The use of morally neutral language to make something seem less immoral refers to:
A
You have been asked to decide whether you should close a plant or not. Discuss how you would apply utilitarian ethics to make the decision. How would use of Kantian ethics help you make the decision?
When deciding whether to close a plant or not, applying utilitarian ethics would involve considering the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This means weighing the potential consequences of closing the plant, such as job loss for employees and economic impact on the community, against the potential benefits, such as reducing environmental harm or improving overall company profitability. By conducting a cost-benefit analysis and considering the overall impact on all stakeholders, a decision can be made based on maximizing the overall well-being of those affected.
On the other hand, using Kantian ethics to make the decision would involve considering the moral duty and principles involved. Kantian ethics focuses on the concept of treating others as ends in themselves, rather than as a means to an end. This means considering the inherent dignity and rights of the employees and community members affected by the decision to close the plant. It would also involve evaluating the decision based on universal moral principles, such as honesty, fairness, and respect for human dignity.
Ultimately, both utilitarian and Kantian ethics can provide valuable frameworks for making the decision to close a plant. Utilitarian ethics can help weigh the overall consequences and benefits, while Kantian ethics can help ensure that the decision is made with respect for the inherent value and rights of all individuals involved. By considering both perspectives, a more well-rounded and ethical decision can be reached.
According to Banaji et al. (2003), in-group favoritism occurs because people tend to favor those individuals who share similar
Discuss Kohlberg's six stages of moral reasoning. How can companies use Kohlberg's stages of moral reasoning to help its employees make more ethical decisions?
When tabacco executive deny the link between smoking and cancer despite decades of evidence suggesting a link, this is called:
When people tend to make associations between employee characteristics and organizational outcomes that may not be accurate, this is called
… refers to the cognitive framework individuals prefer to use in moral decision making
When a manager may turn overlooks a salesperson filing a fraudulent expense claim because the salesperson is one of the best performers in the company, he or she is engaging in which of the following?
What is moral disengagement? Briefly discuss each of the 8 elements of moral disengagement.
When individuals justify certain actions to make them seem more morally acceptable.
… refers to the ability of individuals to access and interpret the moral context of information and stimuli they are presented with
Moral intensity is dependent on how many different elements?
When the decision maker ascribes the fault for the decision to the target, this is called
This occur when the "most well-meaning person unwittingly allows unconscious thoughts and feelings to influence seemingly objective decisions"
When employees justify unethical behavior as orders that came from their managers, they are refering to?
…refers to the ability of an individual to understand the ethicality of a situation or behavior
When a customer returns a used product by justifying that the unethical behavior will clearly not impact the large company from which the product was purchased, this called a (n)
… is defined as any actions that violate accepted societal norms.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)