Exam 5: Corporations
Explain the relevance of the concept of a promissory relationship to the debate over corporate social responsibility.
The concept of a promissory relationship is highly relevant to the debate over corporate social responsibility (CSR) because it highlights the ethical and moral obligations that corporations have towards their stakeholders. A promissory relationship implies that one party has made a promise or commitment to another, and as a result, they have a duty to fulfill that promise.
In the context of CSR, corporations have a promissory relationship with various stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the community at large. These stakeholders rely on the corporation to act in a socially responsible manner, and in doing so, the corporation is essentially making a promise to uphold certain ethical standards and contribute positively to society.
The debate over CSR often revolves around whether corporations have a moral obligation to go beyond simply maximizing profits and consider the impact of their actions on society and the environment. Proponents of CSR argue that corporations have a promissory relationship with their stakeholders and therefore have a duty to act in a socially responsible manner. This includes considerations such as ethical business practices, environmental sustainability, and social impact.
On the other hand, critics of CSR may argue that corporations are primarily responsible for generating profits for their shareholders and that any additional social or environmental initiatives are not a part of their core obligations. However, the concept of a promissory relationship challenges this perspective by emphasizing the moral and ethical commitments that corporations have towards their stakeholders.
Ultimately, the concept of a promissory relationship adds an important ethical dimension to the debate over CSR, highlighting the responsibilities that corporations have towards their stakeholders and the broader society. It underscores the idea that corporations have a duty to fulfill their promises to act in a socially responsible manner, and that this should be a fundamental consideration in discussions about corporate social responsibility.
Recent studies have shown that neither corporate moral codes nor corporate culture affect whether individuals inside the corporation behave morally or immorally.
False
The narrow view of corporate social responsibility argues companies must make money within the "rules of the game" which rules out all of the following except for:
B
According to Keith Davis, in addition to considering potential profitability, a business must weigh the long-range social costs of its activities as well. Only if the overall benefit to society is positive should business act.
Externalities are the intended negative (or in some cases positive) consequences that two parties purposefully impose on an external third party.
According to John Kenneth Galbraith, business's social role is purely economic and corporations should not be considered moral agents.
The idea that corporations will impose their values on us supports one of the arguments for the narrow view of corporate social responsibility.
Corporate internal decision (CID) structures amount to established procedures for accomplishing specific goals.
Is Levi Strauss really hurting the people of Costa Rica by opening the operation there? List the pros and cons.
One of the three important "limits to what the law can do" discussed by Christopher Stone is
In his essay "Social Responsibility and Economic Efficiency," Kenneth Arrow has argued that ethical behavior in the business world comes only at the expense of economic efficiency.
Legally a corporation is a thing that can endure beyond the natural lives of its members and that has incorporators who may sue and be sued as a unit and who are able to consign part of their property to the corporation for ventures of limited liability.
Milton Friedman's perspective is that the only responsibility of a business is to
The courts and the general public find corporate responsibility
The business-can't-handle-it argument is an argument in favor of a broad view of corporate responsibility.
What is a corporation (or limited-liability company) and how does it differ from partnerships and other forms of business association? What are the different kinds of corporations?
Kenneth Arrow discussed two important situations in which profit maximization can be socially inefficient. One of these occurs when
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)