Exam 10: Models of Good Research
Write a memo that identifies your insights into how to conduct your study based on your critique of related research
To: Research Team
From: [Your Name]
Date: [Today's Date]
Subject: Insights for Conducting Our Study Based on Critique of Related Research
After reviewing the related research in our field, I have identified several insights that will guide our approach to conducting our study.
First, it is clear that there is a gap in the literature regarding [specific aspect of the topic]. This presents an opportunity for us to contribute new knowledge in this area.
Second, the methodologies used in the previous studies varied widely, and some were more effective than others. We should carefully consider the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and select the most appropriate methodology for our study.
Third, the sample sizes in the previous studies were relatively small, which may have limited the generalizability of their findings. We should aim for a larger and more diverse sample to ensure that our results are applicable to a broader population.
Fourth, the theoretical frameworks used in the previous studies provided valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms at play. We should build upon these frameworks and consider how they can inform our own research questions and hypotheses.
Finally, the limitations and unanswered questions from the previous studies highlight areas for further investigation. We should take these into account when designing our study and consider how we can address these gaps in the literature.
Overall, our study should aim to build upon the strengths of the previous research while addressing its limitations. By carefully considering these insights, we can ensure that our study makes a meaningful contribution to the field.
Please let me know if you have any questions or if there are other insights from the related research that you think we should consider. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Create an artwork in a medium that requires accuracy or several steps to produce an outcome, such as printmaking or ceramics. Reflect on how "correctness" in procedures contributes to the success of the work and your own self-confidence. Consider its parallels in your goals for conducting a research study.
Creating an artwork in a medium that requires accuracy or several steps to produce an outcome, such as printmaking or ceramics, can be a challenging but rewarding process. The "correctness" in procedures is essential to the success of the work as it ensures that each step is executed precisely, leading to the desired outcome. This attention to detail not only contributes to the quality of the artwork but also boosts my self-confidence as an artist, knowing that I have followed the correct procedures and produced a high-quality piece.
Similarly, in conducting a research study, the concept of "correctness" in procedures is crucial for achieving reliable and valid results. Following the correct research methodology, accurately collecting and analyzing data, and adhering to ethical guidelines are all essential for the success of the study. Just as in creating artwork, the attention to detail and accuracy in procedures in research contributes to the overall quality and credibility of the study.
In both art and research, the parallel lies in the importance of following the correct procedures to achieve the desired outcome. This not only leads to success in the final product or study but also builds self-confidence in one's abilities as an artist or researcher. It emphasizes the significance of precision and accuracy in the creative and academic processes, ultimately leading to a sense of accomplishment and pride in the work produced.
Based on information presented in the discussion section, how does a reader determine whether the study's conclusions are warranted?
By following the logic of the report, the reader should evaluate whether and how the data supports the hypothesis and matches the findings reported.
Use the model research reports to identify what is missing or needed; write an analysis of the report based on your own critique using the standards.
Write an analysis of a report in your own words using the report standards; share with others. Select one or two reports from the literature related to your own study and write an analysis using the report standards.
Explain "the thin line between success and failure" in conducting a research study and give an example.
Identify at least 5 kinds of information that should be found in the methods section of
a report.
What should you look for in a literature review of a published study?
What are the main differences in how information is presented in the results versus the discussion sections?
What are the 5 basic questions to ask in order to evaluate a research report?
Write an imaginary letter to one of the authors of the research reports you evaluated. Pose questions, gently critique the study, or share your empathy with his/her research purposes and goals.
What is one of the main problems in research reporting that may cause readers to question the credibility of a study?
"Failure" in a research study often relates to limitations that occur as the result of unanticipated events or circumstances beyond the control of the researcher. How can
A researcher best make use of these failures in order to contribute to art therapy knowledge?
Why is some research published even though it may contribute a seemingly insignificant finding or have minor design flaws and limitations?
Reflect on something you accomplished with a certain degree of skill. What made it "good"? To what extent did "the right way of making something" enhance its quality and your own pride of accomplishment? How can this idea be extended to "correct" procedures or rigor in research?
Choose one of the model research reports and summarize its strengths and weaknesses.
Select one or more of the model research reports to critique in a small group discussion, following the report standards. Then apply the same methodology to a research report of your choosing. Justify your analysis using the report standards as your criteria.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)