Exam 3: Tort Law and Product Liability
Wideload, Inc., makes, sells, and leases trucks, trailers, and other moving and hauling equipment for consumer use. Verna files a product liability suit against Wideload, alleging a design defect. In deciding whether to hold the maker liable, the court may consider
D
Logistics Trucking Company operates a fleet of fuel trucks. When one of the trucks is positioned to receive a load of biofuel, it strikes a storage tank owned by Metro Biofuel, Inc. For the cost of repairing the damage to the tank, Metro is most likely to be awarded
A
Dixie, a driver for Express Delivery Company, leaves the truck's motor running in neutral and carelessly forgets to set the parking brake while she makes a delivery. The truck rolls and crashes into a nearby gas station pump, igniting a fire that spreads quickly to a construction site a block away. A burned wall collapses onto a crane, which falls on Fazio, a bystander, and injures him. What must Fazio show to recover damages from Express Delivery?
To recover on the ground of negligence, Fazio must show that Express Delivery owed him a duty of care, that Express Delivery (through Dixie) breached that duty, that Fazio was injured, and that Express Delivery's breach caused that injury.
There is no question that in operating the truck, Dixie was acting on Express Delivery's behalf and that her actions breached the duty of reasonable care necessary to park the truck. Also, Fazio was injured by a crane falling on him, not by his own negligence. Liability turns on whether Fazio can connect Dixie's breach of duty to his injury. Fazio must show that the chain of events was a foreseeable result of Dixie's carelessness. The issue of foreseeability is determined by the test of proximate cause, the connection needed for Fazio's recovery of damages.
Elise, an emergency medical technician renders aid to a participant in Forest & Field Marathon, an athletic event. Regarding a suit by the participant against Elise for negligence, Elise is immune from liability under
An action in strict product liability requires that the product be in a defective condition when the defendant sells it.
River Rock Company makes spas and hot tubs. Sterling files a product liability suit against River Rock, alleging a warning defect in one of its products. In deciding whether to hold the defendant liable, the court may take note that a manufacturer or seller has no duty to warn about risks that are
Unintentionally causing a party to break a contract may constitute wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.
Brady knows that the brakes on his car do not work, but he tells Celia, a potential buyer, that there are no problems with the car. On this assurance, Celia buys the car. On learning the truth, she may sue Brady for
Fifi, a clerk at a Games n' Gamers store, takes a video game player and a selection of new games from the store without permission. Fifi is liable for
Street Bikes, Inc., makes and sells a bicycle to Theo. Street Bikes fails to exercise "due care" to make the bicycle safe, however, and Theo is injured as a result. Street Bikes is most likely liable for
Data Analytics, Inc., and eProducts Corporation market competing software products. Data Analytics launches an advertising campaign claiming that eProducts, instead of testing software before it is marketed, has customers "test" the software by using it. eProducts knows this is not true but begins to lose sales to Data Analytics. On what ground could eProducts sue Data Analytics for injury to eProducts' reputation?
Under the theory of negligence, the duty of care requires an intentional act.
In a digital billboard ad, Mainstream Headwaters falsely accuses Northwest Passages, a competitor, of selling stolen kayaks, canoes, and other boats and boating gear. Northwest's sales decrease. Mainstream has most likely committed
Good Cookin' Products Company makes heat convection ovens. Heidi discovers that her Good Cookin' oven is defective and sues the maker for product liability based on strict liability. To win, Heidi must show that she
Frieda is working on a construction site when she is injured on the job in the collapse of a Girder Company-made ceiling beam. At the time, Frieda is not wearing a hard hat or any other safety gear. In Frieda's product liability suit against Girder, the company can most successfully raise the defense of
After a dinner at Rosario's Italian Eatery, Stephanie believes that she was overcharged and shoves Thom, the waiter. Thom sues Stephanie, alleging that the shove was a battery. Stephanie is liable
A product contains a manufacturing defect when the product departs from its intended design even though all possible care was exercised.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)