Exam 11: Criminal Sexual Conduct, Assault and Battery, Kidnapping, and False Imprisonment

The ______ approach requires the amount of force required to achieve penetration.

As late as 1984, 40 states recognized a marital exemption that provided that a husband could not be held liable for the rape of his wife.

Under common law, ______ describes a situation when one deprives a human being of a member of his or her body, or disables, disfigures, or renders it useless.

The common law defined rape as the forcible carnal knowledge of a woman against her will.

When an individual engaged in sexual activity wishes to stop and his/her partner continues, what criminal charge is appropriate?

Modern battery statutes require some form of physical contact that results in bodily injury or offensive touching.

Battery is confined to the direct application of force by an individual.

Fraud in the factum is not rape.

What is the difference between kidnapping and false imprisonment?

______ is consent to intercourse that results from a misrepresentation as to the purpose or benefits of the sexual act.

All of the following are elements of stalking EXCEPT ______.

A(n) ______ is the application of force to another person.

The ______ approach requires an act of force beyond the physical effort required to accomplish penetration.

All of the following are elements of rape under the common law EXCEPT ______?

Rape shield laws allow the defense to ask the victim about sexual relations other than the accused.

What is the Lindbergh Law?

False imprisonment may overlap with all of the following EXCEPT ______?

Fraud in the inducement is not rape.

In order to protect the rape victim from further humiliation and "victimization" at trial, ______ laws were passed in all states.

Ellen and George had been dating for a few weeks when they decided to have intercourse. After the intercourse, Ellen broke up with George and testified that she had been raped. During the trial, George's defense attorney wanted to bring in evidence that in a previous relationship, Ellen had intercourse with her significant other, then claimed he raped her after breaking up with him. Should the judge allow the jury to hear the evidence? Why or why not?