Exam 13: Multiple Regression

SCENARIO 13-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes, 0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.6391 R Square 0.4085 Adjusted R Square 0.3765 Standard Error 18.8929 Observations 40 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 9119.0897 4559.5448 12.7740 0.0000 Residual 37 13206.8103 356.9408 Total 39 22325.9 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P -value Intercept -0.2143 11.5796 -0.0185 0.9853 Age 1.4448 0.3160 4.5717 0.0000 Manager -22.5761 11.3488 -1.9893 0.0541 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-17, what is the value of the test statistic when testing whether age has any effect on the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff while holding constant the effect of the other independent variable?

SCENARIO 13-10 You worked as an intern at We Always Win Car Insurance Company last summer.You notice that individual car insurance premiums depend very much on the age of the individual and the number of traffic tickets received by the individual.You performed a regression analysis in EXCEL and obtained the following partial information: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.8546 R Square 0.7303 Adjusted R Square 0.6853 Standard Error 226.7502 Observations 15 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 835284.6500 16.2457 0.0004 Residual 12 616987.8200 Total 2287557.1200 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 99\% Upper 99\% Intercept 821.2617 161.9391 5.0714 0.0003 326.6124 1315.9111 Age -1.4061 2.5988 -0.5411 0.5984 -9.3444 6.5321 Tickets 243.4401 43.2470 5.6291 0.0001 111.3406 375.5396 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-10, to test the significance of the multiple regression model, the value of the test statistic is .

SCENARIO 13-10 You worked as an intern at We Always Win Car Insurance Company last summer.You notice that individual car insurance premiums depend very much on the age of the individual and the number of traffic tickets received by the individual.You performed a regression analysis in EXCEL and obtained the following partial information: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.8546 R Square 0.7303 Adjusted R Square 0.6853 Standard Error 226.7502 Observations 15 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 835284.6500 16.2457 0.0004 Residual 12 616987.8200 Total 2287557.1200 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 99\% Upper 99\% Intercept 821.2617 161.9391 5.0714 0.0003 326.6124 1315.9111 Age -1.4061 2.5988 -0.5411 0.5984 -9.3444 6.5321 Tickets 243.4401 43.2470 5.6291 0.0001 111.3406 375.5396 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-10, the multiple regression model is significant at a10% level of significance.

In a multiple regression problem involving two independent variables, if b1 is computed to be+2.0, it means that

SCENARIO 13-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixth- grade proficiency test.She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X1 = Salaries and X 2 = Spending: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.4276 R Square 0.1828 Adjusted R Square 0.1457 Standard Error 5.7351 Observations 47 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 323.8284 161.9142 4.9227 0.0118 Residual 44 1447.2094 32.8911 Total 46 1771.0378 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept -72.9916 45.9106 -1.5899 0.1190 -165.5184 19.5352 Salary 2.7939 0.8974 3.1133 0.0032 0.9853 4.6025 Spending 0.3742 0.9782 0.3825 0.7039 -1.5972 2.3455 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-15, you can conclude definitively that instructional spending per pupil individually has no impact on the mean percentage of students passing the proficiency test, considering the effect of mean teacher salary, at a 1% level of significance based solely on but not actually computing the 99% the confidence interval estimate for $\beta$ 2 .

SCENARIO 13-7 The department head of the accounting department wanted to see if she could predict the GPA of students using the number of course units and total SAT scores of each.She takes a sample of 6 students and generates the following Microsoft Excel output: SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.916 R Square 0.839 Adjusted R Square 0.732 Standard Error 0.24685 Observations 6 ANOVA df SS MS F Signif F Regression 2 0.95219 0.47610 7.813 0.0646 Residual 3 0.18281 0.06094 Total 5 1.13500 Coeff StdError t Stat P -value Intercept 4.593897 1.13374542 4.052 0.0271 Units -0.247270 0.06268485 -3.945 0.0290 Total SAT 0.001443 0.00101241 1.425 0.2494 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-7, the value of the adjusted coefficient of multiple determination,r2adj, is .

SCENARIO 13-7 The department head of the accounting department wanted to see if she could predict the GPA of students using the number of course units and total SAT scores of each.She takes a sample of 6 students and generates the following Microsoft Excel output: SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.916 R Square 0.839 Adjusted R Square 0.732 Standard Error 0.24685 Observations 6 ANOVA df SS MS F Signif F Regression 2 0.95219 0.47610 7.813 0.0646 Residual 3 0.18281 0.06094 Total 5 1.13500 Coeff StdError t Stat P -value Intercept 4.593897 1.13374542 4.052 0.0271 Units -0.247270 0.06268485 -3.945 0.0290 Total SAT 0.001443 0.00101241 1.425 0.2494 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-7, the department head decided to construct a 95% confidence interval for $\beta$ 1 .The confidence interval is from to .

SCENARIO 13-7 The department head of the accounting department wanted to see if she could predict the GPA of students using the number of course units and total SAT scores of each.She takes a sample of 6 students and generates the following Microsoft Excel output: SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.916 R Square 0.839 Adjusted R Square 0.732 Standard Error 0.24685 Observations 6 ANOVA df SS MS F Signif F Regression 2 0.95219 0.47610 7.813 0.0646 Residual 3 0.18281 0.06094 Total 5 1.13500 Coeff StdError t Stat P -value Intercept 4.593897 1.13374542 4.052 0.0271 Units -0.247270 0.06268485 -3.945 0.0290 Total SAT 0.001443 0.00101241 1.425 0.2494 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-7, the department head wants to use a t test to test for the significance of the coefficient of X1.The value of the test statistic is .

SCENARIO 13-19 The marketing manager for a nationally franchised lawn service company would like to study the characteristics that differentiate home owners who do and do not have a lawn service.A random sample of 30 home owners located in a suburban area near a large city was selected; 11 did not have a lawn service (code 0) and 19 had a lawn service (code 1).Additional information available concerning these 30 home owners includes family income (Income, in thousands of dollars) and lawn size (Lawn Size, in thousands of square feet). The PHStat output is given below: Binary Logistic Regression Predictor Coefficients SE Coef Z p -Value Intercept -7.8562 3.8224 -2.0553 0.0398 Income 0.0304 0.0133 2.2897 0.0220 Lawn Size 1.2804 0.6971 1.8368 0.0662 Deviance 25.3089 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-19, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the model is not a good-fitting model at a 0.05 level of significance.

SCENARIO 13-3 An economist is interested to see how consumption for an economy (in $ billions) is influenced by gross domestic product ($ billions) and aggregate price (consumer price index).The Microsoft Excel output of this regression is partially reproduced below. -Referring to SCENARIO 13-3, the p-value for the aggregated price index is

SCENARIO 13-10 You worked as an intern at We Always Win Car Insurance Company last summer.You notice that individual car insurance premiums depend very much on the age of the individual and the number of traffic tickets received by the individual.You performed a regression analysis in EXCEL and obtained the following partial information: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.8546 R Square 0.7303 Adjusted R Square 0.6853 Standard Error 226.7502 Observations 15 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 835284.6500 16.2457 0.0004 Residual 12 616987.8200 Total 2287557.1200 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 99\% Upper 99\% Intercept 821.2617 161.9391 5.0714 0.0003 326.6124 1315.9111 Age -1.4061 2.5988 -0.5411 0.5984 -9.3444 6.5321 Tickets 243.4401 43.2470 5.6291 0.0001 111.3406 375.5396 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-10, the proportion of the total variability in insurance premiums that can be explained by AGE and TICKETS after adjusting for the number of observations and the number independent variables is .

SCENARIO 13-6 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y).To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 2 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit ( X1 ) and the amount of insulation in inches ( X 2 ).Given below is EXCEL output of the regression model. Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.5270 R Square 0.2778 Adjusted R Square 0.1928 Standard Error 40.9107 Observations 20 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 10943.0190 5471.5095 3.2691 0.0629 Residual 17 28452.6027 1673.6825 Total 19 39395.6218 13-22 Multiple Regression Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-volue Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 448.2925 90.7853 4.9379 0.0001 256.7522 639.8328 Temperature -2.7621 1.2371 -2.2327 0.0393 -5.3721 -0.1520 Insulation -15.9408 10.0638 -1.5840 0.1316 -37.1736 5.2919 Also SSR \mid =8343.3572 and SSR \mid =4199.2672 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-6, _% of the variation in heating cost can be explained by the variation in minimum outside temperature while holding the amount of insulation constant.

SCENARIO 13-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes, 0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.6391 R Square 0.4085 Adjusted R Square 0.3765 Standard Error 18.8929 Observations 40 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 9119.0897 4559.5448 12.7740 0.0000 Residual 37 13206.8103 356.9408 Total 39 22325.9 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P -value Intercept -0.2143 11.5796 -0.0185 0.9853 Age 1.4448 0.3160 4.5717 0.0000 Manager -22.5761 11.3488 -1.9893 0.0541 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-17, we can conclude definitively that, holding constant the effect of the other independent variables, there is not a difference in the mean number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff between a worker who is in a management position and one who is not at a 1% level of significance if all we have is the information of the 95% confidence interval estimate for the difference in the mean number ofweeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff between a worker who is in a management position and one who is not.

SCENARIO 13-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes, 0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.6391 R Square 0.4085 Adjusted R Square 0.3765 Standard Error 18.8929 Observations 40 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 9119.0897 4559.5448 12.7740 0.0000 Residual 37 13206.8103 356.9408 Total 39 22325.9 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P -value Intercept -0.2143 11.5796 -0.0185 0.9853 Age 1.4448 0.3160 4.5717 0.0000 Manager -22.5761 11.3488 -1.9893 0.0541 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-17, the null hypothesis H0 : $\beta$ 1 = $\beta$ 2= 0 implies that the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff is not related to any of the explanatory variables.

SCENARIO 13-19 The marketing manager for a nationally franchised lawn service company would like to study the characteristics that differentiate home owners who do and do not have a lawn service.A random sample of 30 home owners located in a suburban area near a large city was selected; 11 did not have a lawn service (code 0) and 19 had a lawn service (code 1).Additional information available concerning these 30 home owners includes family income (Income, in thousands of dollars) and lawn size (Lawn Size, in thousands of square feet). The PHStat output is given below: Binary Logistic Regression Predictor Coefficients SE Coef Z p -Value Intercept -7.8562 3.8224 -2.0553 0.0398 Income 0.0304 0.0133 2.2897 0.0220 Lawn Size 1.2804 0.6971 1.8368 0.0662 Deviance 25.3089 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-19, what is the estimated odds ratio for a home owner with a family income of $100,000 and a lawn size of 5,000 square feet?

SCENARIO 13-6 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y).To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 2 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit ( X1 ) and the amount of insulation in inches ( X 2 ).Given below is EXCEL output of the regression model. Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.5270 R Square 0.2778 Adjusted R Square 0.1928 Standard Error 40.9107 Observations 20 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 10943.0190 5471.5095 3.2691 0.0629 Residual 17 28452.6027 1673.6825 Total 19 39395.6218 13-22 Multiple Regression Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-volue Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept 448.2925 90.7853 4.9379 0.0001 256.7522 639.8328 Temperature -2.7621 1.2371 -2.2327 0.0393 -5.3721 -0.1520 Insulation -15.9408 10.0638 -1.5840 0.1316 -37.1736 5.2919 Also SSR \mid =8343.3572 and SSR \mid =4199.2672 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-6, the value of the partial F test statistic is forH0: Variable X2 does not significantly improve the model after variable X1 has been includedH1: Variable X2 significantly improves the model after variable X1 has been included

SCENARIO 13-18 A logistic regression model was estimated in order to predict the probability that a randomly chosen university or college would be a private university using information on mean total Scholastic Aptitude Test score (SAT) at the university or college and whether the TOEFL criterion is at least 90 (Toefl90 = 1 if yes, 0 otherwise.) The dependent variable, Y, is school type (Type = 1 if private and 0 otherwise).There are 80 universities in the sample. The PHStat output is given below: Binary Logistic Regression Predictor Coefficients SE Coef Z p -Value Intercept -3.9594 1.6741 -2.3650 0.0180 SAT 0.0028 0.0011 2.5459 0.0109 Toefl90:1 0.1928 0.5827 0.3309 0.7407 Deviance 101.9826 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-18, there is not enough evidence to conclude that SAT score makes a significant contribution to the model in the presence of Toefl90 at a 0.05 level of significance.

SCENARIO 13-11 A weight-loss clinic wants to use regression analysis to build a model for weight loss of a client (measured in pounds).Two variables thought to affect weight loss are client's length of time on the weight-loss program and time of session.These variables are described below: Y = Weight loss (in pounds) X1 = Length of time in weight-loss program (in months) X2 = 1 if morning session, 0 if not Data for 25 clients on a weight-loss program at the clinic were collected and used to fit the interaction model: $Y = \beta _ { 0 } + \beta _ { 1 } X _ { 1 } + \beta _ { 2 } X _ { 2 } + \beta _ { 3 } X _ { 1 } X _ { 2 } + \varepsilon$ Output from Microsoft Excel follows: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7308 R Square 0.5341 Adjusted R Square 0.4675 Standard Error 43.3275 Observations 25 $\text { ANOVA }$ df SS MS F Significance F Regression 3 45194.0661 15064.6887 8.0248 0.0009 Residual 21 39422.6542 1877.2692 Total 24 84616.7203 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 99\% Upper 99\% Intercept -20.7298 22.3710 -0.9266 0.3646 -84.0702 42.6106 Length 7.2472 1.4992 4.8340 0.0001 3.0024 11.4919 Morn 90.1981 40.2336 2.2419 0.0359 -23.7176 204.1138 Length x Morn -5.1024 3.3511 -1.5226 0.1428 -14.5905 4.3857 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-11, the overall model for predicting weight loss(Y) is statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

SCENARIO 13-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes, 0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.6391 R Square 0.4085 Adjusted R Square 0.3765 Standard Error 18.8929 Observations 40 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 9119.0897 4559.5448 12.7740 0.0000 Residual 37 13206.8103 356.9408 Total 39 22325.9 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P -value Intercept -0.2143 11.5796 -0.0185 0.9853 Age 1.4448 0.3160 4.5717 0.0000 Manager -22.5761 11.3488 -1.9893 0.0541 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-17, the null hypothesis should be rejected at a 10% level of significance when testing whether there is a significant relationship between the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff and the entire set of explanatory variables.

SCENARIO 13-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixth- grade proficiency test.She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X1 = Salaries and X 2 = Spending: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.4276 R Square 0.1828 Adjusted R Square 0.1457 Standard Error 5.7351 Observations 47 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 323.8284 161.9142 4.9227 0.0118 Residual 44 1447.2094 32.8911 Total 46 1771.0378 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept -72.9916 45.9106 -1.5899 0.1190 -165.5184 19.5352 Salary 2.7939 0.8974 3.1133 0.0032 0.9853 4.6025 Spending 0.3742 0.9782 0.3825 0.7039 -1.5972 2.3455 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-15, what is the standard error of estimate?