Exam 10: Discriminant Analysis

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

If using the regression tool for two-group discriminant analysis, in the regression dialog box, the Input X-Range entry corresponds to

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(80)

Exhibit 10.7 The information below is used for the following questions. An investor wants to classify companies as being a High Risk Investment, Group 1, a Medium Risk Investment, Group 2, or a Low Risk Investment, Group 3. He has gathered Liquidity, Profitability data on 18 companies he has invested in and produced the following spreadsheet. The following Discriminant Analysis output using Risk Solver Platform (RSP) has also been generated.  Exhibit 10.7 The information below is used for the following questions. An investor wants to classify companies as being a High Risk Investment, Group 1, a Medium Risk Investment, Group 2, or a Low Risk Investment, Group 3. He has gathered Liquidity, Profitability data on 18 companies he has invested in and produced the following spreadsheet. The following Discriminant Analysis output using Risk Solver Platform (RSP) has also been generated.     \text {Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \text {6:09:36PM}   \text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are differen}    \text { Group Centroids }    \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 0.913333333 & 0.316666667 \\ 2 & 0.856 & 0.288 \\ 3 & 0728571420 & 023 \end{array}        \text { Group Frequencies }   \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative }\\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & 33.33 \% \\ 2 & 27.78 \% \\ 3 & 38.80 \%  \end{array}      -Refer to Exhibit 10.7. Based on the 18 observations in the model complete the following confusion/classification matrix.   \begin{array}{lllll} \text { Actual } & \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group 2 } & \text { Group } 3 & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Group } 1 & & & \\ \text { Group } 2 & & & \\ \text { Group } 3 & & & \\ \text { Total } & & &\\ \\ \text { \% Correct }&& \end{array}    Discriminant Analysis Report\text {Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad \quad October 3,2010\text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad 6:09:36PM\text {6:09:36PM} Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are differen\text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are differen}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group 1 2 1 0.913333333 0.316666667 2 0.856 0.288 3 0728571420 023  Group Frequencies \text { Group Frequencies } Relative Group Frequency 1 33.33\% 2 27.78\% 3 38.80\%  Exhibit 10.7 The information below is used for the following questions. An investor wants to classify companies as being a High Risk Investment, Group 1, a Medium Risk Investment, Group 2, or a Low Risk Investment, Group 3. He has gathered Liquidity, Profitability data on 18 companies he has invested in and produced the following spreadsheet. The following Discriminant Analysis output using Risk Solver Platform (RSP) has also been generated.     \text {Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \text {6:09:36PM}   \text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are differen}    \text { Group Centroids }    \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 0.913333333 & 0.316666667 \\ 2 & 0.856 & 0.288 \\ 3 & 0728571420 & 023 \end{array}        \text { Group Frequencies }   \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative }\\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & 33.33 \% \\ 2 & 27.78 \% \\ 3 & 38.80 \%  \end{array}      -Refer to Exhibit 10.7. Based on the 18 observations in the model complete the following confusion/classification matrix.   \begin{array}{lllll} \text { Actual } & \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group 2 } & \text { Group } 3 & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Group } 1 & & & \\ \text { Group } 2 & & & \\ \text { Group } 3 & & & \\ \text { Total } & & &\\ \\ \text { \% Correct }&& \end{array}     Exhibit 10.7 The information below is used for the following questions. An investor wants to classify companies as being a High Risk Investment, Group 1, a Medium Risk Investment, Group 2, or a Low Risk Investment, Group 3. He has gathered Liquidity, Profitability data on 18 companies he has invested in and produced the following spreadsheet. The following Discriminant Analysis output using Risk Solver Platform (RSP) has also been generated.     \text {Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \text {6:09:36PM}   \text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are differen}    \text { Group Centroids }    \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 0.913333333 & 0.316666667 \\ 2 & 0.856 & 0.288 \\ 3 & 0728571420 & 023 \end{array}        \text { Group Frequencies }   \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative }\\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & 33.33 \% \\ 2 & 27.78 \% \\ 3 & 38.80 \%  \end{array}      -Refer to Exhibit 10.7. Based on the 18 observations in the model complete the following confusion/classification matrix.   \begin{array}{lllll} \text { Actual } & \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group 2 } & \text { Group } 3 & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Group } 1 & & & \\ \text { Group } 2 & & & \\ \text { Group } 3 & & & \\ \text { Total } & & &\\ \\ \text { \% Correct }&& \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.7. Based on the 18 observations in the model complete the following confusion/classification matrix. Actual Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Total Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Total \% Correct

(Essay)
4.8/5
(71)

Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What percentage of the observations is classified incorrectly?  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What percentage of the observations is classified incorrectly?  Discriminant Analysis Report\text { Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad  October 1,2010 \text { October 1,2010 }\quad  3:05:44 PM\text { 3:05:44 PM}  Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 6107 6057  Classification Matrix \text { Classification Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 10 90.00\% Group2 2 8 10 80.00\% Tnta1 11 0 20 850\%\%  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What percentage of the observations is classified incorrectly? -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What percentage of the observations is classified incorrectly?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(78)

Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. How many observations are classified correctly?  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. How many observations are classified correctly?  Discriminant Analysis Report\text { Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad  October 1,2010 \text { October 1,2010 }\quad  3:05:44 PM\text { 3:05:44 PM}  Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 6107 6057  Classification Matrix \text { Classification Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 10 90.00\% Group2 2 8 10 80.00\% Tnta1 11 0 20 850\%\%  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. How many observations are classified correctly? -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. How many observations are classified correctly?

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(91)

In discriminant analysis the averages for the independent variables for a group define the

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(77)

Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What percentage of the observations is classified correctly?  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What percentage of the observations is classified correctly?  Discriminant Analysis Report\text { Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad  October 1,2010 \text { October 1,2010 }\quad  3:05:44 PM\text { 3:05:44 PM}  Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 6107 6057  Classification Matrix \text { Classification Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 10 90.00\% Group2 2 8 10 80.00\% Tnta1 11 0 20 850\%\%  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What percentage of the observations is classified correctly? -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What percentage of the observations is classified correctly?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(81)

Discriminant analysis (DA) differs from most other predictive statistical methods because the dependent variable is

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(80)

Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What formula is entered in cell F4 of the spreadsheet to compute the Predicted Group for the first student?  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What formula is entered in cell F4 of the spreadsheet to compute the Predicted Group for the first student?  Discriminant Analysis Report\text { Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad  October 1,2010 \text { October 1,2010 }\quad  3:05:44 PM\text { 3:05:44 PM}  Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 6107 6057  Classification Matrix \text { Classification Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 10 90.00\% Group2 2 8 10 80.00\% Tnta1 11 0 20 850\%\%  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What formula is entered in cell F4 of the spreadsheet to compute the Predicted Group for the first student? -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What formula is entered in cell F4 of the spreadsheet to compute the Predicted Group for the first student?

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(87)

Refer to Exhibit 10.3. What is the percentage of observations: a. Correctly classified to a Group? b. Incorrectly classified to a Group? c. Correctly classified to Group 1? d. Correctly classified to Group 2? ANS: a. 94.44% b. 5.56% c. 90% d. 100% PTS: 1 Exhibit 10.4 The information below is used for the following questions. A manager wants to classify people as belonging to one of two groups based on two scores. The manager has collected data on four current employees and has performed a regression analysis on the data. The data for the problem and the relevant output are shown below.  Regression Statistics \text { Regression Statistics } Coefficients Intercept 31.8158 Score 1 -0.14956 Score 2 0.03825  Refer to Exhibit 10.3. What is the percentage of observations: a. Correctly classified to a Group? b. Incorrectly classified to a Group? c. Correctly classified to Group 1? d. Correctly classified to Group 2? ANS: a. 94.44% b. 5.56% c. 90% d. 100% PTS: 1 Exhibit 10.4 The information below is used for the following questions. A manager wants to classify people as belonging to one of two groups based on two scores. The manager has collected data on four current employees and has performed a regression analysis on the data. The data for the problem and the relevant output are shown below.   \text { Regression Statistics }   \begin{array}{|l|r|} \hline & \text { Coefficients } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 31.8158 \\ \hline \text { Score 1 } & -0.14956 \\ \hline \text { Score 2 } & 0.03825 \\ \hline \end{array}      \text {Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \quad    \text {5:50:10 PM}   \text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different }    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 241.85 & 144.2 \\ 2 & 236.8 & 1422 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }    \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative } \\ \text { Group } &\text { Frequency }\\ \hline 1 & 50.00 \%\\ 2&50.00\% \end{array}    \text {Training Sample Classification}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {Mahalanobis Distances}   \begin{array}{crrcc} &&&\text { Predicted }&\text { Actual }\\ \text { Observation } & \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Group } & \text { Group } \\ \hline 1 & 0.5 & 1.64085 \mathrm{E}+18 & 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 0.5 & 1.6759 \mathrm{E}+17 & 1 & 1 \\ 3 & 2.09579 \mathrm{E}+16 & 0.5 & 2 & 2 \\ 4 & 750135 \mathrm{~F}+14 & 05 & 2 & 2 \end{array}    \text {Classification Matrix}    \begin{array}{lcccr} \text { Actual/}\\ \text { Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 2 & 0 & 2 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 0 & 2 & 2 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Total} & 2 & 2 & 4 & 100.00 \% \end{array}     \text {Test Sample Classification}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {Mahalanobis Distances}   \begin{array}{crrcc} &&&\text { Predicted }&\\ \text { Observation } & \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Group } \\ \hline 1 & 0.5 & 1.64085 \mathrm{E}+18 & 1  \\ 2 & 0.5 & 1.6759 \mathrm{E}+17 & 1  \\ 3 & 2.09579 \mathrm{E}+16 & 0.5 & 2  \\ 4 & 750135 \mathrm{~F}+14 & 05 & 2  \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.4. Compute the discriminant score and predicted group for someone with Score 1 of 238 and Score 2 of 140. Discriminant Analysis Report\text {Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad October 3,2010\text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \quad 5:50:10 PM\text {5:50:10 PM} Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group 1 2 1 241.85 144.2 2 236.8 1422  Group Frequencies \text { Group Frequencies } Relative Group Frequency 1 50.00\% 2 50.00\% Training Sample Classification\text {Training Sample Classification} \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Mahalanobis Distances\text {Mahalanobis Distances} Predicted Actual Observation Group 1 Group2 Group Group 1 0.5 1.64085+18 1 1 2 0.5 1.6759+17 1 1 3 2.09579+16 0.5 2 2 4 750135+14 05 2 2 Classification Matrix\text {Classification Matrix} Actual/ Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 2 0 2 100.00\% Group2 0 2 2 100.00\% Total 2 2 4 100.00\% Test Sample Classification\text {Test Sample Classification} \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Mahalanobis Distances\text {Mahalanobis Distances} Predicted Observation Group 1 Group2 Group 1 0.5 1.64085+18 1 2 0.5 1.6759+17 1 3 2.09579+16 0.5 2 4 750135+14 05 2 -Refer to Exhibit 10.4. Compute the discriminant score and predicted group for someone with Score 1 of 238 and Score 2 of 140.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(77)

Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What is the straight line distance between (6,4) and (2,9)?  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What is the straight line distance between (6,4) and (2,9)?  Discriminant Analysis Report\text { Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad  October 1,2010 \text { October 1,2010 }\quad  3:05:44 PM\text { 3:05:44 PM}  Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 6107 6057  Classification Matrix \text { Classification Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 10 90.00\% Group2 2 8 10 80.00\% Tnta1 11 0 20 850\%\%  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What is the straight line distance between (6,4) and (2,9)? -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What is the straight line distance between (6,4) and (2,9)?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(72)

Which of the following statements is true concerning multiple discriminant analysis distance measures?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(71)

Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. The straight line distance between two points (X<sub>1</sub>, Y<sub>1</sub>) and (X<sub>2</sub>, Y<sub>2</sub>) is calculated as  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. The straight line distance between two points (X<sub>1</sub>, Y<sub>1</sub>) and (X<sub>2</sub>, Y<sub>2</sub>) is calculated as  Discriminant Analysis Report\text { Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad  October 1,2010 \text { October 1,2010 }\quad  3:05:44 PM\text { 3:05:44 PM}  Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 6107 6057  Classification Matrix \text { Classification Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 10 90.00\% Group2 2 8 10 80.00\% Tnta1 11 0 20 850\%\%  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. The straight line distance between two points (X<sub>1</sub>, Y<sub>1</sub>) and (X<sub>2</sub>, Y<sub>2</sub>) is calculated as -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. The straight line distance between two points (X1, Y1) and (X2, Y2) is calculated as

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(90)

Exhibit 10.2 The following questions are based on the problem description, spreadsheet, and the Risk Solver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful (Group 1), marginally successful (Group 2) or not-successful (Group 3) in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, 7 successful (Group 1), 6 marginally successful (Group 2) and 7 not successful (Group 3).  Exhibit 10.2 The following questions are based on the problem description, spreadsheet, and the Risk Solver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful (Group 1), marginally successful (Group 2) or not-successful (Group 3) in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, 7 successful (Group 1), 6 marginally successful (Group 2) and 7 not successful (Group 3).     \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 4:22:38 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline1 & 697.7142857 & 650.4285714 \\ 2 & 647.8571429 & 630.7142857 \\  3 & 5876666667 & 6051666667 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }   \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative }\\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & 35.00 \% \\ 2 & 35.00 \% \\ 3 & 3000 \% \end{array}     \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lccccr} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Group3 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 6 & 1 & 0 & 7 & 85.71 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 0 & 7 & 0 & 7 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Group3 } & 0 & 0 & 6 & 6 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Total } & 6 & 8 & 6 & 20&95.00\% \end{array}   -Refer to Exhibit 10.2. What is the quantitative test score value of the group centroid for group 2?  Discriminant Analysis Report\text { Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad  October 1,2010 \text { October 1,2010 }\quad  4:22:38 PM\text { 4:22:38 PM}  Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group Quantitative Verbal 1 697.7142857 650.4285714 2 647.8571429 630.7142857 3 5876666667 6051666667  Group Frequencies \text { Group Frequencies } Relative Group Frequency 1 35.00\% 2 35.00\% 3 3000\%  Exhibit 10.2 The following questions are based on the problem description, spreadsheet, and the Risk Solver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful (Group 1), marginally successful (Group 2) or not-successful (Group 3) in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, 7 successful (Group 1), 6 marginally successful (Group 2) and 7 not successful (Group 3).     \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 4:22:38 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline1 & 697.7142857 & 650.4285714 \\ 2 & 647.8571429 & 630.7142857 \\  3 & 5876666667 & 6051666667 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }   \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative }\\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & 35.00 \% \\ 2 & 35.00 \% \\ 3 & 3000 \% \end{array}     \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lccccr} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Group3 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 6 & 1 & 0 & 7 & 85.71 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 0 & 7 & 0 & 7 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Group3 } & 0 & 0 & 6 & 6 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Total } & 6 & 8 & 6 & 20&95.00\% \end{array}   -Refer to Exhibit 10.2. What is the quantitative test score value of the group centroid for group 2?  Classification Matrix \text { Classification Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Group3 Total \% correct Group1 6 1 0 7 85.71\% Group2 0 7 0 7 100.00\% Group3 0 0 6 6 100.00\% Total 6 8 6 20 95.00\% -Refer to Exhibit 10.2. What is the quantitative test score value of the group centroid for group 2?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(90)

Refer to Exhibit 10.3. What is the percentage of observations: a. Correctly classified to a Group? b. Incorrectly classified to a Group? c. Correctly classified to Group 1? d. Correctly classified to Group 2? ANS: a. 94.44% b. 5.56% c. 90% d. 100% PTS: 1 Exhibit 10.4 The information below is used for the following questions. A manager wants to classify people as belonging to one of two groups based on two scores. The manager has collected data on four current employees and has performed a regression analysis on the data. The data for the problem and the relevant output are shown below.  Regression Statistics \text { Regression Statistics } Coefficients Intercept 31.8158 Score 1 -0.14956 Score 2 0.03825  Refer to Exhibit 10.3. What is the percentage of observations: a. Correctly classified to a Group? b. Incorrectly classified to a Group? c. Correctly classified to Group 1? d. Correctly classified to Group 2? ANS: a. 94.44% b. 5.56% c. 90% d. 100% PTS: 1 Exhibit 10.4 The information below is used for the following questions. A manager wants to classify people as belonging to one of two groups based on two scores. The manager has collected data on four current employees and has performed a regression analysis on the data. The data for the problem and the relevant output are shown below.   \text { Regression Statistics }   \begin{array}{|l|r|} \hline & \text { Coefficients } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 31.8158 \\ \hline \text { Score 1 } & -0.14956 \\ \hline \text { Score 2 } & 0.03825 \\ \hline \end{array}      \text {Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \quad    \text {5:50:10 PM}   \text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different }    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 241.85 & 144.2 \\ 2 & 236.8 & 1422 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }    \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative } \\ \text { Group } &\text { Frequency }\\ \hline 1 & 50.00 \%\\ 2&50.00\% \end{array}    \text {Training Sample Classification}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {Mahalanobis Distances}   \begin{array}{crrcc} &&&\text { Predicted }&\text { Actual }\\ \text { Observation } & \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Group } & \text { Group } \\ \hline 1 & 0.5 & 1.64085 \mathrm{E}+18 & 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 0.5 & 1.6759 \mathrm{E}+17 & 1 & 1 \\ 3 & 2.09579 \mathrm{E}+16 & 0.5 & 2 & 2 \\ 4 & 750135 \mathrm{~F}+14 & 05 & 2 & 2 \end{array}    \text {Classification Matrix}    \begin{array}{lcccr} \text { Actual/}\\ \text { Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 2 & 0 & 2 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 0 & 2 & 2 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Total} & 2 & 2 & 4 & 100.00 \% \end{array}     \text {Test Sample Classification}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {Mahalanobis Distances}   \begin{array}{crrcc} &&&\text { Predicted }&\\ \text { Observation } & \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Group } \\ \hline 1 & 0.5 & 1.64085 \mathrm{E}+18 & 1  \\ 2 & 0.5 & 1.6759 \mathrm{E}+17 & 1  \\ 3 & 2.09579 \mathrm{E}+16 & 0.5 & 2  \\ 4 & 750135 \mathrm{~F}+14 & 05 & 2  \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.4. Compute the discriminant score and predicted group for someone with Score 1 of 242 and Score 2 of 142. Discriminant Analysis Report\text {Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad October 3,2010\text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \quad 5:50:10 PM\text {5:50:10 PM} Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group 1 2 1 241.85 144.2 2 236.8 1422  Group Frequencies \text { Group Frequencies } Relative Group Frequency 1 50.00\% 2 50.00\% Training Sample Classification\text {Training Sample Classification} \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Mahalanobis Distances\text {Mahalanobis Distances} Predicted Actual Observation Group 1 Group2 Group Group 1 0.5 1.64085+18 1 1 2 0.5 1.6759+17 1 1 3 2.09579+16 0.5 2 2 4 750135+14 05 2 2 Classification Matrix\text {Classification Matrix} Actual/ Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 2 0 2 100.00\% Group2 0 2 2 100.00\% Total 2 2 4 100.00\% Test Sample Classification\text {Test Sample Classification} \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Mahalanobis Distances\text {Mahalanobis Distances} Predicted Observation Group 1 Group2 Group 1 0.5 1.64085+18 1 2 0.5 1.6759+17 1 3 2.09579+16 0.5 2 4 750135+14 05 2 -Refer to Exhibit 10.4. Compute the discriminant score and predicted group for someone with Score 1 of 242 and Score 2 of 142.

(Essay)
4.7/5
(77)

Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. The university has received applications from several new students and would like to predict which group they would fall into. What is the discriminant score for a student with a Quantitative score of 686 and a Verbal score of 601. Use five (5) significant figures in your coefficients.  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. The university has received applications from several new students and would like to predict which group they would fall into. What is the discriminant score for a student with a Quantitative score of 686 and a Verbal score of 601. Use five (5) significant figures in your coefficients.  Discriminant Analysis Report\text { Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad  October 1,2010 \text { October 1,2010 }\quad  3:05:44 PM\text { 3:05:44 PM}  Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 6107 6057  Classification Matrix \text { Classification Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 10 90.00\% Group2 2 8 10 80.00\% Tnta1 11 0 20 850\%\%  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. The university has received applications from several new students and would like to predict which group they would fall into. What is the discriminant score for a student with a Quantitative score of 686 and a Verbal score of 601. Use five (5) significant figures in your coefficients. -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. The university has received applications from several new students and would like to predict which group they would fall into. What is the discriminant score for a student with a Quantitative score of 686 and a Verbal score of 601. Use five (5) significant figures in your coefficients.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(85)

Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What is the cut-off value (cell E26) for this data using the mid-point cut-off method?  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What is the cut-off value (cell E26) for this data using the mid-point cut-off method?  Discriminant Analysis Report\text { Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad  October 1,2010 \text { October 1,2010 }\quad  3:05:44 PM\text { 3:05:44 PM}  Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 6107 6057  Classification Matrix \text { Classification Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 10 90.00\% Group2 2 8 10 80.00\% Tnta1 11 0 20 850\%\%  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description, regression results, and the RiskSolver Platform (RSP) Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores, verbal and quantitative. Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies. The officer has data on 20 current students, ten of whom are doing very well (Group 1) and ten who are not (Group 2).       \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 1,2010 }\quad \text { 3:05:44 PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 683.8 & 654.2 \\ 2 & 6107 & 6057 \end{array}    \text { Classification Matrix }   \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 2 & 8 & 10 & 80.00 \% \\ \text { Tnta1 } & 11 & 0 & 20 & 850 \% \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What is the cut-off value (cell E26) for this data using the mid-point cut-off method? -Refer to Exhibit 10.1. What is the cut-off value (cell E26) for this data using the mid-point cut-off method?

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(65)

Refer to Exhibit 10.3. What is the percentage of observations: a. Correctly classified to a Group? b. Incorrectly classified to a Group? c. Correctly classified to Group 1? d. Correctly classified to Group 2? ANS: a. 94.44% b. 5.56% c. 90% d. 100% PTS: 1 Exhibit 10.4 The information below is used for the following questions. A manager wants to classify people as belonging to one of two groups based on two scores. The manager has collected data on four current employees and has performed a regression analysis on the data. The data for the problem and the relevant output are shown below.  Regression Statistics \text { Regression Statistics } Coefficients Intercept 31.8158 Score 1 -0.14956 Score 2 0.03825  Refer to Exhibit 10.3. What is the percentage of observations: a. Correctly classified to a Group? b. Incorrectly classified to a Group? c. Correctly classified to Group 1? d. Correctly classified to Group 2? ANS: a. 94.44% b. 5.56% c. 90% d. 100% PTS: 1 Exhibit 10.4 The information below is used for the following questions. A manager wants to classify people as belonging to one of two groups based on two scores. The manager has collected data on four current employees and has performed a regression analysis on the data. The data for the problem and the relevant output are shown below.   \text { Regression Statistics }   \begin{array}{|l|r|} \hline & \text { Coefficients } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 31.8158 \\ \hline \text { Score 1 } & -0.14956 \\ \hline \text { Score 2 } & 0.03825 \\ \hline \end{array}      \text {Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \quad    \text {5:50:10 PM}   \text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different }    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 241.85 & 144.2 \\ 2 & 236.8 & 1422 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }    \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative } \\ \text { Group } &\text { Frequency }\\ \hline 1 & 50.00 \%\\ 2&50.00\% \end{array}    \text {Training Sample Classification}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {Mahalanobis Distances}   \begin{array}{crrcc} &&&\text { Predicted }&\text { Actual }\\ \text { Observation } & \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Group } & \text { Group } \\ \hline 1 & 0.5 & 1.64085 \mathrm{E}+18 & 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 0.5 & 1.6759 \mathrm{E}+17 & 1 & 1 \\ 3 & 2.09579 \mathrm{E}+16 & 0.5 & 2 & 2 \\ 4 & 750135 \mathrm{~F}+14 & 05 & 2 & 2 \end{array}    \text {Classification Matrix}    \begin{array}{lcccr} \text { Actual/}\\ \text { Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 2 & 0 & 2 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 0 & 2 & 2 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Total} & 2 & 2 & 4 & 100.00 \% \end{array}     \text {Test Sample Classification}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {Mahalanobis Distances}   \begin{array}{crrcc} &&&\text { Predicted }&\\ \text { Observation } & \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Group } \\ \hline 1 & 0.5 & 1.64085 \mathrm{E}+18 & 1  \\ 2 & 0.5 & 1.6759 \mathrm{E}+17 & 1  \\ 3 & 2.09579 \mathrm{E}+16 & 0.5 & 2  \\ 4 & 750135 \mathrm{~F}+14 & 05 & 2  \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.4. What formulas should go in cells C8:D9 and E4:G10 of the spreadsheet? Discriminant Analysis Report\text {Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad October 3,2010\text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \quad 5:50:10 PM\text {5:50:10 PM} Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group 1 2 1 241.85 144.2 2 236.8 1422  Group Frequencies \text { Group Frequencies } Relative Group Frequency 1 50.00\% 2 50.00\% Training Sample Classification\text {Training Sample Classification} \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Mahalanobis Distances\text {Mahalanobis Distances} Predicted Actual Observation Group 1 Group2 Group Group 1 0.5 1.64085+18 1 1 2 0.5 1.6759+17 1 1 3 2.09579+16 0.5 2 2 4 750135+14 05 2 2 Classification Matrix\text {Classification Matrix} Actual/ Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 2 0 2 100.00\% Group2 0 2 2 100.00\% Total 2 2 4 100.00\% Test Sample Classification\text {Test Sample Classification} \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Mahalanobis Distances\text {Mahalanobis Distances} Predicted Observation Group 1 Group2 Group 1 0.5 1.64085+18 1 2 0.5 1.6759+17 1 3 2.09579+16 0.5 2 4 750135+14 05 2 -Refer to Exhibit 10.4. What formulas should go in cells C8:D9 and E4:G10 of the spreadsheet?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(80)

Exhibit 10.5 The information below is used for the following questions. A counselor wants to classify people as belonging to one of three groups based on two scores. The counselor has collected data on twenty people who are known to be in one of the three groups. The data for the problem are in the following spreadsheet. Output generated using Risk Solver Platform (RSP) is also included.  Exhibit 10.5 The information below is used for the following questions. A counselor wants to classify people as belonging to one of three groups based on two scores. The counselor has collected data on twenty people who are known to be in one of the three groups. The data for the problem are in the following spreadsheet. Output generated using Risk Solver Platform (RSP) is also included.     \text {Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \text { 5:56:34 PM}   \text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are differen}    \text { Group Centroids }    \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 242 & 148.8333333 \\ 2 & 237.8571429 & 149.1428571 \\ 3 & 2328571420 & 1411428571 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }   \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative }\\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & 30.00 \% \\ 2 & 35.00 \% \\ 3 & 3500 \% \end{array}       -Refer to Exhibit 10.5. What formulas should go in cells C24:D26 of the spreadsheet? Discriminant Analysis Report\text {Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad \quad October 3,2010\text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad  5:56:34 PM\text { 5:56:34 PM} Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are differen\text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are differen}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group 1 2 1 242 148.8333333 2 237.8571429 149.1428571 3 2328571420 1411428571  Group Frequencies \text { Group Frequencies } Relative Group Frequency 1 30.00\% 2 35.00\% 3 3500\%  Exhibit 10.5 The information below is used for the following questions. A counselor wants to classify people as belonging to one of three groups based on two scores. The counselor has collected data on twenty people who are known to be in one of the three groups. The data for the problem are in the following spreadsheet. Output generated using Risk Solver Platform (RSP) is also included.     \text {Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \text { 5:56:34 PM}   \text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are differen}    \text { Group Centroids }    \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 242 & 148.8333333 \\ 2 & 237.8571429 & 149.1428571 \\ 3 & 2328571420 & 1411428571 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }   \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative }\\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & 30.00 \% \\ 2 & 35.00 \% \\ 3 & 3500 \% \end{array}       -Refer to Exhibit 10.5. What formulas should go in cells C24:D26 of the spreadsheet?  Exhibit 10.5 The information below is used for the following questions. A counselor wants to classify people as belonging to one of three groups based on two scores. The counselor has collected data on twenty people who are known to be in one of the three groups. The data for the problem are in the following spreadsheet. Output generated using Risk Solver Platform (RSP) is also included.     \text {Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \quad \text {October 3,2010}\quad \quad \text { 5:56:34 PM}   \text {Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are differen}    \text { Group Centroids }    \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 242 & 148.8333333 \\ 2 & 237.8571429 & 149.1428571 \\ 3 & 2328571420 & 1411428571 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }   \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative }\\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & 30.00 \% \\ 2 & 35.00 \% \\ 3 & 3500 \% \end{array}       -Refer to Exhibit 10.5. What formulas should go in cells C24:D26 of the spreadsheet? -Refer to Exhibit 10.5. What formulas should go in cells C24:D26 of the spreadsheet?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(71)

Exhibit 10.3 The information below is used for the following questions. A loan officer wants to determine if people will be late in making loan payments. She has information of 18 current loans including the applicants income, level of assets and whether or not the person has been late on payments. She has performed an analysis on the data using Regression tool in Excel and the Risk Solver Platform (RSP). The data for the problem and the relevant output are shown below. Regression Slatisties Coefficients Intercept 3.109577 Income -0.02112 Assets -0.0212  Exhibit 10.3 The information below is used for the following questions. A loan officer wants to determine if people will be late in making loan payments. She has information of 18 current loans including the applicants income, level of assets and whether or not the person has been late on payments. She has performed an analysis on the data using Regression tool in Excel and the Risk Solver Platform (RSP). The data for the problem and the relevant output are shown below.   \begin{array}{l} \text { Regression Slatisties }\\ \begin{array} { | l | r | }  \hline & \text { Coefficients } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3.109577 \\ \hline \text { Income } & -0.02112 \\ \hline \text { Assets } & -0.0212 \\ \hline  \end{array} \end{array}     \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 2,2010 }\quad \text { 5:37:28PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 82.86 & 12.6 \\ 2 & 483875 & 05625 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }    \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative } \\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency }\\ \hline 1 & 55.56 \% \\ 2 & 44.44 \% \end{array}      \text {Classification Matrix}    \begin{array}{lcccr} \text { Actual/}\\ \text { Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 0 & 8 & 8 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Total} & 0 & 0 & 18 & 04.44 \% \end{array}     -Refer to Exhibit 10.3. Compute the discriminant score and predicted group for someone with an income of 65 and assets of 11.  Discriminant Analysis Report\text { Discriminant Analysis Report} \quad \quad \quad  October 2,2010 \text { October 2,2010 }\quad  5:37:28PM\text { 5:37:28PM}  Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different\text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}  Group Centroids \text { Group Centroids } Group 1 2 1 82.86 12.6 2 483875 05625  Group Frequencies \text { Group Frequencies } Relative Group Frequency 1 55.56\% 2 44.44\%  Exhibit 10.3 The information below is used for the following questions. A loan officer wants to determine if people will be late in making loan payments. She has information of 18 current loans including the applicants income, level of assets and whether or not the person has been late on payments. She has performed an analysis on the data using Regression tool in Excel and the Risk Solver Platform (RSP). The data for the problem and the relevant output are shown below.   \begin{array}{l} \text { Regression Slatisties }\\ \begin{array} { | l | r | }  \hline & \text { Coefficients } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3.109577 \\ \hline \text { Income } & -0.02112 \\ \hline \text { Assets } & -0.0212 \\ \hline  \end{array} \end{array}     \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 2,2010 }\quad \text { 5:37:28PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 82.86 & 12.6 \\ 2 & 483875 & 05625 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }    \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative } \\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency }\\ \hline 1 & 55.56 \% \\ 2 & 44.44 \% \end{array}      \text {Classification Matrix}    \begin{array}{lcccr} \text { Actual/}\\ \text { Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 0 & 8 & 8 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Total} & 0 & 0 & 18 & 04.44 \% \end{array}     -Refer to Exhibit 10.3. Compute the discriminant score and predicted group for someone with an income of 65 and assets of 11. Classification Matrix\text {Classification Matrix} Actual/ Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 10 90.00\% Group2 0 8 8 100.00\% Total 0 0 18 04.44\%  Exhibit 10.3 The information below is used for the following questions. A loan officer wants to determine if people will be late in making loan payments. She has information of 18 current loans including the applicants income, level of assets and whether or not the person has been late on payments. She has performed an analysis on the data using Regression tool in Excel and the Risk Solver Platform (RSP). The data for the problem and the relevant output are shown below.   \begin{array}{l} \text { Regression Slatisties }\\ \begin{array} { | l | r | }  \hline & \text { Coefficients } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3.109577 \\ \hline \text { Income } & -0.02112 \\ \hline \text { Assets } & -0.0212 \\ \hline  \end{array} \end{array}     \text { Discriminant Analysis Report}   \quad \quad \quad \text { October 2,2010 }\quad \text { 5:37:28PM}   \text { Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used, assuming they are different}    \text { Group Centroids }   \begin{array}{crr} \text { Group } & \mathrm{X} 1 & \mathrm{X} 2 \\ \hline 1 & 82.86 & 12.6 \\ 2 & 483875 & 05625 \end{array}    \text { Group Frequencies }    \begin{array}{cr} &\text { Relative } \\ \text { Group } & \text { Frequency }\\ \hline 1 & 55.56 \% \\ 2 & 44.44 \% \end{array}      \text {Classification Matrix}    \begin{array}{lcccr} \text { Actual/}\\ \text { Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \text { \% correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 10 & 90.00 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 0 & 8 & 8 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Total} & 0 & 0 & 18 & 04.44 \% \end{array}     -Refer to Exhibit 10.3. Compute the discriminant score and predicted group for someone with an income of 65 and assets of 11. -Refer to Exhibit 10.3. Compute the discriminant score and predicted group for someone with an income of 65 and assets of 11.

(Essay)
4.7/5
(87)

Which of the following is not true regarding discriminant analysis?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(86)
Showing 21 - 40 of 57
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)