Question 1

The 2002 Supreme Court case Penry v.Lynaugh resulted in the mentally retarded being exempt from the death penalty.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False  False

Question 2

Expert testimony does not influence the jury's verdict.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False  False

Question 3

Do you believe that psychologists should be allowed to testify regarding the ultimate issue? Why or why not?

Accepted Answer

Pros of ultimate issue testimony: jurors and/or judges do not have to integrate complex and technical findings without the benefit of an expert's opinion regarding the issue at hand; there is some empirical evidence that jurors and judges prefer experts to state opinions regarding the ultimate issue.Cons of ultimate issue testimony: jurors or judges may go along with the ultimate issue testimony without critically thinking about the flaws of the expert's opinion due to reliance on the opinion of the expert; causes the expert who is supposed to be objective and impartial to take on some aspects of the role of the trier of fact.

Question 4

A psychologist is automatically qualified as an expert witness on the basis of his/her training and education.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 5

Pretrial publicity has been found to have no effect on jurors.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 6

Discuss the use of strict cutoff scores in the evaluation of mental retardation for capital cases.Are you in favor of them or not? Debate your position.

Accepted Answer

Pros of strict cutoff scores: creates a

Question 7

Discuss your views about the CSI effect hypothesis presented in this chapter.Do you believe that jurors expect too much from forensic science?

Accepted Answer

Pros of CSI effect: protects defendants

Question 8

Discuss the Frye and Daubert standards and how they might affect the admissibility of psychological evidence.

Accepted Answer

According to the ruling from Daubert jud

Question 9

A forensic consultant conducting a mitigation evaluation must include only information supportive of a lesser sentence or reduced culpability in order to fulfill their ethical obli- gation to protect the defendant from potentially harmful effects from the evaluation.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

The 2002 Supreme Court case Penry v.Lynaugh resulted in the mentally retarded being exempt from the death penalty.

Expert testimony does not influence the jury's verdict.

Do you believe that psychologists should be allowed to testify regarding the ultimate issue? Why or why not?

A psychologist is automatically qualified as an expert witness on the basis of his/her training and education.

Pretrial publicity has been found to have no effect on jurors.

Discuss the use of strict cutoff scores in the evaluation of mental retardation for capital cases.Are you in favor of them or not? Debate your position.

Discuss your views about the CSI effect hypothesis presented in this chapter.Do you believe that jurors expect too much from forensic science?

Discuss the Frye and Daubert standards and how they might affect the admissibility of psychological evidence.

A forensic consultant conducting a mitigation evaluation must include only information supportive of a lesser sentence or reduced culpability in order to fulfill their ethical obli- gation to protect the defendant from potentially harmful effects from the evaluation.

Adult Forensic Evaluation

Civil Forensics

Adult Issues in Policing

Adult Issues in Corrections Psychology

Juvenilefamily Forensics

Juvenilefamily Forensics

Juvenile Issues in Policing and Correctional Psychology

Violence in the Family

Family Forensics

Familycommunity Issues in Policing

Familycommunity Issues in Correctionscorrectional Psychology

Filters

Exam 2: Adult Forensic Consultation

The 2002 Supreme Court case Penry v.Lynaugh resulted in the mentally retarded being exempt from the death penalty.

Expert testimony does not influence the jury's verdict.

Do you believe that psychologists should be allowed to testify regarding the ultimate issue? Why or why not?

A psychologist is automatically qualified as an expert witness on the basis of his/her training and education.

Pretrial publicity has been found to have no effect on jurors.

Discuss the use of strict cutoff scores in the evaluation of mental retardation for capital cases.Are you in favor of them or not? Debate your position.

Discuss your views about the CSI effect hypothesis presented in this chapter.Do you believe that jurors expect too much from forensic science?

Discuss the Frye and Daubert standards and how they might affect the admissibility of psychological evidence.

A forensic consultant conducting a mitigation evaluation must include only information supportive of a lesser sentence or reduced culpability in order to fulfill their ethical obli- gation to protect the defendant from potentially harmful effects from the evaluation.

Adult Forensic Evaluation

Civil Forensics

Adult Issues in Policing

Adult Issues in Corrections Psychology

Juvenilefamily Forensics

Juvenilefamily Forensics

Juvenile Issues in Policing and Correctional Psychology

Violence in the Family

Family Forensics

Familycommunity Issues in Policing

Familycommunity Issues in Correctionscorrectional Psychology

Filters